Game Recap
The New York Islanders squeezed past the New York Rangers 2-1 on January 29, 2026. Not much separated the two teams at 5-on-5 by xG: NYR 5.61, NYI 5.22. High-danger chances favored NYR by a wide margin: 12 to 7. Gabe Perreault generated the most offense at even strength with 2.04 ixG on 5 shots. Shots on goal were even at 21 apiece.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as New York Islanders vs New York Rangers progressed on Jan 29, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
NYI2 - 1NYR
Jan 29, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| NYR | P1 | 19 | 15 | 55.9 | 13 | 12 | 52.0 | 6 | 6 | 50.0 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 1.96 | 1.48 | 57.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 16 | 15 | 51.6 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 8 | 5 | 61.5 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1.43 | 1.98 | 41.9 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 14 | 17 | 45.2 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 7 | 10 | 41.2 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 8 | 3 | 72.7 | 2.73 | 2.35 | 53.7 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 49 | 47 | 51.0 | 31 | 36 | 46.3 | 21 | 21 | 50.0 | 40 | 33 | 54.8 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 6.12 | 5.81 | 51.3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| NYI | P1 | 15 | 19 | 44.1 | 12 | 13 | 48.0 | 6 | 6 | 50.0 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 1.48 | 1.96 | 43.0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 15 | 16 | 48.4 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 5 | 8 | 38.5 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1.98 | 1.43 | 58.1 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 17 | 14 | 54.8 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 10 | 7 | 58.8 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 3 | 8 | 27.3 | 2.35 | 2.73 | 46.3 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 47 | 49 | 49.0 | 36 | 31 | 53.7 | 21 | 21 | 50.0 | 33 | 40 | 45.2 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 5.81 | 6.12 | 48.7 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
Win Probability
NYR Favored
NYI Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
NYR
NYI
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
NYI Attempts
NYR Attempts
Individual Event Map
NYI ShootNYR Shoot
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NYR) performed against every skater on the away team (NYI) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = NYR players, Columns = NYI players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the NYR player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| NYR ↓ / NYI → | Horvat | Barzal | Pageau | Gatcomb | MacLean | Heineman | Palat | Duclair | Drouin | Lee | Holmstrom | Shabanov | Pelech | Schaefer | Pulock | DeAngelo | Mayfield | Soucy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zibanejad | 63 | 68 | 0 | 50 | 100 | 62 | 50 | 71 | 69 | 20 | 0 | 100 | 67 | 65 | 70 | 50 | 20 | 33 |
| Miller | 50 | 71 | 0 | 50 | 100 | 53 | 50 | 75 | 75 | 20 | 14 | 100 | 75 | 58 | 68 | 57 | 20 | 29 |
| Trocheck | 72 | 75 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 71 | 69 | 75 | 50 | 30 | 14 | 0 | 70 | 45 | 75 | 50 | 43 | 60 |
| Laba | 44 | 63 | 0 | 17 | 17 | 44 | 60 | 57 | 50 | 38 | 0 | 17 | 38 | 25 | 60 | 29 | 40 | 36 |
| Carrick | 100 | 20 | 67 | 53 | 53 | 100 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 60 | 82 | 22 | 25 | 70 | 20 | 40 |
| Rempe | — | 0 | 0 | 57 | 57 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 78 | 17 | 0 | 88 | 25 | 0 |
| Cuylle | 58 | 50 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 31 | 50 | 56 | 40 | 75 | 30 | 43 | 50 |
| Lafrenière | 75 | 100 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 75 | 100 | 50 | 20 | 43 | 50 | 75 | 56 | 88 | 44 | 50 | 67 |
| Othmann | 67 | 67 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 67 | 60 | 60 | 50 | 40 | 0 | 20 | 38 | 50 | 60 | 20 | 50 | 50 |
| Berard | — | 0 | 0 | 57 | 57 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 78 | 13 | 0 | 70 | 25 | 0 |
| Perreault | 55 | 67 | 0 | 50 | 100 | 55 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 72 | 70 | 33 | 33 | 33 |
| Raddysh | 60 | 50 | 0 | 17 | 17 | 60 | 60 | 43 | 33 | 40 | 0 | 17 | 38 | 33 | 60 | 14 | 38 | 40 |
| Gavrikov | 65 | 71 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 64 | 61 | 69 | 58 | 33 | 0 | 50 | 67 | 58 | 71 | 33 | 50 | 56 |
| Schneider | 55 | 91 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 53 | 56 | 90 | 78 | 60 | 33 | 50 | 33 | 70 | 73 | 20 | 63 | 56 |
| Vaakanainen | 67 | 71 | 25 | 47 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 71 | 0 | 50 | 53 | 85 | 56 | 60 | 67 | 0 | 22 |
| Robertson | 46 | 36 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 45 | 63 | 30 | 30 | 25 | 20 | 50 | 41 | 25 | 50 | 35 | 50 | 33 |
| Morrow | 100 | 60 | 25 | 44 | 47 | 100 | — | 75 | 75 | 0 | 50 | 53 | 82 | 44 | 50 | 80 | 13 | 30 |
| Borgen | 42 | 33 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 30 | 22 | 25 | 11 | 50 | 42 | 17 | 17 | 40 | 33 | 20 |
