Game Recap
The Los Angeles Kings defeated the New York Rangers 4-3 on January 20, 2026. The Los Angeles Kings controlled play with 59.0% Corsi and generated 10.02 expected goals compared to 6.61 from the New York Rangers at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Los Angeles Kings created 17 high-danger scoring chances compared to 10 from the New York Rangers at 5-on-5. J.T. Miller scored 2 goals. Alex Turcotte was the most dangerous skater with 2.34 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The New York Rangers outshot the Los Angeles Kings 36-27 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as New York Rangers vs Los Angeles Kings progressed on Jan 20, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
NYR3 - 4LAK
Jan 20, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| LAK | P1 | 23 | 15 | 60.5 | 18 | 12 | 60.0 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 18 | 9 | 66.7 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | 4.36 | 2.51 | 63.5 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 27 | 21 | 56.3 | 16 | 18 | 47.1 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 20 | 15 | 57.1 | 6 | 6 | 50.0 | 3.08 | 4.57 | 40.3 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 21 | 28 | 42.9 | 14 | 19 | 42.4 | 8 | 12 | 40.0 | 11 | 19 | 36.7 | 5 | 11 | 31.3 | 3.03 | 4.95 | 38.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 71 | 64 | 52.6 | 48 | 49 | 49.5 | 27 | 36 | 42.9 | 49 | 43 | 53.3 | 17 | 20 | 45.9 | 10.47 | 12.02 | 46.6 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | |
| NYR | P1 | 15 | 23 | 39.5 | 12 | 18 | 40.0 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 9 | 18 | 33.3 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 2.51 | 4.36 | 36.5 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 27 | 43.8 | 18 | 16 | 52.9 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 15 | 20 | 42.9 | 6 | 6 | 50.0 | 4.57 | 3.08 | 59.7 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 28 | 21 | 57.1 | 19 | 14 | 57.6 | 12 | 8 | 60.0 | 19 | 11 | 63.3 | 11 | 5 | 68.8 | 4.95 | 3.03 | 62.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 64 | 71 | 47.4 | 49 | 48 | 50.5 | 36 | 27 | 57.1 | 43 | 49 | 46.7 | 20 | 17 | 54.1 | 12.02 | 10.47 | 53.4 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | |
Win Probability
LAK Favored
NYR Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
LAK
NYR
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
NYR Attempts
LAK Attempts
Individual Event Map
NYR ShootLAK Shoot
Goal
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (LAK) performed against every skater on the away team (NYR) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = LAK players, Columns = NYR players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the LAK player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| LAK ↓ / NYR → | Zibanejad | Miller | Trocheck | Laba | Carrick | Brodzinski | Panarin | Lafrenière | Cuylle | Othmann | Perreault | Raddysh | Gavrikov | Schneider | Borgen | Soucy | Robertson | Morrow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turcotte | 75 | 75 | 14 | 100 | 70 | 75 | 14 | 14 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 82 | 100 | 100 | 36 | 36 | 79 | 70 |
| Helenius | 100 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 63 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 63 | 67 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 44 |
| Fiala | 83 | 83 | 44 | 88 | 64 | 75 | 17 | 14 | 88 | 83 | 75 | 71 | 100 | 88 | 56 | 50 | 69 | 70 |
| Foegele | 58 | 55 | 39 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 42 | 42 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 47 | 64 | 50 | 50 | 83 | 63 |
| Kuzmenko | 83 | 83 | 57 | 88 | 64 | 75 | 25 | 20 | 88 | 83 | 75 | 71 | 100 | 88 | 64 | 58 | 69 | 70 |
| Malott | 100 | 100 | 100 | 63 | 71 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 63 | 100 | 71 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 38 |
| Armia | 35 | 28 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 29 | 36 | 18 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 53 | 67 | 37 | 37 | 80 | 57 |
| Laferriere | 48 | 43 | 28 | 58 | 100 | — | 37 | 33 | 22 | 50 | 65 | 100 | 55 | 65 | 67 | 71 | 55 | 33 |
| Kempe | 54 | 50 | 44 | 43 | 100 | — | 40 | 36 | 56 | 56 | 61 | 100 | 48 | 53 | 85 | 89 | 38 | 25 |
| Perry | 53 | 48 | 42 | 20 | 100 | — | 41 | 33 | 56 | 43 | 59 | 100 | 44 | 50 | 85 | 89 | 38 | 25 |
| Byfield | 50 | 45 | 32 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 34 | 37 | 50 | 100 | 71 | 100 | 54 | 70 | 37 | 37 | 80 | 57 |
| Ward | 100 | 100 | 100 | 70 | 71 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 82 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 70 | 38 |
| Ceci | 33 | 29 | 24 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 32 | 0 | 100 | 64 | 50 | 43 | 47 | 33 | 35 | 50 | 36 |
| Edmundson | 61 | 57 | 38 | 89 | 75 | 100 | 47 | 41 | 83 | 86 | 75 | 86 | 58 | 75 | 83 | 75 | 78 | 78 |
| Clarke | 88 | 81 | 71 | 88 | 57 | 67 | 80 | 67 | 89 | 83 | 81 | 70 | 91 | 86 | 75 | 67 | 89 | 78 |
| Anderson | 25 | 22 | 18 | 100 | 33 | 100 | 21 | 28 | 0 | 100 | 54 | 71 | 57 | 55 | 26 | 24 | 62 | 31 |
| Dumoulin | 67 | 67 | 80 | 58 | 75 | 77 | 80 | 67 | 43 | 53 | 83 | 80 | 88 | 88 | 71 | 71 | 58 | 50 |
| Moverare | 80 | 67 | 100 | 38 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 43 | 47 | 75 | 100 | 89 | 89 | 91 | 92 | 36 | 42 |
