Toronto Maple Leafs vs Edmonton Oilers — February 3, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Edmonton Oilers fell to the Toronto Maple Leafs 5-2 on Tuesday. Ryan Nugent-Hopkins generated the most offense at even strength with 1.86 ixG on 2 shots. EDM held a slight 9-7 edge in high-danger chances. Dig into the 5-on-5 data, and EDM had the better of it (9.56 xG to 7.04). Sometimes the bounces just don't go your way. Matias Maccelli found the net 2 times. Shots on goal: EDM 36, TOR 27.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Toronto Maple Leafs vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Feb 3, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

TOR5 - 2EDM

Feb 3, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
EDM	P1	22	15	59.5	12	11	52.2	9	8	52.9	16	14	53.3	3	3	50.0	2.66	2.24	54.2	0	0	—
	P2	29	20	59.2	24	17	58.5	17	12	58.6	17	16	51.5	4	3	57.1	5.34	4.09	56.6	1	2	33.3
	P3	17	12	58.6	11	10	52.4	10	7	58.8	11	7	61.1	2	4	33.3	2.14	2.05	51.1	1	3	25.0
	Total	68	47	59.1	47	38	55.3	36	27	57.1	44	37	54.3	9	10	47.4	10.14	8.39	54.7	2	5	28.6
TOR	P1	15	22	40.5	11	12	47.8	8	9	47.1	14	16	46.7	3	3	50.0	2.24	2.66	45.8	0	0	—
	P2	20	29	40.8	17	24	41.5	12	17	41.4	16	17	48.5	3	4	42.9	4.09	5.34	43.4	2	1	66.7
	P3	12	17	41.4	10	11	47.6	7	10	41.2	7	11	38.9	4	2	66.7	2.05	2.14	48.9	3	1	75.0
	Total	47	68	40.9	38	47	44.7	27	36	42.9	37	44	45.7	10	9	52.6	8.39	10.14	45.3	5	2	71.4

Win Probability

EDM Favored

TOR Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

EDM

TOR

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

TOR Attempts

EDM Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

TOR ShootEDM Shoot

Shot on Net

Hit

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (TOR) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = EDM players, Columns = TOR players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

EDM ↓ / TOR →	Matthews	McMann	Domi	Tavares	Laughton	Roy	Lorentz	Jarnkrok	Knies	Maccelli	Robertson	Nylander	Ekman-Larsson	Stecher	McCabe	Carlo	Benoit	Myers
Draisaitl	57	63	63	67	69	88	75	67	71	58	50	59	68	65	53	56	80	—
McDavid	45	48	38	55	60	50	60	33	33	54	33	58	50	20	50	57	75	—
Nugent-Hopkins	43	58	45	46	67	100	67	50	0	50	0	56	44	40	56	68	50	—
Roslovic	60	63	80	100	58	64	73	75	56	100	57	50	55	54	60	80	77	67
Frederic	56	44	57	17	50	64	75	100	60	0	67	14	50	35	29	50	75	100
Savoie	0	0	0	67	63	67	88	83	60	33	50	67	67	67	33	50	73	67
Janmark	56	50	57	25	56	64	67	67	60	0	63	22	47	33	45	67	71	100
Samanski	—	—	—	75	80	63	100	100	63	100	57	75	100	100	50	50	70	67
Hyman	48	50	40	64	60	50	60	33	50	58	0	78	56	22	52	60	75	—
Mangiapane	25	0	0	14	43	43	60	60	43	0	50	13	31	27	33	50	0	100
Podkolzin	86	88	100	67	80	100	100	100	75	70	0	69	69	78	100	80	100	100
Kapanen	83	83	100	67	75	100	100	100	83	67	80	67	67	71	100	75	100	100
Bouchard	38	50	40	44	69	82	71	67	50	50	50	50	61	58	43	52	75	100
Ekholm	37	50	42	46	64	75	75	67	40	45	33	50	62	64	29	40	88	100
Nurse	57	46	50	63	44	75	63	57	67	54	60	59	41	39	79	80	89	83
Walman	57	53	58	46	50	60	57	57	50	30	40	38	38	37	69	79	63	57
Emberson	67	67	63	50	60	56	100	100	56	50	57	50	69	44	43	67	71	67
Stastney	63	63	63	50	60	71	100	100	71	50	75	50	67	40	38	75	82	100