Utah Mammoth vs Tampa Bay Lightning — January 26, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Tampa Bay Lightning shut out the Utah Mammoth 2-0 on January 26, 2026. Despite the result, the Utah Mammoth held the edge in expected goals (9.69 to 6.42) at 5-on-5, indicating the Tampa Bay Lightning received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Utah Mammoth created 14 high-danger scoring chances compared to 6 from the Tampa Bay Lightning at 5-on-5. Michael Carcone was the most dangerous skater with 2.27 individual expected goals on 4 shots at 5-on-5. The Tampa Bay Lightning outshot the Utah Mammoth 29-28 in total shots on goal.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Tampa Bay Lightning progressed on Jan 26, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA0 - 2TBL

Jan 26, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
TBL	P1	17	27	38.6	14	19	42.4	11	12	47.8	11	20	35.5	3	6	33.3	2.61	5.29	33.0	0	0	—
	P2	13	23	36.1	12	14	46.2	6	8	42.9	11	17	39.3	1	9	10.0	2.65	4.91	35.0	1	0	100.0
	P3	23	15	60.5	18	11	62.1	12	8	60.0	17	9	65.4	7	3	70.0	4.93	2.18	69.3	1	0	100.0
	Total	53	65	44.9	44	44	50.0	29	28	50.9	39	46	45.9	11	18	37.9	10.18	12.38	45.1	2	0	100.0
UTA	P1	27	17	61.4	19	14	57.6	12	11	52.2	20	11	64.5	6	3	66.7	5.29	2.61	67.0	0	0	—
	P2	23	13	63.9	14	12	53.8	8	6	57.1	17	11	60.7	9	1	90.0	4.91	2.65	65.0	0	1	0.0
	P3	15	23	39.5	11	18	37.9	8	12	40.0	9	17	34.6	3	7	30.0	2.18	4.93	30.7	0	1	0.0
	Total	65	53	55.1	44	44	50.0	28	29	49.1	46	39	54.1	18	11	62.1	12.38	10.18	54.9	0	2	0.0

Win Probability

TBL Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

TBL

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

TBL Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootTBL Shoot

Save

Missed Shot Against

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (TBL) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = TBL players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the TBL player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

TBL ↓ / UTA →	Schmaltz	McBain	Hayton	Stenlund	Carcone	Crouse	But	Tanev	Guenther	Keller	Peterka	Yamamoto	Sergachev	Schmidt	Durzi	Marino	Cole	DeSimone
Cirelli	33	63	21	82	50	70	33	0	37	33	36	0	33	65	60	50	67	50
Guentzel	69	67	17	92	29	100	17	50	47	50	18	100	47	90	38	92	40	44
Gourde	52	50	50	100	33	50	0	100	44	52	25	67	50	67	40	75	67	100
Girgensons	54	100	50	100	29	45	0	—	50	50	17	0	44	67	31	83	67	100
James	0	40	21	100	33	100	15	50	43	0	21	100	14	100	0	67	47	25
Goncalves	0	33	17	100	29	100	17	50	29	50	17	100	17	86	0	60	44	25
Finley	—	0	—	33	0	—	—	43	0	—	—	43	—	43	—	38	0	0
Hagel	86	70	36	78	46	43	27	0	63	67	36	0	62	63	50	72	53	50
Paul	0	0	0	50	0	100	—	50	0	0	—	50	20	56	100	38	29	0
Kucherov	100	70	36	78	60	100	29	0	65	100	40	0	60	67	58	72	62	67
Bjorkstrand	90	40	100	50	0	100	—	50	54	50	0	50	89	64	100	67	38	0
Holmberg	54	50	100	100	67	56	—	—	57	52	100	0	54	67	45	71	40	50
Raddysh	66	53	38	77	0	62	40	67	45	57	60	75	60	82	46	87	33	42
Moser	38	17	24	80	0	69	50	67	18	41	67	75	36	75	41	56	46	29
Cernak	27	57	0	33	42	43	0	20	25	13	0	20	0	60	13	50	17	20
Carlile	25	46	60	50	33	13	30	50	43	25	30	50	25	44	36	50	50	29
Crozier	43	42	29	67	38	25	31	67	41	43	33	67	36	42	45	50	43	25
Groshev	67	50	7	0	67	100	0	0	50	—	7	0	14	75	0	60	18	8