Game Recap
It was all Edmonton Oilers in a 8-1 rout of the Los Angeles Kings on Thursday. EDM generated 11 high-danger looks compared to just 4 from LAK. The numbers backed up the result — EDM generated 9.10 expected goals to LAK's 4.89 at 5-on-5 (55.6% Corsi). Jake Walman had a 2-goal game. EDM peppered the net with 37 shots to LAK's 22.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs Los Angeles Kings progressed on Feb 26, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
EDM8 - 1LAK
Feb 26, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| LAK | P1 | 20 | 13 | 60.6 | 12 | 11 | 52.2 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 13 | 11 | 54.2 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 1.83 | 2.08 | 46.8 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 |
| P2 | 20 | 26 | 43.5 | 16 | 20 | 44.4 | 10 | 16 | 38.5 | 17 | 16 | 51.5 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 3.35 | 4.58 | 42.2 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 12 | 24 | 33.3 | 7 | 18 | 28.0 | 3 | 14 | 17.6 | 9 | 15 | 37.5 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 1.92 | 3.96 | 32.6 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 52 | 63 | 45.2 | 35 | 49 | 41.7 | 22 | 37 | 37.3 | 39 | 42 | 48.1 | 8 | 14 | 36.4 | 7.09 | 10.62 | 40.0 | 1 | 8 | 11.1 | |
| EDM | P1 | 13 | 20 | 39.4 | 11 | 12 | 47.8 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 11 | 13 | 45.8 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 2.08 | 1.83 | 53.2 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 |
| P2 | 26 | 20 | 56.5 | 20 | 16 | 55.6 | 16 | 10 | 61.5 | 16 | 17 | 48.5 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | 4.58 | 3.35 | 57.8 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 24 | 12 | 66.7 | 18 | 7 | 72.0 | 14 | 3 | 82.4 | 15 | 9 | 62.5 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 3.96 | 1.92 | 67.4 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 63 | 52 | 54.8 | 49 | 35 | 58.3 | 37 | 22 | 62.7 | 42 | 39 | 51.9 | 14 | 8 | 63.6 | 10.62 | 7.09 | 60.0 | 8 | 1 | 88.9 | |
Win Probability
LAK Favored
EDM Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
LAK
EDM
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
EDM Attempts
LAK Attempts
Individual Event Map
EDM ShootLAK Shoot
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (LAK) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = LAK players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the LAK player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| LAK ↓ / EDM → | Roslovic | Henrique | Frederic | Savoie | McDavid | Draisaitl | Nugent-Hopkins | Lazar | Hyman | Mangiapane | Podkolzin | Nurse | Walman | Stastney | Emberson | Bouchard | Ekholm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kopitar | 44 | 43 | 30 | 50 | 33 | 29 | 27 | 50 | 11 | 50 | 31 | 36 | 41 | 50 | 33 | 38 | 43 |
| Turcotte | 33 | 20 | 22 | 29 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 36 | 25 | 22 | 35 | 40 | 36 | 23 | 23 | 25 | 40 |
| Panarin | 41 | 50 | 57 | 43 | 42 | 38 | 45 | 43 | 11 | 38 | 40 | 43 | 39 | 83 | 56 | 30 | 45 |
| Moore | 80 | 75 | 0 | 90 | 43 | 57 | 37 | 50 | 38 | 71 | 33 | 71 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 48 | 45 |
| Malott | 43 | 18 | 21 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 43 | 0 | 20 | 30 | 33 | 33 | 21 | 20 | 20 | 50 |
| Foegele | 45 | 43 | 27 | 43 | 23 | 11 | 18 | 100 | 23 | 67 | 27 | 25 | 40 | 44 | 27 | 25 | 50 |
| Byfield | 38 | 14 | 0 | 64 | 39 | 42 | 33 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 27 | 42 | 43 | 17 | 14 | 39 | 43 |
| Laferriere | 50 | 70 | 43 | 63 | 50 | 42 | 57 | 56 | 38 | 62 | 43 | 50 | 56 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 67 |
| Kempe | 44 | 44 | 44 | 43 | 38 | 36 | 38 | 50 | 10 | 50 | 44 | 47 | 39 | 63 | 56 | 30 | 56 |
| Perry | 29 | 44 | 25 | 27 | 71 | 13 | 80 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 38 | 22 | 22 | 50 | 38 | 50 | 60 |
| Ward | 43 | 39 | 21 | 73 | 30 | 43 | 33 | 40 | 30 | 43 | 33 | 54 | 56 | 45 | 33 | 27 | 30 |
| Armia | 100 | — | — | 100 | 50 | 100 | 29 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 50 | — | — | 56 | 50 |
| Clarke | 47 | 57 | 30 | 44 | 50 | 33 | 45 | 43 | 30 | 60 | 33 | 45 | 36 | 50 | 44 | 60 | 62 |
| Ceci | 31 | 15 | 23 | 50 | 29 | 38 | 25 | 56 | 27 | 38 | 44 | 42 | 39 | 33 | 33 | 32 | 44 |
| Dumoulin | 47 | 40 | 18 | 58 | 40 | 33 | 43 | 45 | 36 | 50 | 25 | 53 | 53 | 33 | 20 | 35 | 53 |
| Edmundson | 33 | 25 | 20 | 29 | 31 | 29 | 29 | 50 | 33 | 43 | 29 | 22 | 21 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 58 |
| Anderson | 40 | 23 | 32 | 58 | 33 | 33 | 26 | 40 | 26 | 25 | 37 | 38 | 46 | 31 | 31 | 35 | 35 |
| Doughty | 86 | 50 | 44 | 75 | 39 | 33 | 31 | 67 | 27 | 67 | 30 | 63 | 70 | 45 | 33 | 40 | 40 |
