Game Recap
The Anaheim Ducks edged the Los Angeles Kings 2-1 in overtime on January 17, 2026. At 5-on-5, ANA carried the play with 8.10 expected goals and a 55.4% share of shot attempts. ANA had a commanding 33-18 edge in shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Los Angeles Kings vs Anaheim Ducks progressed on Jan 17, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
LAK1 - 2ANA (OT)
Jan 17, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| ANA | P1 | 17 | 16 | 51.5 | 14 | 7 | 66.7 | 7 | 3 | 70.0 | 13 | 14 | 48.1 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | 3.98 | 1.18 | 77.1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 13 | 24 | 35.1 | 11 | 18 | 37.9 | 9 | 8 | 52.9 | 7 | 20 | 25.9 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 2.74 | 3.98 | 40.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 22 | 19 | 53.7 | 17 | 11 | 60.7 | 13 | 7 | 65.0 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 2.92 | 1.15 | 71.7 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| OT | 7 | 1 | 87.5 | 6 | 1 | 85.7 | 4 | 0 | 100.0 | 7 | 1 | 87.5 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 1.44 | 0.11 | 93.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 59 | 60 | 49.6 | 48 | 37 | 56.5 | 33 | 18 | 64.7 | 37 | 45 | 45.1 | 11 | 8 | 57.9 | 11.09 | 6.42 | 63.3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| LAK | P1 | 16 | 17 | 48.5 | 7 | 14 | 33.3 | 3 | 7 | 30.0 | 14 | 13 | 51.9 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 1.18 | 3.98 | 22.9 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 24 | 13 | 64.9 | 18 | 11 | 62.1 | 8 | 9 | 47.1 | 20 | 7 | 74.1 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | 3.98 | 2.74 | 59.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 19 | 22 | 46.3 | 11 | 17 | 39.3 | 7 | 13 | 35.0 | 10 | 10 | 50.0 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 1.15 | 2.92 | 28.3 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| OT | 1 | 7 | 12.5 | 1 | 6 | 14.3 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 1 | 7 | 12.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.11 | 1.44 | 7.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 60 | 59 | 50.4 | 37 | 48 | 43.5 | 18 | 33 | 35.3 | 45 | 37 | 54.9 | 8 | 11 | 42.1 | 6.42 | 11.09 | 36.7 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
ANA Favored
LAK Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
ANA
LAK
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
LAK Attempts
ANA Attempts
Individual Event Map
LAK ShootANA Shoot
Goal
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (ANA) performed against every skater on the away team (LAK) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = ANA players, Columns = LAK players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the ANA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| ANA ↓ / LAK → | Turcotte | Helenius | Fiala | Foegele | Kuzmenko | Lee | Malott | Byfield | Laferriere | Armia | Kempe | Ward | Clarke | Doughty | Anderson | Edmundson | Ceci | Dumoulin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granlund | 11 | 33 | 27 | 44 | 17 | 33 | 56 | 53 | 52 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 38 | 48 | 68 | 80 | 100 | — |
| McTavish | 50 | 100 | 50 | 40 | 33 | 80 | — | 52 | 80 | 57 | 33 | 71 | 56 | 71 | 65 | 86 | 62 | 33 |
| Poehling | 56 | 0 | 25 | 25 | 7 | 43 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 43 | 25 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 83 | 38 | 33 |
| Strome | 33 | 100 | 36 | 47 | 33 | 100 | — | 55 | 50 | 55 | 25 | 60 | 33 | 69 | 65 | 50 | 44 | 33 |
| Washe | 29 | — | 57 | 17 | 57 | 0 | — | 40 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Harkins | 67 | 0 | 64 | 20 | 33 | 44 | 100 | 17 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 67 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 80 | 43 | 38 |
| Killorn | 50 | 33 | 15 | 75 | 13 | 33 | 56 | 42 | 63 | 58 | 43 | 63 | 32 | 54 | 62 | 63 | — | — |
| Gauthier | 25 | 100 | 43 | 38 | 25 | 60 | — | 50 | 75 | 55 | 33 | 71 | 50 | 69 | 59 | 90 | 57 | 29 |
| Johnston | 80 | — | 100 | 67 | 80 | 0 | — | 100 | 0 | 100 | — | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 67 | 67 |
| Viel | 75 | 0 | 71 | 33 | 50 | 57 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 86 | 50 | 50 |
| Sennecke | 33 | 33 | 80 | 57 | 50 | 33 | 56 | 78 | 74 | 70 | 69 | 63 | 70 | 62 | 64 | 80 | 80 | 0 |
| Trouba | 55 | 0 | 35 | 50 | 33 | 60 | 71 | 43 | 57 | 56 | 47 | 29 | 42 | 43 | 67 | 71 | 100 | 100 |
| LaCombe | 67 | 0 | 53 | 75 | 38 | 60 | 71 | 64 | 71 | 72 | 64 | 67 | 67 | 79 | 71 | 78 | 83 | 50 |
| Mintyukov | 45 | — | 41 | 13 | 23 | 25 | — | 22 | 47 | 55 | 21 | 50 | 40 | 38 | 71 | 89 | 33 | 25 |
| Zellweger | 13 | 67 | 17 | 14 | 13 | 57 | 50 | 13 | 31 | 36 | 27 | 33 | 30 | 21 | 31 | 75 | 50 | 50 |
| Gudas | 9 | 60 | 30 | 6 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 17 | 26 | 22 | 30 | 30 | 44 | 19 | 31 | 67 | 38 | 38 |
| Helleson | 50 | 100 | 50 | 40 | 30 | 40 | — | 42 | 67 | 75 | 50 | 75 | 58 | 75 | 63 | 100 | 38 | 25 |
| Moore | 57 | — | 100 | 40 | 100 | 0 | — | 100 | 0 | 100 | — | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
