Pittsburgh Penguins vs Edmonton Oilers — January 22, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

A lopsided 6-2 result saw the Pittsburgh Penguins blow by the Edmonton Oilers on Thursday. A close game in the analytics too — EDM and PIT were nearly dead even in expected goals at 5-on-5 (7.42 vs 8.15). Mantha put up 2 goals. Shots on goal: EDM 32, PIT 23.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Pittsburgh Penguins vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Jan 22, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

PIT6 - 2EDM

Jan 22, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
EDM	P1	19	18	51.4	16	15	51.6	12	9	57.1	13	16	44.8	4	6	40.0	3.39	4.40	43.5	0	3	0.0
	P2	20	18	52.6	13	15	46.4	10	10	50.0	16	12	57.1	3	3	50.0	2.42	3.92	38.2	1	2	33.3
	P3	18	14	56.3	16	10	61.5	10	4	71.4	9	10	47.4	2	3	40.0	2.29	1.94	54.1	1	1	50.0
	Total	57	50	53.3	45	40	52.9	32	23	58.2	38	38	50.0	9	12	42.9	8.10	10.26	44.1	2	6	25.0
PIT	P1	18	19	48.6	15	16	48.4	9	12	42.9	16	13	55.2	6	4	60.0	4.40	3.39	56.5	3	0	100.0
	P2	18	20	47.4	15	13	53.6	10	10	50.0	12	16	42.9	3	3	50.0	3.92	2.42	61.8	2	1	66.7
	P3	14	18	43.8	10	16	38.5	4	10	28.6	10	9	52.6	3	2	60.0	1.94	2.29	45.9	1	1	50.0
	Total	50	57	46.7	40	45	47.1	23	32	41.8	38	38	50.0	12	9	57.1	10.26	8.10	55.9	6	2	75.0

Win Probability

EDM Favored

PIT Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

EDM

PIT

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

PIT Attempts

EDM Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

PIT ShootEDM Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Hit

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (PIT) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = EDM players, Columns = PIT players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

EDM ↓ / PIT →	Crosby	Malkin	Dewar	Acciari	Lizotte	Kindel	Novak	Rust	Rakell	Mantha	Brazeau	Chinakhov	Shea	Kulak	Karlsson	St. Ivany	Clifton	Wotherspoon
McDavid	60	35	69	67	50	57	53	76	69	60	60	45	73	71	43	80	60	42
Nugent-Hopkins	53	27	71	69	60	63	40	65	57	67	67	38	75	67	36	79	63	33
Draisaitl	50	50	67	67	54	43	75	70	60	50	50	75	67	77	38	76	54	38
Roslovic	31	42	33	43	43	40	56	33	31	60	50	56	38	40	40	50	30	44
Savoie	43	50	29	38	38	57	57	50	43	63	57	63	43	60	50	50	33	36
Janmark	29	25	100	100	100	33	33	31	29	33	33	50	50	14	29	50	29	33
Frederic	36	25	33	33	33	33	33	36	36	33	33	33	38	25	25	46	17	25
Lazar	14	17	100	100	100	0	33	14	14	0	0	33	20	33	17	25	33	25
Hyman	73	43	69	67	50	57	53	86	89	60	60	45	73	73	50	80	58	45
Howard	40	44	38	44	44	50	57	50	40	57	50	57	43	60	50	50	33	40
Mangiapane	—	0	86	86	86	43	0	—	—	43	43	0	75	40	0	75	50	33
Podkolzin	43	43	56	56	56	50	67	43	43	57	57	100	54	67	25	60	63	40
Bouchard	50	35	73	70	50	57	53	59	53	60	60	46	64	76	37	76	59	38
Nurse	31	30	55	55	55	71	50	42	36	83	83	60	50	33	45	60	43	58
Ekholm	50	28	80	75	60	67	38	56	54	60	60	36	73	64	35	83	47	30
Walman	14	36	55	58	58	50	50	20	14	60	56	63	40	50	29	48	60	44
Emberson	50	38	45	45	45	40	50	50	50	40	40	50	43	55	40	43	50	42
Stastney	0	43	50	55	55	25	60	0	0	33	25	75	47	67	0	50	25	0