Game Recap
The Columbus Blue Jackets defeated the Pittsburgh Penguins 4-3 in a shootout on January 17, 2026. Despite the result, the Pittsburgh Penguins held the edge in expected goals (8.97 to 6.79) at 5-on-5, indicating the Columbus Blue Jackets received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Pittsburgh Penguins created 13 high-danger scoring chances compared to 10 from the Columbus Blue Jackets at 5-on-5. Noel Acciari was the most dangerous skater with 1.91 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Pittsburgh Penguins outshot the Columbus Blue Jackets 36-30 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Columbus Blue Jackets vs Pittsburgh Penguins progressed on Jan 17, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CBJ4 - 3PIT (SO)
Jan 17, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| PIT | P1 | 26 | 14 | 65.0 | 19 | 7 | 73.1 | 10 | 4 | 71.4 | 17 | 8 | 68.0 | 7 | 5 | 58.3 | 5.20 | 1.26 | 80.5 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 |
| P2 | 14 | 22 | 38.9 | 10 | 20 | 33.3 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 12 | 17 | 41.4 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 3.15 | 4.30 | 42.3 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 29 | 16 | 64.4 | 18 | 9 | 66.7 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 22 | 12 | 64.7 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 4.87 | 2.73 | 64.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| OT | 10 | 3 | 76.9 | 8 | 3 | 72.7 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 10 | 3 | 76.9 | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | 3.32 | 0.87 | 79.2 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| SO | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1.53 | 1.75 | 46.8 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| Total | 82 | 59 | 58.2 | 58 | 43 | 57.4 | 36 | 30 | 54.5 | 64 | 44 | 59.3 | 26 | 15 | 63.4 | 18.06 | 10.91 | 62.3 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | |
| CBJ | P1 | 14 | 26 | 35.0 | 7 | 19 | 26.9 | 4 | 10 | 28.6 | 8 | 17 | 32.0 | 5 | 7 | 41.7 | 1.26 | 5.20 | 19.5 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 |
| P2 | 22 | 14 | 61.1 | 20 | 10 | 66.7 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 17 | 12 | 58.6 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 4.30 | 3.15 | 57.7 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 16 | 29 | 35.6 | 9 | 18 | 33.3 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 12 | 22 | 35.3 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 2.73 | 4.87 | 36.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| OT | 3 | 10 | 23.1 | 3 | 8 | 27.3 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 3 | 10 | 23.1 | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | 0.87 | 3.32 | 20.8 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| SO | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1.75 | 1.53 | 53.2 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| Total | 59 | 82 | 41.8 | 43 | 58 | 42.6 | 30 | 36 | 45.5 | 44 | 64 | 40.7 | 15 | 26 | 36.6 | 10.91 | 18.06 | 37.7 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | |
Win Probability
PIT Favored
CBJ Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
PIT
CBJ
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CBJ Attempts
PIT Attempts
Individual Event Map
CBJ ShootPIT Shoot
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PIT) performed against every skater on the away team (CBJ) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = PIT players, Columns = CBJ players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the PIT player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| PIT ↓ / CBJ → | Fantilli | Jenner | Coyle | Monahan | Johnson | Sillinger | Gaunce | Heinen | Voronkov | Aston-Reese | Marchenko | Olivier | Werenski | Severson | Provorov | Gudbranson | Zamula | Fabbro |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crosby | 54 | 77 | 44 | 79 | 71 | 56 | 67 | 44 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 76 | 50 | 56 | 82 | 55 | 100 |
| Malkin | 92 | 67 | 50 | 82 | 67 | 82 | 57 | 71 | 33 | 40 | 92 | 55 | 68 | 50 | 71 | 76 | 75 | 100 |
| Kindel | 60 | 60 | 70 | 60 | 67 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 75 | 0 | 50 | 63 | 53 | 50 | 79 | 43 | 11 | 100 |
| Novak | 100 | 83 | 45 | 80 | 67 | 90 | 67 | 60 | 33 | 40 | 100 | 44 | 65 | 55 | 86 | 79 | 75 | — |
| Acciari | 40 | 18 | 100 | 25 | 33 | 50 | 25 | 43 | 50 | 33 | 25 | 100 | 33 | 30 | 44 | 50 | 40 | 17 |
| Dewar | 40 | 27 | 100 | 38 | 57 | 0 | 25 | 43 | 50 | 33 | 25 | 100 | 42 | 30 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 17 |
| Lizotte | 40 | 22 | 80 | 33 | 43 | 0 | 25 | 43 | 67 | 33 | 25 | 67 | 38 | 25 | 43 | 50 | 40 | 17 |
| Rakell | 47 | 71 | 50 | 74 | 65 | 62 | 67 | 44 | 100 | 50 | 44 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 52 | 63 | 47 | 100 |
| Rust | 42 | 74 | 44 | 79 | 71 | 53 | 67 | 44 | 100 | 50 | 42 | 50 | 70 | 50 | 56 | 69 | 55 | 100 |
| Chinakhov | 70 | 50 | 29 | 56 | 47 | 75 | 67 | 60 | 33 | 40 | 60 | 14 | 53 | 22 | 57 | 67 | 43 | — |
| Mantha | 60 | 60 | 78 | 50 | 56 | 50 | 0 | 67 | 100 | 0 | 45 | 67 | 50 | 46 | 73 | 54 | 0 | 100 |
| Brazeau | 83 | 86 | 67 | 80 | 83 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 75 | 0 | 71 | 63 | 56 | 58 | 79 | 67 | 0 | 100 |
| Letang | 57 | 77 | 52 | 85 | 76 | 61 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 38 | 50 | 60 | 66 | 55 | 60 | 77 | 56 | 75 |
| Kulak | 57 | 69 | 36 | 75 | 73 | 47 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 33 | 53 | 30 | 60 | 44 | 54 | 55 | 22 | 67 |
| Shea | 78 | 62 | 78 | 58 | 64 | 83 | 67 | 80 | 67 | 67 | 76 | 71 | 68 | 60 | 82 | 75 | 38 | 100 |
| Clifton | 91 | 62 | 67 | 58 | 62 | 80 | 50 | 67 | 67 | 50 | 91 | 50 | 67 | 40 | 75 | 82 | 40 | 67 |
| Wotherspoon | 25 | 29 | 58 | 13 | 25 | 44 | 60 | 43 | 67 | 0 | 18 | 60 | 23 | 35 | 56 | 25 | 45 | 0 |
| St. Ivany | 30 | 23 | 50 | 20 | 25 | 38 | 50 | 20 | 63 | 0 | 18 | 50 | 29 | 28 | 53 | 20 | 36 | 0 |
