Game Recap
The Tampa Bay Lightning defeated the Toronto Maple Leafs 4-2 on February 25, 2026. The Tampa Bay Lightning controlled play with 60.2% Corsi and generated 9.79 expected goals compared to 6.64 from the Toronto Maple Leafs at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Tampa Bay Lightning created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 5 from the Toronto Maple Leafs at 5-on-5. Brayden Point scored 2 goals. The Tampa Bay Lightning outshot the Toronto Maple Leafs 36-34 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Toronto Maple Leafs vs Tampa Bay Lightning progressed on Feb 25, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
TOR2 - 4TBL
Feb 25, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| TBL | P1 | 24 | 14 | 63.2 | 17 | 11 | 60.7 | 4 | 8 | 33.3 | 17 | 10 | 63.0 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 3.05 | 2.22 | 57.9 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 32 | 21 | 60.4 | 25 | 18 | 58.1 | 20 | 14 | 58.8 | 21 | 17 | 55.3 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 5.99 | 4.90 | 55.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 20 | 24 | 45.5 | 17 | 19 | 47.2 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | 4.30 | 3.21 | 57.3 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 76 | 59 | 56.3 | 59 | 48 | 55.1 | 36 | 34 | 51.4 | 52 | 38 | 57.8 | 14 | 8 | 63.6 | 13.35 | 10.34 | 56.4 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | |
| TOR | P1 | 14 | 24 | 36.8 | 11 | 17 | 39.3 | 8 | 4 | 66.7 | 10 | 17 | 37.0 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 2.22 | 3.05 | 42.1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 21 | 32 | 39.6 | 18 | 25 | 41.9 | 14 | 20 | 41.2 | 17 | 21 | 44.7 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 4.90 | 5.99 | 45.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 24 | 20 | 54.5 | 19 | 17 | 52.8 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 3.21 | 4.30 | 42.7 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 59 | 76 | 43.7 | 48 | 59 | 44.9 | 34 | 36 | 48.6 | 38 | 52 | 42.2 | 8 | 14 | 36.4 | 10.34 | 13.35 | 43.6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
TBL Favored
TOR Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
TBL
TOR
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
TOR Attempts
TBL Attempts
Individual Event Map
TOR ShootTBL Shoot
Save
Goal Against
Missed Shot Against
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (TBL) performed against every skater on the away team (TOR) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = TBL players, Columns = TOR players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the TBL player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| TBL ↓ / TOR → | Matthews | Roy | Domi | Tavares | McMann | Laughton | Lorentz | Jarnkrok | Knies | Robertson | Maccelli | Nylander | Ekman-Larsson | Rielly | Carlo | McCabe | Stecher | Benoit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guentzel | 55 | 50 | 100 | 60 | 55 | 71 | 64 | 70 | 54 | 38 | 50 | 67 | 77 | 31 | 65 | 80 | 72 | 68 |
| Point | 33 | 79 | 33 | 44 | 50 | 86 | 84 | 100 | 53 | 88 | 59 | 42 | 52 | 56 | 83 | 71 | 93 | 88 |
| Gourde | 43 | 29 | 29 | 27 | 45 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 10 | 0 | 40 | 24 | 35 | 60 | 50 | 67 | 50 |
| Girgensons | 43 | 40 | 32 | 40 | 39 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 13 | 33 | 46 | 28 | 31 | 67 | 55 | 69 | 83 |
| James | 50 | 60 | 100 | 46 | 33 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 55 | 45 | 53 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 60 | 67 | 60 | 31 |
| Goncalves | 80 | 63 | 100 | 55 | 71 | 83 | 100 | 100 | 71 | 71 | 50 | 55 | 58 | 88 | 100 | 69 | 67 | 50 |
| Hagel | 50 | 55 | 54 | 41 | 70 | 88 | 78 | 100 | 43 | 47 | 60 | 48 | 58 | 53 | 67 | 73 | 76 | 67 |
| Kucherov | 40 | 73 | 40 | 42 | 50 | 85 | 83 | 100 | 53 | 80 | 59 | 42 | 50 | 58 | 84 | 71 | 82 | 81 |
| Holmberg | 50 | 100 | 47 | 83 | 71 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 57 | 50 | 67 | 60 | 82 | 86 |
| Bjorkstrand | 0 | 83 | 100 | 57 | 100 | 67 | 60 | 67 | 75 | 86 | 67 | 57 | 89 | 14 | 63 | 81 | 70 | 91 |
| Sabourin | — | 80 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 20 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 63 |
| Raddysh | 41 | 71 | 33 | 44 | 43 | 89 | 88 | 100 | 53 | 71 | 53 | 45 | 53 | 50 | 85 | 69 | 67 | 78 |
| Moser | 38 | 82 | 40 | 44 | 64 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 47 | 86 | 58 | 44 | 50 | 57 | 82 | 61 | 67 | 85 |
| D'Astous | 100 | 69 | 100 | 60 | 90 | 70 | 70 | 67 | 67 | 64 | 67 | 67 | 74 | 60 | 71 | 85 | 86 | 69 |
| Cernak | 33 | 45 | 35 | 11 | 54 | 67 | 25 | 50 | 21 | 25 | 25 | 31 | 25 | 32 | 43 | 63 | 73 | 20 |
| McDonagh | 35 | 44 | 30 | 50 | 38 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 10 | 33 | 60 | 29 | 29 | 20 | 56 | 75 | 50 |
| Hedman | 80 | 50 | 100 | 29 | 67 | 29 | 33 | 40 | 54 | 54 | 29 | 38 | 46 | 38 | 56 | 60 | 67 | 47 |
| Lilleberg | 80 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 44 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 44 | 46 | 70 | 60 | 67 | 83 | 78 | 100 | 100 |
