Game Recap
The Tampa Bay Lightning defeated the San Jose Sharks 4-1 on January 20, 2026. The Tampa Bay Lightning controlled play with 60.4% Corsi and generated 8.69 expected goals compared to 2.91 from the San Jose Sharks at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Tampa Bay Lightning created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 6 from the San Jose Sharks at 5-on-5. Brandon Hagel scored 2 goals. The San Jose Sharks outshot the Tampa Bay Lightning 23-20 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as San Jose Sharks vs Tampa Bay Lightning progressed on Jan 20, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
SJS1 - 4TBL
Jan 20, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| TBL | P1 | 19 | 19 | 50.0 | 12 | 10 | 54.5 | 6 | 9 | 40.0 | 14 | 13 | 51.9 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 2.06 | 1.41 | 59.3 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 10 | 67.7 | 16 | 7 | 69.6 | 7 | 5 | 58.3 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 3.65 | 1.04 | 77.9 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 25 | 15 | 62.5 | 16 | 10 | 61.5 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 14 | 8 | 63.6 | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | 3.44 | 0.75 | 82.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 65 | 44 | 59.6 | 44 | 27 | 62.0 | 20 | 23 | 46.5 | 41 | 29 | 58.6 | 13 | 6 | 68.4 | 9.15 | 3.21 | 74.1 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | |
| SJS | P1 | 19 | 19 | 50.0 | 10 | 12 | 45.5 | 9 | 6 | 60.0 | 13 | 14 | 48.1 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 1.41 | 2.06 | 40.7 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 10 | 21 | 32.3 | 7 | 16 | 30.4 | 5 | 7 | 41.7 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 1.04 | 3.65 | 22.1 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 15 | 25 | 37.5 | 10 | 16 | 38.5 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 8 | 14 | 36.4 | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | 0.75 | 3.44 | 18.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 44 | 65 | 40.4 | 27 | 44 | 38.0 | 23 | 20 | 53.5 | 29 | 41 | 41.4 | 6 | 13 | 31.6 | 3.21 | 9.15 | 25.9 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | |
Win Probability
TBL Favored
SJS Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
TBL
SJS
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
SJS Attempts
TBL Attempts
Individual Event Map
SJS ShootTBL Shoot
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (TBL) performed against every skater on the away team (SJS) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = TBL players, Columns = SJS players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the TBL player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| TBL ↓ / SJS → | Celebrini | Wennberg | Smith | Toffoli | Misa | Ostapchuk | Goodrow | Eklund | Regenda | Graf | Reaves | Gaudette | Klingberg | Ferraro | Orlov | Liljegren | Dickinson | Desharnais |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Girgensons | 56 | 33 | 52 | 50 | 55 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 100 | 74 | 50 | 100 | 65 | 57 | 65 | 80 | 33 | 25 |
| Gourde | 58 | 50 | 54 | 56 | 55 | — | — | 50 | 100 | 75 | — | 100 | 65 | 60 | 65 | 100 | 40 | 40 |
| Goncalves | 75 | 60 | 50 | 62 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 67 | 80 | 50 | 73 | 17 | 53 | 25 | 53 | 91 | 92 |
| Guentzel | 100 | 65 | 67 | 64 | 56 | 50 | 100 | 59 | 64 | 86 | 67 | 73 | 40 | 56 | 29 | 57 | 92 | 93 |
| James | 100 | 60 | 60 | 62 | 80 | 0 | — | 56 | 83 | 80 | 50 | 91 | 50 | 53 | 40 | 57 | 92 | 93 |
| Cirelli | 40 | 75 | 40 | 50 | 71 | 67 | 60 | 50 | 75 | 60 | 80 | 71 | 29 | 80 | 33 | 82 | 75 | 67 |
| Finley | 100 | 75 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 50 | 56 | 67 | 100 | — | 56 | 100 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 75 |
| Hagel | 38 | 60 | 38 | 60 | 63 | 75 | 86 | 57 | 80 | 75 | 88 | 71 | 54 | 65 | 55 | 73 | 67 | 75 |
| Paul | 0 | 50 | 0 | 60 | 57 | 54 | 60 | 33 | 75 | 100 | 67 | 67 | 33 | 50 | 46 | 50 | 75 | 100 |
| Holmberg | 61 | 71 | 58 | 60 | 55 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 76 | 100 | 100 | 69 | 60 | 65 | 100 | 50 | 63 |
| Kucherov | 38 | 67 | 38 | 57 | 63 | 79 | 89 | 63 | 80 | 71 | 90 | 71 | 63 | 68 | 55 | 75 | 67 | 71 |
| Bjorkstrand | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 64 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 64 | 100 | 60 | 71 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 100 |
| Moser | 47 | 60 | 44 | 69 | 43 | 89 | 89 | 59 | 100 | 61 | 89 | 100 | 54 | 67 | 55 | 80 | 33 | 33 |
| Raddysh | 55 | 77 | 52 | 69 | 57 | 88 | 88 | 71 | 100 | 68 | 88 | 100 | 58 | 68 | 53 | 81 | 57 | 83 |
| Crozier | 33 | 70 | 0 | 63 | 57 | 44 | 50 | 67 | 68 | 86 | 50 | 71 | 50 | 57 | 47 | 57 | 72 | 79 |
| Cernak | 58 | 31 | 54 | 38 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 100 | 86 | 67 | 100 | 55 | 40 | 71 | 40 | 67 | 67 |
| D'Astous | 86 | 46 | 75 | 45 | 60 | 40 | 50 | 38 | 67 | 100 | 60 | 67 | 50 | 42 | 50 | 46 | 75 | 80 |
| Carlile | 100 | 71 | 0 | 60 | 82 | 44 | 40 | 67 | 79 | 88 | 50 | 80 | 64 | 50 | 53 | 50 | 82 | 92 |
