Vancouver Canucks vs Utah Mammoth — February 2, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Utah Mammoth defeated the Vancouver Canucks 6-2 on February 2, 2026. The Utah Mammoth controlled play with 51.2% Corsi and generated 6.51 expected goals compared to 5.59 from the Vancouver Canucks at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Vancouver Canucks created 7 high-danger scoring chances compared to 6 from the Utah Mammoth at 5-on-5. Nick Schmaltz recorded a hat trick with 3 goals. Lawson Crouse was the most dangerous skater with 1.20 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Vancouver Canucks outshot the Utah Mammoth 24-19 in total shots on goal.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Vancouver Canucks vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Feb 2, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

VAN2 - 6UTA

Feb 2, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
UTA	P1	18	12	60.0	16	10	61.5	8	6	57.1	12	7	63.2	2	2	50.0	3.01	2.01	59.9	2	1	66.7
	P2	17	15	53.1	9	10	47.4	7	8	46.7	13	12	52.0	2	5	28.6	2.57	1.98	56.5	3	1	75.0
	P3	11	17	39.3	9	14	39.1	4	10	28.6	9	10	47.4	2	2	50.0	1.47	2.39	38.2	1	0	100.0
	Total	46	44	51.1	34	34	50.0	19	24	44.2	34	29	54.0	6	9	40.0	7.05	6.38	52.5	6	2	75.0
VAN	P1	12	18	40.0	10	16	38.5	6	8	42.9	7	12	36.8	2	2	50.0	2.01	3.01	40.1	1	2	33.3
	P2	15	17	46.9	10	9	52.6	8	7	53.3	12	13	48.0	5	2	71.4	1.98	2.57	43.5	1	3	25.0
	P3	17	11	60.7	14	9	60.9	10	4	71.4	10	9	52.6	2	2	50.0	2.39	1.47	61.8	0	1	0.0
	Total	44	46	48.9	34	34	50.0	24	19	55.8	29	34	46.0	9	6	60.0	6.38	7.05	47.5	2	6	25.0

Win Probability

UTA Favored

VAN Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

UTA

VAN

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

VAN Attempts

UTA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

VAN ShootUTA Shoot

Shot on Net

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (VAN) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = UTA players, Columns = VAN players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

UTA ↓ / VAN →	Blueger	Kampf	Karlsson	Pettersson	Sasson	Chytil	Kane	DeBrusk	Ohgren	O'Connor	Garland	Lekkerimäki	Myers	Pettersson	Hronek	Joseph	Pettersson	Willander
Schmaltz	50	47	44	55	57	80	50	28	0	53	50	80	50	48	44	67	53	100
Hayton	43	69	50	50	75	75	57	83	50	60	57	50	61	50	50	45	76	75
Stenlund	33	50	25	40	100	0	50	40	29	100	0	78	50	50	20	60	100	50
McBain	44	80	67	78	75	67	73	67	38	50	40	86	70	50	75	67	69	70
O'Brien	0	50	0	50	100	0	67	50	0	100	0	100	50	0	0	50	100	67
Crouse	33	33	36	50	50	75	50	30	25	45	0	71	27	44	48	67	42	75
Carcone	56	57	40	78	75	100	83	67	56	33	44	89	70	45	71	86	69	70
Tanev	0	50	0	50	100	0	67	50	0	100	0	100	60	0	0	57	100	67
Keller	75	44	47	67	50	100	64	29	0	56	67	100	53	52	50	100	50	100
Peterka	25	75	67	40	71	73	40	100	57	73	20	67	67	71	33	50	71	70
Yamamoto	25	67	55	33	60	73	33	100	50	50	25	67	54	0	0	50	67	67
Guenther	60	80	67	80	100	100	85	71	50	75	56	89	100	63	71	86	73	73
Sergachev	67	38	31	75	62	67	73	35	63	56	44	80	54	47	62	71	57	64
Marino	33	63	53	50	67	63	56	45	20	64	43	71	54	60	47	25	71	77
Schmidt	25	55	36	33	100	56	40	50	13	50	27	50	30	25	36	20	78	78
Durzi	67	43	25	71	50	80	90	21	67	50	50	70	56	43	56	89	41	56
Cole	13	71	50	50	100	67	33	71	11	33	11	75	44	25	38	67	60	60
DeSimone	50	90	100	75	83	100	80	83	60	89	33	100	83	77	57	86	78	100