Game Recap
The Carolina Hurricanes defeated the Utah Mammoth 5-4 on January 29, 2026. Expected goals were closely matched at 5-on-5 (CAR 8.65, UTA 7.94), making this a tightly contested game on both sides of the puck. The Carolina Hurricanes created 16 high-danger scoring chances compared to 9 from the Utah Mammoth at 5-on-5. Shayne Gostisbehere scored 2 goals. Kailer Yamamoto scored 2 goals. Andrei Svechnikov scored 2 goals. The Carolina Hurricanes outshot the Utah Mammoth 33-25 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Carolina Hurricanes progressed on Jan 29, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
UTA4 - 5CAR
Jan 29, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| CAR | P1 | 19 | 14 | 57.6 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 9 | 8 | 52.9 | 15 | 9 | 62.5 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | 2.87 | 3.13 | 47.8 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 18 | 52.6 | 14 | 16 | 46.7 | 10 | 13 | 43.5 | 13 | 14 | 48.1 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | 3.06 | 3.25 | 48.4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| P3 | 31 | 11 | 73.8 | 23 | 8 | 74.2 | 14 | 4 | 77.8 | 22 | 9 | 71.0 | 6 | 6 | 50.0 | 4.65 | 2.23 | 67.6 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| Total | 70 | 43 | 61.9 | 51 | 35 | 59.3 | 33 | 25 | 56.9 | 50 | 32 | 61.0 | 17 | 11 | 60.7 | 10.58 | 8.62 | 55.1 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | |
| UTA | P1 | 14 | 19 | 42.4 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 8 | 9 | 47.1 | 9 | 15 | 37.5 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 3.13 | 2.87 | 52.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 18 | 20 | 47.4 | 16 | 14 | 53.3 | 13 | 10 | 56.5 | 14 | 13 | 51.9 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 3.25 | 3.06 | 51.6 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| P3 | 11 | 31 | 26.2 | 8 | 23 | 25.8 | 4 | 14 | 22.2 | 9 | 22 | 29.0 | 6 | 6 | 50.0 | 2.23 | 4.65 | 32.4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
| Total | 43 | 70 | 38.1 | 35 | 51 | 40.7 | 25 | 33 | 43.1 | 32 | 50 | 39.0 | 11 | 17 | 39.3 | 8.62 | 10.58 | 44.9 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | |
Win Probability
CAR Favored
UTA Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
CAR
UTA
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
UTA Attempts
CAR Attempts
Individual Event Map
UTA ShootCAR Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CAR) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = CAR players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the CAR player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| CAR ↓ / UTA → | Schmaltz | McBain | Hayton | Stenlund | O'Brien | Crouse | Carcone | But | Tanev | Keller | Peterka | Yamamoto | Sergachev | Durzi | Schmidt | Marino | Cole | DeSimone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aho | 75 | 85 | 88 | 100 | 100 | 92 | 100 | 100 | — | 71 | 92 | 57 | 79 | 76 | 93 | 94 | 90 | 0 |
| Jarvis | 75 | 83 | 88 | 100 | 100 | 92 | 100 | 100 | — | 70 | 92 | 50 | 79 | 75 | 93 | 93 | 90 | 0 |
| Staal | 67 | 85 | 32 | 100 | 100 | 79 | 75 | 35 | — | 62 | 50 | 90 | 68 | 71 | 57 | 57 | 65 | 64 |
| Stankoven | 50 | 41 | 50 | 78 | 71 | 100 | 38 | 67 | 80 | 50 | 50 | 23 | 33 | 57 | 60 | 63 | 43 | 40 |
| Kotkaniemi | 0 | 0 | — | 38 | 38 | 0 | 0 | — | 38 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 29 | 33 |
| Martinook | 64 | 85 | 32 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 75 | 38 | — | 55 | 52 | 90 | 60 | 71 | 54 | 54 | 54 | 64 |
| Ehlers | 88 | 88 | 35 | 100 | — | 89 | 86 | 35 | — | 80 | 52 | 90 | 81 | 82 | 58 | 58 | 63 | 55 |
| Hall | 100 | 44 | 67 | 89 | 75 | 100 | 41 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 0 | 29 | 57 | 67 | 60 | 65 | 57 | 40 |
| Carrier | 36 | 25 | 50 | 45 | 50 | 33 | 0 | 67 | 44 | 22 | 80 | 0 | 8 | 23 | 83 | 83 | 33 | 56 |
| Jankowski | 44 | 67 | 100 | 44 | 38 | 38 | 0 | 100 | 38 | 17 | 100 | 0 | 36 | 10 | 100 | 100 | 55 | 33 |
| Svechnikov | 77 | 77 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 87 | 67 | 86 | 100 | 72 | 100 | 50 | 81 | 67 | 93 | 93 | 90 | 0 |
| Blake | 67 | 44 | 50 | 83 | 71 | 100 | 41 | 50 | 80 | 80 | 0 | 29 | 50 | 63 | 65 | 67 | 50 | 40 |
| Slavin | 69 | 92 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 81 | 86 | 50 | 100 | 69 | 67 | 80 | 70 | 72 | 79 | 80 | 80 | 100 |
| Chatfield | 65 | 92 | 40 | 50 | 0 | 78 | 86 | 50 | — | 63 | 67 | 80 | 65 | 71 | 76 | 76 | 50 | 100 |
| Gostisbehere | 45 | 56 | 67 | 76 | 56 | 69 | 44 | 75 | 50 | 40 | 75 | 33 | 50 | 29 | 67 | 68 | 68 | 50 |
| Miller | 75 | 29 | 44 | 75 | 78 | 100 | 17 | 44 | 60 | 50 | 55 | 29 | 54 | 64 | 63 | 67 | 33 | 38 |
| Walker | 100 | 38 | 50 | 75 | 78 | 100 | 17 | 50 | 60 | 100 | 61 | 29 | 58 | 64 | 67 | 70 | 38 | 43 |
| Nikishin | 13 | 38 | 0 | 58 | 44 | 44 | 40 | 67 | 43 | 11 | 50 | 29 | 8 | 23 | 50 | 54 | 50 | 50 |
