Dallas Stars vs Utah Mammoth — January 31, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Dallas Stars defeated the Utah Mammoth 3-2 on January 31, 2026. Kailer Yamamoto found the net 2 times. At 5-on-5, DAL carried the play with 6.46 expected goals and a 57.5% share of shot attempts.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Dallas Stars vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Jan 31, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

DAL3 - 2UTA

Jan 31, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
UTA	P1	14	20	41.2	10	16	38.5	5	10	33.3	11	15	42.3	2	4	33.3	2.04	4.72	30.1	1	3	25.0
	P2	13	18	41.9	7	15	31.8	5	11	31.3	11	4	73.3	2	2	50.0	1.31	1.42	48.0	0	0	—
	P3	13	23	36.1	9	19	32.1	4	11	26.7	8	16	33.3	4	5	44.4	2.09	4.95	29.7	1	0	100.0
	Total	40	61	39.6	26	50	34.2	14	32	30.4	30	35	46.2	8	11	42.1	5.43	11.09	32.9	2	3	40.0
DAL	P1	20	14	58.8	16	10	61.5	10	5	66.7	15	11	57.7	4	2	66.7	4.72	2.04	69.9	3	1	75.0
	P2	18	13	58.1	15	7	68.2	11	5	68.8	4	11	26.7	2	2	50.0	1.42	1.31	52.0	0	0	—
	P3	23	13	63.9	19	9	67.9	11	4	73.3	16	8	66.7	5	4	55.6	4.95	2.09	70.3	0	1	0.0
	Total	61	40	60.4	50	26	65.8	32	14	69.6	35	30	53.8	11	8	57.9	11.09	5.43	67.1	3	2	60.0

Win Probability

UTA Favored

DAL Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

UTA

DAL

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

DAL Attempts

UTA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

DAL ShootUTA Shoot

Shot on Net

Hit

Shot Blocked

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (DAL) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = UTA players, Columns = DAL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

UTA ↓ / DAL →	Johnston	Hintz	Hryckowian	Bourque	Steel	Duchene	Bäck	Faksa	Robertson	Benn	Erne	Rantanen	Heiskanen	Lindell	Harley	Lundkvist	Petrovic	Capobianco
Schmaltz	18	71	14	50	0	33	44	67	64	33	20	22	57	57	24	25	75	0
McBain	33	55	29	40	64	46	50	50	38	50	0	29	44	38	11	25	59	56
Hayton	36	40	30	50	33	25	67	56	40	43	25	31	54	50	39	41	0	0
Stenlund	23	18	0	43	25	20	0	0	22	33	0	15	28	50	33	20	0	20
Carcone	29	44	33	45	69	64	100	100	40	64	—	20	38	38	60	50	59	56
Crouse	17	29	33	60	20	43	33	50	41	33	25	14	27	67	36	14	67	33
But	67	33	0	43	67	33	33	0	43	50	0	50	57	57	60	33	20	20
Tanev	50	20	0	20	50	33	0	0	20	50	0	50	50	50	33	33	0	0
Guenther	29	50	29	57	58	67	100	67	50	67	0	17	64	64	29	33	60	55
Peterka	29	50	23	57	33	25	50	38	56	43	22	25	43	36	40	38	50	33
Keller	13	71	20	75	0	40	50	80	78	25	25	17	64	69	27	29	75	0
Yamamoto	36	33	30	33	43	25	50	60	33	43	33	33	40	36	47	50	0	0
Sergachev	26	29	50	50	29	25	57	100	28	38	20	30	40	67	43	50	29	11
Schmidt	33	50	15	54	0	33	50	50	57	44	0	21	50	43	29	20	50	33
Marino	38	50	25	46	13	33	67	40	50	45	20	27	46	43	32	29	50	33
Cole	8	24	0	38	58	46	33	33	24	46	20	8	26	33	22	13	64	64
Durzi	33	38	50	44	67	20	33	67	30	33	17	36	40	63	27	57	44	25
DeSimone	0	46	0	46	53	46	29	30	46	46	22	0	42	42	20	20	64	64