Game Recap
The Anaheim Ducks defeated the Edmonton Oilers 6-5 on February 25, 2026. Despite the result, the Edmonton Oilers held the edge in expected goals (10.66 to 4.68) at 5-on-5, indicating the Anaheim Ducks received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Edmonton Oilers created 8 high-danger scoring chances compared to 6 from the Anaheim Ducks at 5-on-5. Zach Hyman was the most dangerous skater with 2.35 individual expected goals on 3 shots at 5-on-5. The Anaheim Ducks outshot the Edmonton Oilers 29-27 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs Anaheim Ducks progressed on Feb 25, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
EDM5 - 6ANA
Feb 25, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| ANA | P1 | 19 | 16 | 54.3 | 15 | 14 | 51.7 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 6 | 4 | 60.0 | 3.99 | 4.30 | 48.1 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 |
| P2 | 17 | 21 | 44.7 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 9 | 8 | 52.9 | 8 | 15 | 34.8 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 2.28 | 4.01 | 36.2 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| P3 | 18 | 25 | 41.9 | 14 | 16 | 46.7 | 10 | 9 | 52.6 | 8 | 18 | 30.8 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 2.44 | 4.62 | 34.6 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | |
| Total | 54 | 62 | 46.6 | 42 | 47 | 47.2 | 29 | 27 | 51.8 | 29 | 48 | 37.7 | 10 | 12 | 45.5 | 8.70 | 12.92 | 40.2 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | |
| EDM | P1 | 16 | 19 | 45.7 | 14 | 15 | 48.3 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 4 | 6 | 40.0 | 4.30 | 3.99 | 51.9 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 |
| P2 | 21 | 17 | 55.3 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 8 | 9 | 47.1 | 15 | 8 | 65.2 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 4.01 | 2.28 | 63.8 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| P3 | 25 | 18 | 58.1 | 16 | 14 | 53.3 | 9 | 10 | 47.4 | 18 | 8 | 69.2 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 4.62 | 2.44 | 65.4 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | |
| Total | 62 | 54 | 53.4 | 47 | 42 | 52.8 | 27 | 29 | 48.2 | 48 | 29 | 62.3 | 12 | 10 | 54.5 | 12.92 | 8.70 | 59.8 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | |
Win Probability
ANA Favored
EDM Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
ANA
EDM
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
EDM Attempts
ANA Attempts
Individual Event Map
EDM ShootANA Shoot
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (ANA) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = ANA players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the ANA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| ANA ↓ / EDM → | Draisaitl | Savoie | McDavid | Roslovic | Nugent-Hopkins | Henrique | Lazar | Frederic | Janmark | Hyman | Mangiapane | Podkolzin | Walman | Nurse | Bouchard | Ekholm | Stastney | Emberson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McTavish | 50 | 56 | 53 | 38 | 53 | 88 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 36 | 36 | 45 | 52 | 50 | 63 | 64 | 41 | 44 |
| Poehling | 18 | 43 | 48 | 30 | 42 | 40 | 88 | 50 | — | 52 | 33 | 29 | 27 | 38 | 58 | 64 | 57 | 57 |
| Carlsson | 67 | 75 | 53 | 50 | 50 | 83 | 100 | 78 | — | 38 | 67 | 78 | 67 | 71 | 47 | 58 | 86 | 86 |
| Harkins | 50 | 71 | 57 | 45 | 57 | 50 | 25 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 56 | 33 | 36 | 56 | 56 |
| Washe | 44 | 50 | 100 | 33 | 100 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 14 | 50 | 50 | 42 | 22 | 14 | 50 | 38 |
| Killorn | 50 | 60 | 41 | 50 | 38 | 75 | 45 | 80 | 50 | 36 | 30 | 54 | 64 | 74 | 47 | 57 | 50 | 47 |
| Gauthier | 40 | 60 | 53 | 50 | 47 | 60 | 86 | 60 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 54 | 42 | 64 | 73 | 50 | 50 |
| Kreider | 44 | 64 | 50 | 38 | 47 | 50 | 100 | 57 | — | 44 | 67 | 43 | 46 | 43 | 60 | 65 | 50 | 43 |
| Viel | 17 | 13 | 54 | 25 | 45 | 75 | 40 | 60 | 0 | 57 | 33 | 60 | 36 | 25 | 56 | 58 | 38 | 38 |
| Johnston | 41 | 56 | 100 | 33 | 100 | — | 29 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 38 | 45 | 38 | 13 | 14 | 67 | 57 |
| Sennecke | 63 | 64 | 38 | 56 | 38 | 83 | 59 | 71 | 100 | 43 | 33 | 64 | 71 | 75 | 54 | 54 | 38 | 33 |
| Terry | 33 | 43 | 57 | 22 | 57 | 80 | 50 | 33 | — | 44 | 67 | 50 | 36 | 38 | 64 | 64 | 56 | 71 |
| LaCombe | 42 | 44 | 58 | 27 | 54 | 83 | 67 | 80 | 0 | 61 | 29 | 86 | 45 | 39 | 68 | 73 | 56 | 50 |
| Trouba | 33 | 27 | 54 | 27 | 50 | 67 | 44 | 60 | 0 | 61 | 25 | 63 | 46 | 40 | 50 | 63 | 56 | 50 |
| Mintyukov | 37 | 56 | 39 | 38 | 39 | 82 | 60 | 75 | 100 | 21 | 50 | 54 | 57 | 71 | 32 | 38 | 67 | 67 |
| Moore | 41 | 50 | 17 | 39 | 17 | 71 | 38 | 60 | 100 | 15 | 38 | 43 | 46 | 48 | 17 | 18 | 38 | 38 |
| Zellweger | 50 | 55 | 25 | 46 | 25 | 20 | 33 | 13 | 33 | 20 | 33 | 27 | 43 | 43 | 14 | 0 | 31 | 33 |
| Gudas | 50 | 57 | 20 | 50 | 20 | 50 | 57 | 33 | 33 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 44 | 29 | 20 | 50 | 50 |
