Game Recap
The Calgary Flames came away with a 4-1 victory over the San Jose Sharks on February 26, 2026. Backlund was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 2.04 individual expected goals on 4 shots. SJS generated 13 high-danger looks compared to just 9 from CGY. A close game in the analytics too — SJS and CGY were nearly dead even in expected goals at 5-on-5 (6.82 vs 7.30). Kadri put up 2 goals. SJS outshot CGY 35-29.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Calgary Flames vs San Jose Sharks progressed on Feb 26, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CGY4 - 1SJS
Feb 26, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| SJS | P1 | 26 | 12 | 68.4 | 19 | 10 | 65.5 | 16 | 6 | 72.7 | 19 | 8 | 70.4 | 7 | 1 | 87.5 | 3.68 | 1.39 | 72.6 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 24 | 15 | 61.5 | 14 | 13 | 51.9 | 12 | 10 | 54.5 | 23 | 12 | 65.7 | 8 | 3 | 72.7 | 3.81 | 3.16 | 54.7 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 20 | 20 | 50.0 | 12 | 16 | 42.9 | 7 | 13 | 35.0 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 2.29 | 4.22 | 35.2 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 70 | 47 | 59.8 | 45 | 39 | 53.6 | 35 | 29 | 54.7 | 56 | 32 | 63.6 | 20 | 10 | 66.7 | 9.78 | 8.77 | 52.7 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | |
| CGY | P1 | 12 | 26 | 31.6 | 10 | 19 | 34.5 | 6 | 16 | 27.3 | 8 | 19 | 29.6 | 1 | 7 | 12.5 | 1.39 | 3.68 | 27.4 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 15 | 24 | 38.5 | 13 | 14 | 48.1 | 10 | 12 | 45.5 | 12 | 23 | 34.3 | 3 | 8 | 27.3 | 3.16 | 3.81 | 45.3 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 20 | 20 | 50.0 | 16 | 12 | 57.1 | 13 | 7 | 65.0 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 4.22 | 2.29 | 64.8 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 47 | 70 | 40.2 | 39 | 45 | 46.4 | 29 | 35 | 45.3 | 32 | 56 | 36.4 | 10 | 20 | 33.3 | 8.77 | 9.78 | 47.3 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | |
Win Probability
SJS Favored
CGY Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
SJS
CGY
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CGY Attempts
SJS Attempts
Individual Event Map
CGY ShootSJS Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (SJS) performed against every skater on the away team (CGY) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = SJS players, Columns = CGY players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the SJS player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| SJS ↓ / CGY → | Kadri | Zary | Backlund | Sharangovich | Frost | Beecher | Pospisil | Farabee | Coleman | Coronato | Gridin | Klapka | Bahl | Weegar | Whitecloud | Kuznetsov | Parekh | Hanley |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celebrini | 70 | 67 | 64 | 60 | 83 | 44 | 17 | 74 | 69 | 57 | 80 | 14 | 61 | 82 | 48 | 71 | 60 | 0 |
| Wennberg | 54 | 69 | 75 | 77 | 75 | 71 | 50 | 67 | 65 | 67 | 65 | 33 | 63 | 81 | 67 | 90 | 58 | 33 |
| Toffoli | 71 | 80 | 45 | 57 | 58 | 60 | 33 | 78 | 57 | 45 | 55 | 33 | 57 | 55 | 70 | 75 | 36 | 33 |
| Misa | 44 | 64 | 29 | 29 | 50 | 56 | 33 | 56 | 53 | 29 | 44 | 33 | 50 | 36 | 63 | 50 | 33 | 25 |
| Smith | 33 | 33 | 100 | 83 | 50 | 44 | 29 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 50 | 20 | 50 | 69 | 50 | 63 | 33 | 33 |
| Kurashev | 78 | 77 | 89 | 88 | 60 | 83 | 100 | 78 | 67 | 100 | 67 | 50 | 72 | 85 | 79 | 90 | 50 | 50 |
| Goodrow | 29 | 40 | 25 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 50 | — | 40 | 40 |
| Ostapchuk | 33 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 40 | 50 |
| Sherwood | 56 | 58 | 61 | 50 | 67 | 40 | 25 | 63 | 50 | 46 | 67 | 17 | 55 | 75 | 48 | 61 | 20 | 20 |
| Eklund | 63 | 82 | 55 | 67 | 55 | 60 | 33 | 78 | 52 | 44 | 50 | 33 | 57 | 55 | 67 | 67 | 45 | 25 |
| Graf | 64 | 64 | 80 | 82 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 64 | 73 | 90 | 67 | 33 | 65 | 76 | 73 | 92 | 67 | 50 |
| Reaves | 40 | 50 | 33 | 50 | — | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 50 | — | 50 | 40 |
| Orlov | 56 | 64 | 67 | 80 | 29 | 40 | 13 | 59 | 47 | 69 | 14 | 14 | 65 | 50 | 60 | 33 | 33 | 25 |
| Klingberg | 43 | 47 | 69 | 60 | 56 | 43 | 0 | 58 | 50 | 64 | 38 | 0 | 60 | 61 | 53 | 42 | 25 | 40 |
| Dickinson | 50 | 55 | 55 | 64 | 70 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 60 | 63 | 38 | 42 | 64 | 50 | 65 | 55 | 45 |
| Ferraro | 42 | 50 | 44 | 44 | 70 | 75 | 67 | 46 | 70 | 40 | 62 | 50 | 30 | 60 | 56 | 93 | 45 | 25 |
| Desharnais | 44 | 56 | 75 | 86 | 71 | 40 | 50 | 55 | 50 | 63 | 50 | 33 | 29 | 63 | 50 | 85 | 56 | 50 |
| Liljegren | 50 | 57 | 50 | 44 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 57 | 67 | 43 | 70 | 50 | 30 | 62 | 63 | 93 | 55 | 17 |
