Game Recap
After a back-and-forth affair, the Tampa Bay Lightning pulled out a 4-3 win in overtime on Tuesday. High-danger chances favored TBL by a wide margin: 13 to 6. At 5-on-5, TBL carried the play with 7.86 expected goals and a 60.8% share of shot attempts. Mattias Samuelsson found the net 2 times.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Buffalo Sabres vs Tampa Bay Lightning progressed on Feb 3, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
BUF3 - 4TBL (OT)
Feb 3, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| TBL | P1 | 21 | 18 | 53.8 | 16 | 15 | 51.6 | 13 | 9 | 59.1 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 6 | 4 | 60.0 | 3.58 | 2.28 | 61.1 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 12 | 58.6 | 15 | 7 | 68.2 | 10 | 4 | 71.4 | 8 | 6 | 57.1 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 2.63 | 1.85 | 58.7 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 18 | 14 | 56.3 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 13 | 10 | 56.5 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 3.56 | 1.97 | 64.4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | |
| OT | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.85 | 0.99 | 46.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 59 | 49 | 54.6 | 49 | 38 | 56.3 | 35 | 26 | 57.4 | 38 | 31 | 55.1 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 10.62 | 7.09 | 60.0 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | |
| BUF | P1 | 18 | 21 | 46.2 | 15 | 16 | 48.4 | 9 | 13 | 40.9 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 4 | 6 | 40.0 | 2.28 | 3.58 | 38.9 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 12 | 17 | 41.4 | 7 | 15 | 31.8 | 4 | 10 | 28.6 | 6 | 8 | 42.9 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 1.85 | 2.63 | 41.3 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 14 | 18 | 43.8 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 10 | 13 | 43.5 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 1.97 | 3.56 | 35.6 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | |
| OT | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.99 | 0.85 | 54.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 49 | 59 | 45.4 | 38 | 49 | 43.7 | 26 | 35 | 42.6 | 31 | 38 | 44.9 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 7.09 | 10.62 | 40.0 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | |
Win Probability
TBL Favored
BUF Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
TBL
BUF
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
BUF Attempts
TBL Attempts
Individual Event Map
BUF ShootTBL Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (TBL) performed against every skater on the away team (BUF) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = TBL players, Columns = BUF players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the TBL player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| TBL ↓ / BUF → | McLeod | Thompson | Krebs | Helenius | Ostlund | Kozak | Zucker | Malenstyn | Quinn | Tuch | Doan | Rosen | Dahlin | Samuelsson | Byram | Power | Bryson | Metsa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guentzel | 71 | 27 | 40 | 67 | 78 | 71 | 52 | 60 | 52 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 43 | 79 | 69 | 63 | 83 | 67 |
| Gourde | 31 | 71 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 44 | 80 | 0 | 50 | 75 | 27 | 30 | 80 | 83 |
| Girgensons | 20 | 69 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 44 | 50 | 0 | 40 | 75 | 22 | 33 | 80 | 83 |
| Goncalves | 75 | 100 | 100 | 71 | 75 | 67 | 100 | 60 | 50 | 100 | 71 | 50 | 55 | 71 | 75 | 80 | 100 | 100 |
| James | 100 | 57 | 50 | 63 | 75 | 57 | 100 | 60 | 100 | 60 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 57 | 80 | 75 | 75 |
| Finley | 80 | 75 | 100 | 44 | 44 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 57 | 100 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 62 | 69 | 33 | 50 |
| Douglas | 80 | — | 100 | 50 | 44 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 67 | — | 50 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 56 | 67 | 33 | 60 |
| Hagel | 71 | 24 | 33 | 67 | 80 | 71 | 50 | 60 | 52 | 50 | 52 | 0 | 44 | 74 | 63 | 60 | 83 | 67 |
| Kucherov | 77 | 36 | 40 | 71 | 89 | 86 | 72 | 75 | 76 | 53 | 91 | — | 58 | 75 | 77 | 67 | 83 | 67 |
| Bjorkstrand | 100 | 80 | 80 | 50 | 75 | 60 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 91 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 75 | 73 | 85 | 80 | 67 |
| Holmberg | 29 | 71 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 40 | 59 | 67 | — | 44 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 71 |
| Sabourin | 80 | — | 100 | 44 | 44 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 67 | — | 44 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 45 | 55 | 33 | 50 |
| Raddysh | 69 | 57 | 55 | 64 | 75 | 64 | 58 | 50 | 64 | 67 | 79 | 20 | 59 | 70 | 71 | 60 | 50 | 50 |
| Moser | 50 | 27 | 30 | 58 | 69 | 43 | 50 | 33 | 56 | 38 | 69 | 20 | 41 | 56 | 58 | 50 | 40 | 40 |
| McDonagh | 50 | 56 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 47 | 67 | 43 | 65 | 29 | 17 | 35 | 82 | 50 | 67 | 91 | 89 |
| Cernak | 56 | 48 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 52 | 100 | 48 | 53 | 29 | 20 | 25 | 83 | 56 | 67 | 90 | 88 |
| Hedman | 62 | 0 | 20 | 55 | 60 | 33 | 67 | 100 | 62 | 0 | 50 | — | 29 | 60 | 50 | 61 | 100 | 75 |
| Carlile | 50 | 0 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 29 | 40 | 36 | 50 | 50 | 60 |
