Game Recap
The Edmonton Oilers defeated the Los Angeles Kings 8-1 on February 26, 2026. The Edmonton Oilers controlled play with 55.6% Corsi and generated 9.10 expected goals compared to 4.89 from the Los Angeles Kings at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Edmonton Oilers created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 4 from the Los Angeles Kings at 5-on-5. Jake Walman scored 2 goals. Vasily Podkolzin was the most dangerous skater with 1.88 individual expected goals on 6 shots at 5-on-5. The Edmonton Oilers outshot the Los Angeles Kings 37-22 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs Los Angeles Kings progressed on Feb 26, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
EDM8 - 1LAK
Feb 26, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| LAK | P1 | 20 | 13 | 60.6 | 12 | 11 | 52.2 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 13 | 11 | 54.2 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 1.83 | 2.08 | 46.8 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 |
| P2 | 20 | 26 | 43.5 | 16 | 20 | 44.4 | 10 | 16 | 38.5 | 17 | 16 | 51.5 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 3.35 | 4.58 | 42.2 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 12 | 24 | 33.3 | 7 | 18 | 28.0 | 3 | 14 | 17.6 | 9 | 15 | 37.5 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 1.92 | 3.96 | 32.6 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 52 | 63 | 45.2 | 35 | 49 | 41.7 | 22 | 37 | 37.3 | 39 | 42 | 48.1 | 8 | 14 | 36.4 | 7.09 | 10.62 | 40.0 | 1 | 8 | 11.1 | |
| EDM | P1 | 13 | 20 | 39.4 | 11 | 12 | 47.8 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 11 | 13 | 45.8 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 2.08 | 1.83 | 53.2 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 |
| P2 | 26 | 20 | 56.5 | 20 | 16 | 55.6 | 16 | 10 | 61.5 | 16 | 17 | 48.5 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | 4.58 | 3.35 | 57.8 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 24 | 12 | 66.7 | 18 | 7 | 72.0 | 14 | 3 | 82.4 | 15 | 9 | 62.5 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 3.96 | 1.92 | 67.4 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 63 | 52 | 54.8 | 49 | 35 | 58.3 | 37 | 22 | 62.7 | 42 | 39 | 51.9 | 14 | 8 | 63.6 | 10.62 | 7.09 | 60.0 | 8 | 1 | 88.9 | |
Win Probability
LAK Favored
EDM Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
LAK
EDM
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
EDM Attempts
LAK Attempts
Individual Event Map
EDM ShootLAK Shoot
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (LAK) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = LAK players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the LAK player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| LAK ↓ / EDM → | Roslovic | Henrique | Frederic | Savoie | McDavid | Draisaitl | Nugent-Hopkins | Lazar | Hyman | Mangiapane | Podkolzin | Nurse | Walman | Stastney | Emberson | Bouchard | Ekholm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kopitar | 44 | 43 | 30 | 50 | 33 | 29 | 27 | 50 | 11 | 50 | 31 | 36 | 41 | 50 | 33 | 38 | 43 |
| Turcotte | 33 | 20 | 22 | 29 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 36 | 25 | 22 | 35 | 40 | 36 | 23 | 23 | 25 | 40 |
| Panarin | 41 | 50 | 57 | 43 | 42 | 38 | 45 | 43 | 11 | 38 | 40 | 43 | 39 | 83 | 56 | 30 | 45 |
| Moore | 80 | 75 | 0 | 90 | 43 | 57 | 37 | 50 | 38 | 71 | 33 | 71 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 48 | 45 |
| Malott | 43 | 18 | 21 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 43 | 0 | 20 | 30 | 33 | 33 | 21 | 20 | 20 | 50 |
| Foegele | 45 | 43 | 27 | 43 | 23 | 11 | 18 | 100 | 23 | 67 | 27 | 25 | 40 | 44 | 27 | 25 | 50 |
| Byfield | 38 | 14 | 0 | 64 | 39 | 42 | 33 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 27 | 42 | 43 | 17 | 14 | 39 | 43 |
| Laferriere | 50 | 70 | 43 | 63 | 50 | 42 | 57 | 56 | 38 | 62 | 43 | 50 | 56 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 67 |
| Kempe | 44 | 44 | 44 | 43 | 38 | 36 | 38 | 50 | 10 | 50 | 44 | 47 | 39 | 63 | 56 | 30 | 56 |
| Perry | 29 | 44 | 25 | 27 | 71 | 13 | 80 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 38 | 22 | 22 | 50 | 38 | 50 | 60 |
| Ward | 43 | 39 | 21 | 73 | 30 | 43 | 33 | 40 | 30 | 43 | 33 | 54 | 56 | 45 | 33 | 27 | 30 |
| Armia | 100 | — | — | 100 | 50 | 100 | 29 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 50 | — | — | 56 | 50 |
| Clarke | 47 | 57 | 30 | 44 | 50 | 33 | 45 | 43 | 30 | 60 | 33 | 45 | 36 | 50 | 44 | 60 | 62 |
| Ceci | 31 | 15 | 23 | 50 | 29 | 38 | 25 | 56 | 27 | 38 | 44 | 42 | 39 | 33 | 33 | 32 | 44 |
| Dumoulin | 47 | 40 | 18 | 58 | 40 | 33 | 43 | 45 | 36 | 50 | 25 | 53 | 53 | 33 | 20 | 35 | 53 |
| Edmundson | 33 | 25 | 20 | 29 | 31 | 29 | 29 | 50 | 33 | 43 | 29 | 22 | 21 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 58 |
| Anderson | 40 | 23 | 32 | 58 | 33 | 33 | 26 | 40 | 26 | 25 | 37 | 38 | 46 | 31 | 31 | 35 | 35 |
| Doughty | 86 | 50 | 44 | 75 | 39 | 33 | 31 | 67 | 27 | 67 | 30 | 63 | 70 | 45 | 33 | 40 | 40 |
