Game Recap
The Los Angeles Kings came away with a 4-3 victory over the New York Rangers on January 20, 2026. LAK had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 10.02 xG against 6.61 while holding 59.0% of shot attempts. LAK generated 17 high-danger looks compared to just 10 from NYR. Miller put up 2 goals. Shots on goal: LAK 27, NYR 36.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as New York Rangers vs Los Angeles Kings progressed on Jan 20, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
NYR3 - 4LAK
Jan 20, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| LAK | P1 | 23 | 15 | 60.5 | 18 | 12 | 60.0 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 18 | 9 | 66.7 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | 4.36 | 2.51 | 63.5 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 27 | 21 | 56.3 | 16 | 18 | 47.1 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 20 | 15 | 57.1 | 6 | 6 | 50.0 | 3.08 | 4.57 | 40.3 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 21 | 28 | 42.9 | 14 | 19 | 42.4 | 8 | 12 | 40.0 | 11 | 19 | 36.7 | 5 | 11 | 31.3 | 3.03 | 4.95 | 38.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 71 | 64 | 52.6 | 48 | 49 | 49.5 | 27 | 36 | 42.9 | 49 | 43 | 53.3 | 17 | 20 | 45.9 | 10.47 | 12.02 | 46.6 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | |
| NYR | P1 | 15 | 23 | 39.5 | 12 | 18 | 40.0 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 9 | 18 | 33.3 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 2.51 | 4.36 | 36.5 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 27 | 43.8 | 18 | 16 | 52.9 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 15 | 20 | 42.9 | 6 | 6 | 50.0 | 4.57 | 3.08 | 59.7 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 28 | 21 | 57.1 | 19 | 14 | 57.6 | 12 | 8 | 60.0 | 19 | 11 | 63.3 | 11 | 5 | 68.8 | 4.95 | 3.03 | 62.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 64 | 71 | 47.4 | 49 | 48 | 50.5 | 36 | 27 | 57.1 | 43 | 49 | 46.7 | 20 | 17 | 54.1 | 12.02 | 10.47 | 53.4 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | |
Win Probability
LAK Favored
NYR Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
LAK
NYR
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
NYR Attempts
LAK Attempts
Individual Event Map
NYR ShootLAK Shoot
Goal
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (LAK) performed against every skater on the away team (NYR) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = LAK players, Columns = NYR players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the LAK player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| LAK ↓ / NYR → | Zibanejad | Miller | Trocheck | Laba | Carrick | Brodzinski | Panarin | Lafrenière | Cuylle | Othmann | Perreault | Raddysh | Gavrikov | Schneider | Borgen | Soucy | Robertson | Morrow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turcotte | 75 | 75 | 14 | 100 | 70 | 75 | 14 | 14 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 82 | 100 | 100 | 36 | 36 | 79 | 70 |
| Helenius | 100 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 63 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 63 | 67 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 44 |
| Fiala | 83 | 83 | 44 | 88 | 64 | 75 | 17 | 14 | 88 | 83 | 75 | 71 | 100 | 88 | 56 | 50 | 69 | 70 |
| Foegele | 58 | 55 | 39 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 42 | 42 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 47 | 64 | 50 | 50 | 83 | 63 |
| Kuzmenko | 83 | 83 | 57 | 88 | 64 | 75 | 25 | 20 | 88 | 83 | 75 | 71 | 100 | 88 | 64 | 58 | 69 | 70 |
| Malott | 100 | 100 | 100 | 63 | 71 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 63 | 100 | 71 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 38 |
| Armia | 35 | 28 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 29 | 36 | 18 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 53 | 67 | 37 | 37 | 80 | 57 |
| Laferriere | 48 | 43 | 28 | 58 | 100 | — | 37 | 33 | 22 | 50 | 65 | 100 | 55 | 65 | 67 | 71 | 55 | 33 |
| Kempe | 54 | 50 | 44 | 43 | 100 | — | 40 | 36 | 56 | 56 | 61 | 100 | 48 | 53 | 85 | 89 | 38 | 25 |
| Perry | 53 | 48 | 42 | 20 | 100 | — | 41 | 33 | 56 | 43 | 59 | 100 | 44 | 50 | 85 | 89 | 38 | 25 |
| Byfield | 50 | 45 | 32 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 34 | 37 | 50 | 100 | 71 | 100 | 54 | 70 | 37 | 37 | 80 | 57 |
| Ward | 100 | 100 | 100 | 70 | 71 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 82 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 70 | 38 |
| Ceci | 33 | 29 | 24 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 32 | 0 | 100 | 64 | 50 | 43 | 47 | 33 | 35 | 50 | 36 |
| Edmundson | 61 | 57 | 38 | 89 | 75 | 100 | 47 | 41 | 83 | 86 | 75 | 86 | 58 | 75 | 83 | 75 | 78 | 78 |
| Clarke | 88 | 81 | 71 | 88 | 57 | 67 | 80 | 67 | 89 | 83 | 81 | 70 | 91 | 86 | 75 | 67 | 89 | 78 |
| Anderson | 25 | 22 | 18 | 100 | 33 | 100 | 21 | 28 | 0 | 100 | 54 | 71 | 57 | 55 | 26 | 24 | 62 | 31 |
| Dumoulin | 67 | 67 | 80 | 58 | 75 | 77 | 80 | 67 | 43 | 53 | 83 | 80 | 88 | 88 | 71 | 71 | 58 | 50 |
| Moverare | 80 | 67 | 100 | 38 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 43 | 47 | 75 | 100 | 89 | 89 | 91 | 92 | 36 | 42 |
