Game Recap
The Edmonton Oilers defeated the Anaheim Ducks 7-4 on January 26, 2026. Despite the result, the Anaheim Ducks held the edge in expected goals (9.98 to 6.61) at 5-on-5, indicating the Edmonton Oilers received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Edmonton Oilers created 10 high-danger scoring chances compared to 8 from the Anaheim Ducks at 5-on-5. Mikael Granlund recorded a hat trick with 3 goals. Mattias Ekholm recorded a hat trick with 3 goals. Beckett Sennecke was the most dangerous skater with 2.03 individual expected goals on 5 shots at 5-on-5. The Anaheim Ducks outshot the Edmonton Oilers 41-32 in total shots on goal.
- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Anaheim Ducks vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Jan 26, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| EDM | P1 | 24 | 24 | 50.0 | 17 | 19 | 47.2 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 18 | 21 | 46.2 | 5 | 5 | 50.0 | 4.13 | 5.13 | 44.6 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 25 | 21 | 54.3 | 20 | 19 | 51.3 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 19 | 11 | 63.3 | 7 | 3 | 70.0 | 4.93 | 3.64 | 57.6 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | |
| P3 | 9 | 26 | 25.7 | 5 | 22 | 18.5 | 5 | 16 | 23.8 | 7 | 14 | 33.3 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1.65 | 4.78 | 25.7 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| Total | 58 | 71 | 45.0 | 42 | 60 | 41.2 | 32 | 41 | 43.8 | 44 | 46 | 48.9 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 10.71 | 13.55 | 44.2 | 7 | 4 | 63.6 | |
| ANA | P1 | 24 | 24 | 50.0 | 19 | 17 | 52.8 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 21 | 18 | 53.8 | 5 | 5 | 50.0 | 5.13 | 4.13 | 55.4 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 25 | 45.7 | 19 | 20 | 48.7 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 11 | 19 | 36.7 | 3 | 7 | 30.0 | 3.64 | 4.93 | 42.4 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | |
| P3 | 26 | 9 | 74.3 | 22 | 5 | 81.5 | 16 | 5 | 76.2 | 14 | 7 | 66.7 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 4.78 | 1.65 | 74.3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| Total | 71 | 58 | 55.0 | 60 | 42 | 58.8 | 41 | 32 | 56.2 | 46 | 44 | 51.1 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 13.55 | 10.71 | 55.8 | 4 | 7 | 36.4 | |
Win Probability
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
Shot Density Heatmap
Individual Event Map
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (ANA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = EDM players, Columns = ANA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| EDM ↓ / ANA → | Granlund | Poehling | Harkins | Washe | Strome | Killorn | Gauthier | Kreider | Viel | Johnston | Sennecke | LaCombe | Trouba | Mintyukov | Helleson | Moore | Gudas | Zellweger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDavid | 31 | 50 | 42 | 69 | 75 | 32 | 35 | 53 | 33 | 57 | 32 | 39 | 39 | 65 | 57 | 47 | 29 | 14 |
| Draisaitl | 47 | 59 | 25 | 75 | 60 | 47 | 45 | 33 | 57 | 70 | 43 | 56 | 58 | 75 | 82 | 69 | 36 | 20 |
| Nugent-Hopkins | 37 | 50 | 40 | 71 | 50 | 40 | 38 | 55 | 31 | 50 | 36 | 31 | 34 | 67 | 56 | 33 | 54 | 42 |
| Janmark | 21 | 50 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 31 | 20 | 40 | 33 | 26 | 27 | 41 | 38 | 40 | 22 | 100 | 100 |
| Lazar | 21 | 100 | 60 | 0 | 33 | 40 | 58 | 22 | 100 | 80 | 33 | 53 | 63 | 56 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 50 |
| Roslovic | 67 | 73 | 50 | 50 | — | 89 | 40 | 0 | 67 | 45 | 71 | 47 | 56 | 88 | 100 | 45 | 67 | 67 |
| Savoie | 50 | 50 | 67 | 57 | — | 60 | 44 | 33 | 75 | 50 | 55 | 42 | 36 | 83 | 100 | 53 | 60 | 60 |
| Frederic | 33 | 100 | 67 | 50 | 0 | 42 | 67 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 43 | 50 | 50 | 55 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 100 |
| Samanski | 100 | 67 | 75 | 55 | — | 100 | 75 | 67 | 100 | 45 | 100 | 58 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 60 | 60 |
| Hyman | 31 | 53 | 42 | 64 | 100 | 33 | 33 | 54 | 35 | 50 | 30 | 37 | 42 | 65 | 57 | 44 | 31 | 17 |
| Podkolzin | 54 | 70 | 40 | 67 | 33 | 65 | 88 | 29 | 54 | 83 | 50 | 53 | 60 | 73 | 71 | 38 | 75 | 71 |
| Kapanen | 60 | 76 | 40 | 80 | 33 | 71 | 67 | 25 | 60 | 88 | 64 | 60 | 61 | 83 | 88 | 80 | 75 | 63 |
| Bouchard | 39 | 41 | 42 | 53 | 0 | 48 | 33 | 41 | 28 | 42 | 43 | 33 | 36 | 68 | 75 | 40 | 33 | 31 |
| Walman | 35 | 73 | 50 | 80 | 80 | 48 | 55 | 38 | 69 | 73 | 37 | 54 | 57 | 61 | 56 | 57 | 78 | 57 |
| Ekholm | 33 | 53 | 43 | 45 | 0 | 50 | 39 | 44 | 25 | 42 | 41 | 33 | 35 | 67 | 67 | 38 | 36 | 33 |
| Nurse | 41 | 60 | 33 | 78 | 75 | 37 | 60 | 36 | 61 | 77 | 42 | 53 | 52 | 60 | 69 | 53 | 67 | 50 |
| Emberson | 25 | 100 | 57 | 40 | 0 | 40 | 55 | 30 | 100 | 67 | 31 | 47 | 57 | 56 | 50 | 60 | 33 | 33 |
| Stastney | 27 | 75 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 44 | 38 | 31 | 67 | 50 | 38 | 41 | 50 | 75 | 71 | 57 | 50 | 33 |
