Game Recap
The Utah Mammoth defeated the Detroit Red Wings 4-1 on February 4, 2026. The Utah Mammoth controlled play with 42.0% Corsi and generated 7.09 expected goals compared to 5.45 from the Detroit Red Wings at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Utah Mammoth created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 8 from the Detroit Red Wings at 5-on-5. Barrett Hayton was the most dangerous skater with 1.48 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Detroit Red Wings outshot the Utah Mammoth 30-25 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Detroit Red Wings vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Feb 4, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
DET1 - 4UTA
Feb 4, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| UTA | P1 | 18 | 14 | 56.3 | 16 | 12 | 57.1 | 9 | 6 | 60.0 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 3.55 | 2.63 | 57.4 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 16 | 28 | 36.4 | 12 | 20 | 37.5 | 9 | 11 | 45.0 | 15 | 20 | 42.9 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | 2.97 | 3.52 | 45.7 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 13 | 28 | 31.7 | 12 | 21 | 36.4 | 7 | 13 | 35.0 | 10 | 19 | 34.5 | 6 | 10 | 37.5 | 3.43 | 3.94 | 46.6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| Total | 47 | 70 | 40.2 | 40 | 53 | 43.0 | 25 | 30 | 45.5 | 38 | 47 | 44.7 | 16 | 17 | 48.5 | 9.95 | 10.09 | 49.6 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | |
| DET | P1 | 14 | 18 | 43.8 | 12 | 16 | 42.9 | 6 | 9 | 40.0 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 2.63 | 3.55 | 42.6 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 28 | 16 | 63.6 | 20 | 12 | 62.5 | 11 | 9 | 55.0 | 20 | 15 | 57.1 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | 3.52 | 2.97 | 54.3 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 28 | 13 | 68.3 | 21 | 12 | 63.6 | 13 | 7 | 65.0 | 19 | 10 | 65.5 | 10 | 6 | 62.5 | 3.94 | 3.43 | 53.4 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| Total | 70 | 47 | 59.8 | 53 | 40 | 57.0 | 30 | 25 | 54.5 | 47 | 38 | 55.3 | 17 | 16 | 51.5 | 10.09 | 9.95 | 50.4 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | |
Win Probability
UTA Favored
DET Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
UTA
DET
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
DET Attempts
UTA Attempts
Individual Event Map
DET ShootUTA Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (DET) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = UTA players, Columns = DET players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| UTA ↓ / DET → | Larkin | Copp | Appleton | Kasper | Finnie | Rasmussen | Raymond | Compher | van Riemsdyk | Soderblom | DeBrincat | Kane | Seider | Johansson | Chiarot | Sandin-Pellikka | Bernard-Docker | Hamonic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schmaltz | 52 | 47 | 45 | 54 | 25 | 75 | 55 | 50 | 36 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 71 | 62 | 39 | 38 | 50 | 60 |
| McBain | 29 | 35 | 38 | 18 | 40 | — | 29 | 42 | 22 | — | 42 | 40 | 44 | 18 | 38 | 35 | 15 | 25 |
| Stenlund | 6 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 67 | 33 | 6 | 60 | 25 | 33 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 67 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Hayton | 67 | 70 | 57 | 83 | 33 | 75 | 75 | 53 | 67 | 50 | 70 | 57 | 59 | 71 | 60 | 50 | 33 | 75 |
| O'Brien | 100 | 0 | 67 | — | 75 | 33 | 100 | 67 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
| Crouse | 27 | 40 | 33 | 47 | 60 | 75 | 27 | 75 | 57 | 50 | 16 | 16 | 32 | 60 | 46 | 60 | 38 | 29 |
| Carcone | 0 | 47 | 63 | 25 | 80 | — | 0 | 83 | — | — | 45 | 45 | 47 | 75 | 54 | 60 | 17 | 33 |
| Tanev | 100 | — | 100 | — | 100 | 33 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 33 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| Guenther | 43 | 54 | 82 | 70 | 67 | — | 50 | 90 | 67 | 0 | 47 | 44 | 67 | 86 | 53 | 47 | 30 | 75 |
| Keller | 56 | 75 | 83 | 62 | 67 | 75 | 58 | 86 | 57 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 79 | 79 | 55 | 64 | 57 | 50 |
| Peterka | 0 | 30 | 27 | 25 | 25 | 75 | 0 | 30 | 63 | 50 | 50 | 36 | 17 | 50 | 33 | 44 | 0 | 60 |
| Yamamoto | 0 | 33 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 75 | 0 | 25 | 63 | 50 | 60 | 43 | 13 | 47 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 63 |
| Sergachev | 24 | 56 | 80 | 73 | 71 | 67 | 28 | 82 | 56 | 67 | 21 | 23 | 50 | 78 | 44 | 47 | 67 | 43 |
| Durzi | 50 | 42 | 42 | 44 | 50 | 43 | 57 | 50 | 38 | 43 | 43 | 47 | 69 | 45 | 35 | 35 | 33 | 40 |
| Cole | 13 | 33 | 50 | 17 | 55 | 86 | 13 | 50 | 70 | 67 | 30 | 17 | 17 | 62 | 50 | 57 | 14 | 60 |
| Marino | 46 | 38 | 11 | 33 | 20 | 100 | 46 | 11 | 22 | 33 | 56 | 53 | 37 | 31 | 40 | 42 | 27 | 0 |
| Schmidt | 50 | 40 | 14 | 36 | 25 | 100 | 50 | 13 | 14 | 100 | 54 | 50 | 33 | 36 | 46 | 47 | 20 | 0 |
| DeSimone | 33 | 30 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 63 | 25 | 44 | 60 | 17 | 60 | 33 | 17 | 54 | 57 | 50 | 0 | 71 |
