Pittsburgh Penguins vs Calgary Flames — January 21, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Pittsburgh Penguins defeated the Calgary Flames 4-1 on January 21, 2026. The Pittsburgh Penguins controlled play with 48.1% Corsi and generated 8.65 expected goals compared to 5.80 from the Calgary Flames at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Pittsburgh Penguins created 7 high-danger scoring chances compared to 6 from the Calgary Flames at 5-on-5. Egor Chinakhov was the most dangerous skater with 1.16 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Pittsburgh Penguins outshot the Calgary Flames 25-19 in total shots on goal.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Pittsburgh Penguins vs Calgary Flames progressed on Jan 21, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

PIT4 - 1CGY

Jan 21, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
CGY	P1	21	21	50.0	15	16	48.4	5	11	31.3	12	14	46.2	2	2	50.0	2.00	3.00	40.0	0	1	0.0
	P2	25	20	55.6	17	15	53.1	9	8	52.9	15	16	48.4	2	3	40.0	2.83	3.10	47.7	1	1	50.0
	P3	13	13	50.0	8	11	42.1	5	6	45.5	6	10	37.5	3	3	50.0	1.83	3.20	36.4	0	2	0.0
	Total	59	54	52.2	40	42	48.8	19	25	43.2	33	40	45.2	7	8	46.7	6.65	9.29	41.7	1	4	20.0
PIT	P1	21	21	50.0	16	15	51.6	11	5	68.8	14	12	53.8	2	2	50.0	3.00	2.00	60.0	1	0	100.0
	P2	20	25	44.4	15	17	46.9	8	9	47.1	16	15	51.6	3	2	60.0	3.10	2.83	52.3	1	1	50.0
	P3	13	13	50.0	11	8	57.9	6	5	54.5	10	6	62.5	3	3	50.0	3.20	1.83	63.6	2	0	100.0
	Total	54	59	47.8	42	40	51.2	25	19	56.8	40	33	54.8	8	7	53.3	9.29	6.65	58.3	4	1	80.0

Win Probability

CGY Favored

PIT Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

CGY

PIT

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

PIT Attempts

CGY Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

PIT ShootCGY Shoot

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Takeaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CGY) performed against every skater on the away team (PIT) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = CGY players, Columns = PIT players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the CGY player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

CGY ↓ / PIT →	Malkin	Crosby	Novak	Dewar	Lizotte	Acciari	Kindel	Rakell	Rust	Chinakhov	Mantha	Brazeau	Shea	St. Ivany	Wotherspoon	Kulak	Clifton	Graves
Kadri	38	33	38	47	40	47	33	33	33	38	31	33	44	42	15	20	50	47
Sharangovich	43	48	67	50	50	44	67	48	57	33	75	67	25	36	67	56	86	88
Zary	39	0	39	36	42	36	71	0	33	39	63	71	35	39	0	0	71	67
Backlund	67	53	75	50	50	40	100	53	57	50	100	100	25	33	75	67	100	100
Frost	67	60	67	50	57	50	43	60	67	67	43	43	17	33	78	67	54	57
Pospisil	64	67	64	100	100	100	22	67	67	64	22	22	29	33	67	86	45	45
Kirkland	50	67	75	60	60	60	0	67	100	50	0	0	50	67	83	86	0	0
Farabee	50	50	50	100	100	100	36	50	50	50	33	36	40	46	63	80	43	43
Lomberg	67	100	67	50	50	50	0	100	100	67	0	0	67	60	64	64	0	0
Coronato	50	57	57	58	44	55	100	57	59	40	100	100	35	41	75	65	83	86
Klapka	67	100	67	42	42	42	0	100	100	67	0	0	55	63	54	58	0	0
Gridin	45	0	45	55	44	55	67	0	0	45	67	67	47	47	0	0	80	80
Bahl	44	60	50	62	58	58	50	58	65	44	50	50	29	29	70	67	68	70
Weegar	41	0	48	29	17	29	20	13	17	41	17	20	30	40	47	45	0	0
Whitecloud	36	68	42	62	58	58	63	68	69	36	63	63	33	31	70	67	72	74
Kuznetsov	38	29	41	17	17	17	25	38	38	38	20	25	29	36	40	36	0	0
Brzustewicz	83	—	83	71	75	71	25	—	100	80	31	25	67	67	50	50	50	50
Hanley	83	—	83	71	71	71	27	—	—	80	33	27	67	67	60	60	46	46