Utah Mammoth vs Florida Panthers — January 27, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Utah Mammoth took down the Florida Panthers 4-3 on Tuesday. The underlying numbers told a different story — FLA actually held the xG edge (6.32 to 5.06) at 5-on-5, but it didn't matter on the scoreboard. Keep an eye on But — 1.83 individual xG on 3 shots at 5-on-5. FLA held a slight 8-5 edge in high-danger chances. Shots on goal: FLA 30, UTA 20.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Florida Panthers progressed on Jan 27, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA4 - 3FLA

Jan 27, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
FLA	P1	23	10	69.7	17	9	65.4	11	7	61.1	14	7	66.7	5	4	55.6	2.70	2.78	49.3	0	1	0.0
	P2	17	12	58.6	15	9	62.5	10	5	66.7	13	8	61.9	2	3	40.0	3.83	2.04	65.2	2	1	66.7
	P3	22	16	57.9	16	12	57.1	9	8	52.9	12	14	46.2	5	2	71.4	2.95	2.16	57.7	1	2	33.3
	Total	62	38	62.0	48	30	61.5	30	20	60.0	39	29	57.4	12	9	57.1	9.48	6.98	57.6	3	4	42.9
UTA	P1	10	23	30.3	9	17	34.6	7	11	38.9	7	14	33.3	4	5	44.4	2.78	2.70	50.7	1	0	100.0
	P2	12	17	41.4	9	15	37.5	5	10	33.3	8	13	38.1	3	2	60.0	2.04	3.83	34.8	1	2	33.3
	P3	16	22	42.1	12	16	42.9	8	9	47.1	14	12	53.8	2	5	28.6	2.16	2.95	42.3	2	1	66.7
	Total	38	62	38.0	30	48	38.5	20	30	40.0	29	39	42.6	9	12	42.9	6.98	9.48	42.4	4	3	57.1

Win Probability

FLA Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

FLA

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

FLA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootFLA Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Hit

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (FLA) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = FLA players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the FLA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

FLA ↓ / UTA →	Schmaltz	Stenlund	McBain	Hayton	O'Brien	Crouse	Carcone	But	Tanev	Peterka	Keller	Yamamoto	Sergachev	Cole	Marino	Schmidt	Durzi	DeSimone
Bennett	62	58	56	60	0	78	25	100	14	67	43	25	58	92	55	55	33	—
Reinhart	47	87	43	45	100	82	33	50	50	33	27	33	46	90	77	70	14	80
Verhaeghe	67	84	67	60	100	80	60	57	75	83	71	67	53	86	84	79	29	83
Rodrigues	62	75	57	55	—	80	60	50	33	63	63	33	36	85	82	75	25	80
Luostarinen	63	86	43	0	80	77	50	67	83	20	63	50	55	63	70	57	83	67
Lundell	64	67	63	50	100	80	50	100	100	50	73	33	60	75	64	60	88	100
Tkachuk	67	53	56	100	13	79	25	100	22	100	40	25	53	100	55	58	33	—
Marchand	58	75	47	33	33	82	43	67	33	17	50	33	67	78	62	55	70	50
Greer	100	50	—	60	50	100	—	60	20	75	100	—	67	60	40	50	88	78
Vilmanis	100	75	50	100	75	100	50	100	50	100	100	50	100	100	50	50	100	100
Samoskevich	20	44	25	100	0	63	50	100	20	100	0	50	31	100	55	44	11	—
Schwindt	83	67	50	100	67	83	50	100	50	100	80	50	67	75	67	60	88	88
Balinskis	77	86	50	57	100	86	33	60	—	67	82	43	80	87	45	45	79	86
Forsling	48	65	47	50	43	75	67	100	64	20	37	50	35	92	71	63	63	100
Mikkola	77	100	44	67	100	75	38	60	100	71	77	44	60	50	56	56	73	75
Ekblad	38	64	30	50	50	69	67	100	57	20	37	0	37	90	64	50	63	100
Bjornfot	33	43	25	50	33	33	25	50	23	86	33	50	8	70	83	67	15	63
Petry	67	36	0	57	36	50	0	50	10	88	67	0	17	71	100	100	9	71