Game Recap
The Carolina Hurricanes defeated the Tampa Bay Lightning 5-4 on February 26, 2026. Despite the result, the Tampa Bay Lightning held the edge in expected goals (7.27 to 6.38) at 5-on-5, indicating the Carolina Hurricanes received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Tampa Bay Lightning created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 8 from the Carolina Hurricanes at 5-on-5. Dominic James was the most dangerous skater with 1.52 individual expected goals on 3 shots at 5-on-5. The Carolina Hurricanes outshot the Tampa Bay Lightning 33-28 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Tampa Bay Lightning vs Carolina Hurricanes progressed on Feb 26, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
TBL4 - 5CAR
Feb 26, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| CAR | P1 | 21 | 18 | 53.8 | 18 | 15 | 54.5 | 13 | 11 | 54.2 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 7 | 4 | 63.6 | 4.46 | 3.21 | 58.1 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 20 | 45.9 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 9 | 17 | 34.6 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 1.46 | 3.34 | 30.3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| P3 | 24 | 19 | 55.8 | 11 | 11 | 50.0 | 10 | 6 | 62.5 | 14 | 14 | 50.0 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 1.29 | 3.73 | 25.7 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 62 | 57 | 52.1 | 41 | 40 | 50.6 | 33 | 28 | 54.1 | 36 | 44 | 45.0 | 11 | 17 | 39.3 | 7.20 | 10.28 | 41.2 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | |
| TBL | P1 | 18 | 21 | 46.2 | 15 | 18 | 45.5 | 11 | 13 | 45.8 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 4 | 7 | 36.4 | 3.21 | 4.46 | 41.9 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 17 | 54.1 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 17 | 9 | 65.4 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 3.34 | 1.46 | 69.7 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| P3 | 19 | 24 | 44.2 | 11 | 11 | 50.0 | 6 | 10 | 37.5 | 14 | 14 | 50.0 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 3.73 | 1.29 | 74.3 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 57 | 62 | 47.9 | 40 | 41 | 49.4 | 28 | 33 | 45.9 | 44 | 36 | 55.0 | 17 | 11 | 60.7 | 10.28 | 7.20 | 58.8 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | |
Win Probability
CAR Favored
TBL Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
CAR
TBL
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
TBL Attempts
CAR Attempts
Individual Event Map
TBL ShootCAR Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CAR) performed against every skater on the away team (TBL) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = CAR players, Columns = TBL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the CAR player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| CAR ↓ / TBL → | Point | Guentzel | Girgensons | Gourde | James | Goncalves | Hagel | Kucherov | Holmberg | Bjorkstrand | Sabourin | Raddysh | Moser | Cernak | D'Astous | McDonagh | Hedman | Carlile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aho | 52 | 55 | 60 | 60 | 50 | 53 | 75 | 50 | 33 | 25 | 100 | 48 | 53 | 78 | 60 | 75 | 50 | 50 |
| Jarvis | 50 | 55 | 67 | 67 | 0 | 54 | 86 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 100 | 53 | 50 | 78 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 33 |
| Staal | 0 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 45 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 100 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 56 | 100 | 56 | 60 | 25 |
| Stankoven | 67 | 60 | 56 | 64 | 44 | 50 | 56 | 50 | 62 | 50 | — | 57 | 83 | 50 | 78 | 45 | 75 | 33 |
| Hall | 67 | 60 | 56 | 60 | 33 | 33 | 56 | 40 | 47 | 29 | 100 | 44 | 71 | 38 | 80 | 36 | 67 | 50 |
| Martinook | 20 | 43 | — | — | 50 | 33 | 46 | 25 | — | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 75 | 43 | 57 | 33 |
| Ehlers | 0 | 47 | 67 | 67 | 45 | 0 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 56 | 67 | 56 | 56 | 25 |
| Jankowski | 67 | 50 | 58 | 61 | 25 | 75 | 33 | 67 | 41 | 45 | 67 | 86 | 40 | 18 | 75 | 0 | 60 | 75 |
| Carrier | 50 | 33 | 55 | 59 | 50 | 75 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 33 | 25 | 69 | 0 | 60 | 63 |
| Robinson | 67 | 50 | 54 | 56 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 47 | 50 | 60 | 75 | 25 | 29 | 80 | 0 | 50 | 67 |
| Blake | 75 | 63 | 59 | 65 | 42 | 33 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 38 | 100 | 58 | 70 | 38 | 78 | 36 | 73 | 50 |
| Svechnikov | 58 | 71 | 75 | 75 | 100 | 57 | 75 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 60 | 57 | 78 | 75 | 75 | 60 | 100 |
| Gostisbehere | 67 | 73 | 58 | 67 | 40 | 100 | 64 | 75 | 56 | 63 | 100 | 86 | 75 | 50 | 72 | 42 | 60 | 56 |
| Miller | 38 | 45 | 43 | 50 | 54 | 20 | 56 | 46 | 20 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 38 | 71 | 50 | 50 | 60 |
| Walker | 38 | 50 | 43 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 56 | 38 | 20 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 40 | 42 | 80 | 47 | 50 | 60 |
| Slavin | 48 | 11 | 67 | 57 | 13 | 61 | 20 | 44 | 33 | 13 | 33 | 40 | 47 | 23 | 86 | 25 | 80 | 50 |
| Nikishin | 100 | 80 | 58 | 64 | 50 | — | 67 | 67 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 83 | 100 | 57 | 73 | 33 | 64 | 56 |
| Chatfield | 53 | 0 | 67 | 40 | 20 | 53 | 25 | 48 | 25 | 11 | 33 | 47 | 47 | 30 | 75 | 38 | 50 | 50 |
