Game Recap
The Edmonton Oilers defeated the San Jose Sharks 4-3 in overtime on January 29, 2026. The Edmonton Oilers controlled play with 61.3% Corsi and generated 6.31 expected goals compared to 5.22 from the San Jose Sharks at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Edmonton Oilers created 6 high-danger scoring chances compared to 5 from the San Jose Sharks at 5-on-5. Leon Draisaitl was the most dangerous skater with 1.89 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Edmonton Oilers outshot the San Jose Sharks 32-21 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as San Jose Sharks vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Jan 29, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
SJS3 - 4EDM (OT)
Jan 29, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| EDM | P1 | 17 | 11 | 60.7 | 16 | 8 | 66.7 | 12 | 8 | 60.0 | 11 | 9 | 55.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 2.56 | 1.67 | 60.6 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 15 | 17 | 46.9 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 8 | 9 | 47.1 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 1.50 | 2.57 | 36.8 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 28 | 8 | 77.8 | 18 | 6 | 75.0 | 10 | 4 | 71.4 | 23 | 5 | 82.1 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 5.59 | 1.45 | 79.5 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| OT | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.31 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 62 | 36 | 63.3 | 46 | 28 | 62.2 | 32 | 21 | 60.4 | 44 | 27 | 62.0 | 10 | 5 | 66.7 | 9.96 | 5.69 | 63.7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | |
| SJS | P1 | 11 | 17 | 39.3 | 8 | 16 | 33.3 | 8 | 12 | 40.0 | 9 | 11 | 45.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 1.67 | 2.56 | 39.4 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 15 | 53.1 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 9 | 8 | 52.9 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 2.57 | 1.50 | 63.2 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 8 | 28 | 22.2 | 6 | 18 | 25.0 | 4 | 10 | 28.6 | 5 | 23 | 17.9 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 1.45 | 5.59 | 20.5 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| OT | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 36 | 62 | 36.7 | 28 | 46 | 37.8 | 21 | 32 | 39.6 | 27 | 44 | 38.0 | 5 | 10 | 33.3 | 5.69 | 9.96 | 36.3 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | |
Win Probability
EDM Favored
SJS Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
EDM
SJS
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
SJS Attempts
EDM Attempts
Individual Event Map
SJS ShootEDM Shoot
Goal
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (SJS) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = EDM players, Columns = SJS players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| EDM ↓ / SJS → | Celebrini | Smith | Wennberg | Goodrow | Toffoli | Ostapchuk | Misa | Eklund | Regenda | Graf | Gaudette | Reaves | Liljegren | Ferraro | Orlov | Klingberg | Desharnais | Dickinson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draisaitl | 78 | 74 | 86 | 63 | 77 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 62 | 87 | 67 | 0 | 77 | 74 | 81 | 64 | 83 | 67 |
| McDavid | 62 | 53 | 72 | 71 | 67 | 67 | 50 | 71 | 40 | 83 | 60 | — | 70 | 64 | 82 | 40 | 82 | 63 |
| Nugent-Hopkins | 59 | 53 | 71 | 86 | 0 | 60 | 20 | 43 | 50 | 75 | 57 | 50 | 71 | 38 | 87 | 29 | 64 | 60 |
| Roslovic | 78 | 75 | 78 | 75 | 50 | 33 | 38 | 58 | 75 | 80 | 56 | 0 | 64 | 60 | 70 | 57 | 63 | 57 |
| Janmark | 43 | 50 | 56 | 33 | 43 | 25 | 0 | 50 | 80 | 80 | — | 33 | 86 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 33 |
| Frederic | 75 | 80 | 83 | 33 | 75 | 25 | 0 | 50 | 80 | 80 | — | 33 | 86 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 33 |
| Lazar | 43 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 20 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 75 | — | 33 | 83 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 33 |
| Savoie | 100 | 100 | 60 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 40 | 40 | 67 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 67 | 75 | 67 | 60 | 67 | 50 |
| Samanski | 100 | 100 | 60 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 40 | 67 | 100 | 50 | 67 | 60 | 75 | 40 | 40 | 67 | 50 |
| Hyman | 63 | 57 | 92 | 71 | 75 | 50 | 20 | 43 | 67 | 70 | 50 | 0 | 71 | 56 | 76 | 43 | 62 | 44 |
| Kapanen | 65 | 60 | 79 | 50 | 63 | 50 | 40 | 70 | 58 | 75 | 67 | 33 | 65 | 68 | 64 | 63 | 60 | 56 |
| Podkolzin | 83 | 82 | 82 | 67 | 50 | 60 | 0 | 57 | 67 | 86 | 50 | 60 | 73 | 79 | 64 | 63 | 67 | 60 |
| Nurse | 63 | 63 | 65 | 67 | 63 | 43 | 25 | 50 | 55 | 75 | 43 | 50 | 72 | 73 | 45 | 27 | 69 | 56 |
| Bouchard | 71 | 65 | 73 | 71 | 67 | 75 | 50 | 71 | 33 | 89 | 60 | 100 | 74 | 67 | 82 | 44 | 88 | 71 |
| Ekholm | 70 | 65 | 78 | 50 | 71 | 75 | 50 | 71 | 43 | 79 | 75 | 50 | 74 | 73 | 71 | 43 | 67 | 43 |
| Walman | 65 | 63 | 69 | 100 | 57 | 60 | 29 | 55 | 63 | 68 | 40 | 100 | 72 | 71 | 60 | 50 | 60 | 44 |
| Emberson | 33 | 33 | 62 | 29 | 38 | 0 | 20 | 33 | 86 | 100 | 50 | 20 | 44 | 50 | 60 | 42 | 40 | 33 |
| Stastney | 33 | 33 | 64 | 33 | 38 | 0 | 25 | 40 | 88 | 100 | 60 | 25 | 44 | 50 | 67 | 45 | 60 | 50 |
