Game Recap
The Calgary Flames pushed the New Jersey Devils to the limit before falling 2-1 in overtime on January 19, 2026. Keep an eye on Hughes — 1.64 individual xG on 5 shots at 5-on-5. At 5-on-5, NJD carried the play with 5.57 expected goals and a 53.7% share of shot attempts. NJD outshot CGY 32-22.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as New Jersey Devils vs Calgary Flames progressed on Jan 19, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
NJD2 - 1CGY (OT)
Jan 19, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| CGY | P1 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 6 | 10 | 37.5 | 3 | 7 | 30.0 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 0.83 | 2.74 | 23.3 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 19 | 22 | 46.3 | 13 | 18 | 41.9 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 12 | 13 | 48.0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 1.06 | 3.51 | 23.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 15 | 18 | 45.5 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 3.23 | 0.80 | 80.2 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| OT | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 46 | 54 | 46.0 | 33 | 40 | 45.2 | 22 | 32 | 40.7 | 31 | 36 | 46.3 | 7 | 10 | 41.2 | 5.13 | 7.88 | 39.4 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| NJD | P1 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 10 | 6 | 62.5 | 7 | 3 | 70.0 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 2.74 | 0.83 | 76.7 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 22 | 19 | 53.7 | 18 | 13 | 58.1 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 13 | 12 | 52.0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | 3.51 | 1.06 | 76.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 18 | 15 | 54.5 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 0.80 | 3.23 | 19.8 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| OT | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 54 | 46 | 54.0 | 40 | 33 | 54.8 | 32 | 22 | 59.3 | 36 | 31 | 53.7 | 10 | 7 | 58.8 | 7.88 | 5.13 | 60.6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
Win Probability
CGY Favored
NJD Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
CGY
NJD
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
NJD Attempts
CGY Attempts
Individual Event Map
NJD ShootCGY Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CGY) performed against every skater on the away team (NJD) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = CGY players, Columns = NJD players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the CGY player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| CGY ↓ / NJD → | Mercer | Hischier | Hughes | Glass | Palat | Bratt | Cotter | Dadonov | Gritsyuk | Meier | Hameenaho | Brown | Siegenthaler | Hamilton | Dillon | Pesce | Nemec | Hughes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Backlund | 50 | 60 | 43 | 29 | 67 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 38 | 33 | 20 | 40 | 27 | 70 | 43 | 80 | 20 |
| Sharangovich | 50 | 63 | 47 | 25 | 67 | 43 | — | 0 | 20 | 50 | 43 | 100 | 44 | 33 | 71 | 54 | 60 | 17 |
| Frost | 82 | 70 | 40 | 50 | 63 | 50 | 67 | 0 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 86 | 67 | 100 |
| Kadri | 100 | 43 | 23 | 42 | 100 | 33 | 67 | 100 | 33 | 75 | 40 | 33 | 58 | 64 | 40 | 25 | 44 | 17 |
| Zary | 100 | 56 | 10 | 36 | 67 | 25 | 33 | 33 | 31 | 25 | 36 | 20 | 40 | 50 | 43 | 31 | 44 | 17 |
| Kirkland | 60 | — | 50 | 13 | 100 | 33 | 75 | 86 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 75 | 40 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 40 | 0 |
| Farabee | 57 | 57 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 38 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 57 | 40 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 75 | 57 | 100 |
| Huberdeau | 67 | 63 | 50 | 43 | 67 | 43 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 50 | 46 | 57 | 67 | 67 | 33 | 67 |
| Lomberg | 100 | — | 67 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 80 | 75 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 75 | 67 | 67 | 63 | 33 | 58 | 0 |
| Coronato | 50 | 57 | 54 | 17 | 75 | 42 | — | 0 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 43 | 57 | 44 | 60 | 20 |
| Gridin | 100 | 43 | 11 | 42 | 100 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 29 | 50 | 33 | 20 | 40 | 45 | 45 | 29 | 60 | 17 |
| Klapka | 100 | — | 50 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 78 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 60 | 100 | 67 | 33 | 50 | 0 |
| Weegar | 67 | 67 | 38 | 36 | 60 | 31 | 50 | 38 | 40 | 50 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 47 | 63 | 31 | 67 | 33 |
| Bahl | 56 | 60 | 50 | 22 | 80 | 47 | 80 | 75 | 17 | 44 | 17 | 60 | 55 | 61 | 60 | 40 | 47 | 25 |
| Whitecloud | 59 | 50 | 56 | 22 | 80 | 50 | 86 | 80 | 20 | 50 | 20 | 67 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 50 | 53 | 33 |
| Kuznetsov | 57 | 57 | 40 | 30 | 50 | 25 | 60 | 38 | 38 | 44 | 38 | 50 | 36 | 42 | 57 | 25 | 83 | 33 |
| Brzustewicz | 100 | 50 | 18 | 33 | 100 | 33 | 67 | 67 | 23 | 50 | 31 | 33 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 47 | 40 | 17 |
| Hanley | 100 | 20 | 25 | 33 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 67 | 29 | 100 | 38 | 22 | 45 | 44 | 38 | 36 | 56 | 20 |
