Game Recap
After a back-and-forth affair, the Detroit Red Wings pulled out a 2-1 win in overtime on Thursday. Dig into the 5-on-5 data, and OTT had the better of it (6.58 xG to 5.25). Sometimes the bounces just don't go your way. Dylan Larkin had a 2-goal game.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Detroit Red Wings vs Ottawa Senators progressed on Feb 26, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
DET2 - 1OTT (OT)
Feb 26, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| OTT | P1 | 28 | 12 | 70.0 | 22 | 6 | 78.6 | 13 | 4 | 76.5 | 22 | 6 | 78.6 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 86.5 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 18 | 23 | 43.9 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 3.13 | 3.20 | 49.4 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 18 | 23 | 43.9 | 9 | 13 | 40.9 | 5 | 8 | 38.5 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 1.46 | 2.52 | 36.6 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| OT | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 66 | 59 | 52.8 | 44 | 33 | 57.1 | 27 | 20 | 57.4 | 50 | 38 | 56.8 | 9 | 6 | 60.0 | 8.16 | 6.78 | 54.6 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| DET | P1 | 12 | 28 | 30.0 | 6 | 22 | 21.4 | 4 | 13 | 23.5 | 6 | 22 | 21.4 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.56 | 3.58 | 13.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 23 | 18 | 56.1 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 3.20 | 3.13 | 50.6 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 23 | 18 | 56.1 | 13 | 9 | 59.1 | 8 | 5 | 61.5 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 2.52 | 1.46 | 63.4 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| OT | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 59 | 66 | 47.2 | 33 | 44 | 42.9 | 20 | 27 | 42.6 | 38 | 50 | 43.2 | 6 | 9 | 40.0 | 6.78 | 8.16 | 45.4 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
Win Probability
OTT Favored
DET Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
OTT
DET
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
DET Attempts
OTT Attempts
Individual Event Map
DET ShootOTT Shoot
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (OTT) performed against every skater on the away team (DET) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = OTT players, Columns = DET players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the OTT player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| OTT ↓ / DET → | Larkin | Kasper | Copp | Rasmussen | Appleton | Finnie | Raymond | Compher | Soderblom | van Riemsdyk | DeBrincat | Kane | Chiarot | Seider | Edvinsson | Bernard-Docker | Johansson | Sandin-Pellikka |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinto | 54 | 67 | 0 | 100 | 83 | 50 | 53 | 50 | 100 | 20 | 25 | 29 | 62 | 59 | 68 | 60 | 60 | 22 |
| Cousins | 60 | 67 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 59 | 50 | 100 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 67 | 70 | 75 | 57 | 33 |
| Cozens | 100 | — | 75 | 100 | 67 | 67 | — | 83 | — | — | 73 | 73 | 75 | 86 | 88 | 73 | 100 | 100 |
| Greig | 50 | 0 | 54 | 100 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 20 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 60 | 33 | 25 |
| Stützle | 86 | — | 80 | 86 | 45 | 50 | 50 | 38 | 67 | — | 22 | 0 | 43 | 69 | 69 | 67 | 50 | 29 |
| Eller | 50 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 27 | 57 | 0 | 50 | 100 |
| Halliday | — | 100 | — | 40 | 86 | 67 | — | 67 | 40 | 40 | — | 100 | 67 | 40 | 78 | 50 | 80 | — |
| Tkachuk | 63 | 0 | 75 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 80 | — | — | 73 | 65 | 73 | 75 | 78 | 67 | 60 | 33 |
| Zetterlund | 100 | — | 33 | 40 | 75 | 75 | 100 | 75 | 40 | 40 | 43 | 33 | 50 | 22 | 60 | 80 | 50 | 100 |
| Amadio | 58 | 64 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 57 | 50 | 100 | 40 | 33 | 0 | 62 | 57 | 64 | 60 | 70 | 50 |
| Giroux | 33 | 100 | 33 | 0 | 73 | 40 | 33 | 50 | 0 | — | 33 | 31 | 25 | 13 | 71 | 60 | 80 | 60 |
| Batherson | 88 | — | 80 | 86 | 50 | 56 | 67 | 47 | 75 | — | 30 | 0 | 50 | 73 | 73 | 75 | 50 | 29 |
| Sanderson | 69 | 72 | 71 | 91 | 33 | 33 | 63 | 57 | 83 | 60 | 63 | 33 | 93 | 64 | 68 | 90 | 55 | 43 |
| Zub | 53 | 57 | 50 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 17 | 83 | 50 | 40 | 38 | 92 | 29 | 38 | 89 | 50 | 40 |
| Chabot | 17 | 56 | 50 | 50 | 56 | 33 | 17 | 25 | 50 | 25 | 39 | 60 | 37 | 17 | 56 | 47 | 75 | 25 |
| Jensen | 50 | 67 | 55 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 43 | 46 | 29 | 75 | 75 | 38 | 40 | 22 |
| Spence | 67 | 100 | 43 | 50 | 80 | 70 | 50 | 70 | 33 | 0 | 50 | 44 | 50 | 40 | 89 | 83 | 75 | 60 |
| Kleven | 75 | — | 43 | 50 | 70 | 67 | 67 | 63 | 50 | 0 | 44 | 17 | 38 | 45 | 83 | 75 | 63 | 60 |
