Game Recap
The Detroit Red Wings defeated the San Jose Sharks 4-2 on January 16, 2026. The Detroit Red Wings controlled play with 58.9% Corsi and generated 8.96 expected goals compared to 7.16 from the San Jose Sharks at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. Marco Kasper was the most dangerous skater with 2.89 individual expected goals on 4 shots at 5-on-5. The Detroit Red Wings outshot the San Jose Sharks 25-22 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as San Jose Sharks vs Detroit Red Wings progressed on Jan 16, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
SJS2 - 4DET
Jan 16, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| DET | P1 | 27 | 14 | 65.9 | 21 | 11 | 65.6 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 20 | 13 | 60.6 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 4.12 | 4.16 | 49.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 23 | 12 | 65.7 | 15 | 5 | 75.0 | 9 | 4 | 69.2 | 19 | 5 | 79.2 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | 3.04 | 1.00 | 75.3 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 16 | 21 | 43.2 | 13 | 12 | 52.0 | 7 | 11 | 38.9 | 9 | 17 | 34.6 | 3 | 9 | 25.0 | 3.23 | 3.10 | 51.1 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 66 | 47 | 58.4 | 49 | 28 | 63.6 | 25 | 22 | 53.2 | 48 | 35 | 57.8 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 10.39 | 8.25 | 55.7 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | |
| SJS | P1 | 14 | 27 | 34.1 | 11 | 21 | 34.4 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 13 | 20 | 39.4 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 4.16 | 4.12 | 50.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 12 | 23 | 34.3 | 5 | 15 | 25.0 | 4 | 9 | 30.8 | 5 | 19 | 20.8 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 1.00 | 3.04 | 24.7 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 21 | 16 | 56.8 | 12 | 13 | 48.0 | 11 | 7 | 61.1 | 17 | 9 | 65.4 | 9 | 3 | 75.0 | 3.10 | 3.23 | 48.9 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 47 | 66 | 41.6 | 28 | 49 | 36.4 | 22 | 25 | 46.8 | 35 | 48 | 42.2 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 8.25 | 10.39 | 44.3 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
DET Favored
SJS Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
DET
SJS
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
SJS Attempts
DET Attempts
Individual Event Map
SJS ShootDET Shoot
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (DET) performed against every skater on the away team (SJS) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = DET players, Columns = SJS players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the DET player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| DET ↓ / SJS → | Celebrini | Smith | Wennberg | Toffoli | Misa | Goodrow | Ostapchuk | Regenda | Eklund | Chernyshov | Graf | Gaudette | Orlov | Dickinson | Klingberg | Liljegren | Ferraro | Leddy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larkin | 32 | 38 | 93 | 70 | 50 | 86 | — | 39 | 86 | 42 | 42 | 0 | 45 | 61 | 41 | 73 | 50 | 67 |
| Copp | 69 | 74 | 67 | 40 | 69 | 75 | 50 | 54 | 0 | 64 | 83 | 0 | 56 | 73 | 71 | 67 | 78 | 67 |
| Kasper | 50 | 67 | 78 | 56 | 75 | 67 | 67 | 77 | 60 | 88 | 56 | 67 | 56 | 58 | 50 | 67 | 79 | 80 |
| Finnie | 40 | 57 | 71 | 60 | 75 | 71 | 71 | 64 | 64 | 60 | 75 | 67 | 44 | 71 | 67 | 69 | 79 | 82 |
| Rasmussen | 38 | 50 | 67 | 40 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 40 | 33 | 33 | 20 | 30 | 36 | 20 | 75 | 75 | 25 |
| Appleton | 50 | 60 | 75 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 43 | 43 | 33 | 43 | 50 | 33 | 75 | 75 | 25 |
| Raymond | 41 | 48 | 93 | 70 | 50 | 86 | — | 50 | 86 | 63 | 50 | 0 | 56 | 71 | 44 | 73 | 50 | 80 |
| van Riemsdyk | 47 | 46 | 93 | 86 | 100 | 86 | — | 36 | 83 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 100 | 45 | 85 | 67 | 80 |
| Compher | 67 | 80 | 56 | 43 | 69 | 71 | 71 | 82 | 54 | 86 | 75 | 67 | 67 | 71 | 50 | 69 | 79 | 82 |
| Soderblom | 80 | 83 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 43 | 43 | 33 | 67 | 56 | 67 | 75 | 80 | 25 |
| DeBrincat | 52 | 72 | 85 | 33 | 67 | 88 | 0 | 53 | 0 | 41 | 56 | 0 | 53 | 61 | 69 | 68 | 57 | 50 |
| Kane | 67 | 76 | 75 | 50 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 64 | 0 | 53 | 58 | 73 | 67 | 78 | 57 |
| Seider | 36 | 39 | 88 | 64 | 56 | 91 | 80 | 38 | 71 | 31 | 44 | 57 | 41 | 61 | 46 | 70 | 57 | 83 |
| Edvinsson | 41 | 49 | 88 | 82 | 79 | 83 | 80 | 49 | 73 | 50 | 46 | 57 | 45 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 74 | 83 |
| Chiarot | 50 | 82 | 50 | 33 | 60 | 20 | 25 | 71 | 38 | 63 | 55 | 20 | 53 | 59 | 54 | 25 | 42 | 69 |
| Johansson | 75 | 100 | 56 | 40 | 57 | 50 | — | 73 | 40 | 60 | 67 | 0 | 60 | 54 | 62 | 73 | 89 | 38 |
| Bernard-Docker | 83 | 90 | 80 | 67 | 71 | 100 | — | 71 | 75 | 57 | 64 | 0 | 67 | 50 | 86 | 80 | 92 | 33 |
| Sandin-Pellikka | 67 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 40 | 40 | 50 | 100 | 75 | 75 | 25 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 71 |
