Philadelphia Flyers vs Pittsburgh Penguins — January 15, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

Goals came in bunches as the Pittsburgh Penguins outlasted the Philadelphia Flyers 6-3 on January 15, 2026. PIT got the two points, but PHI held a 12.15-8.93 expected goals edge at even strength. PHI outshot PIT 34-30.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Philadelphia Flyers vs Pittsburgh Penguins progressed on Jan 15, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

PHI3 - 6PIT

Jan 15, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
PIT	P1	23	21	52.3	20	13	60.6	13	8	61.9	14	17	45.2	5	6	45.5	4.84	3.07	61.2	2	0	100.0
	P2	19	34	35.8	15	27	35.7	13	17	43.3	14	24	36.8	7	10	41.2	4.71	7.88	37.4	2	1	66.7
	P3	14	17	45.2	10	16	38.5	4	9	30.8	11	12	47.8	6	5	54.5	2.65	4.71	36.0	2	2	50.0
	Total	56	72	43.8	45	56	44.6	30	34	46.9	39	53	42.4	18	21	46.2	12.20	15.66	43.8	6	3	66.7
PHI	P1	21	23	47.7	13	20	39.4	8	13	38.1	17	14	54.8	6	5	54.5	3.07	4.84	38.8	0	2	0.0
	P2	34	19	64.2	27	15	64.3	17	13	56.7	24	14	63.2	10	7	58.8	7.88	4.71	62.6	1	2	33.3
	P3	17	14	54.8	16	10	61.5	9	4	69.2	12	11	52.2	5	6	45.5	4.71	2.65	64.0	2	2	50.0
	Total	72	56	56.3	56	45	55.4	34	30	53.1	53	39	57.6	21	18	53.8	15.66	12.20	56.2	3	6	33.3

Win Probability

PIT Favored

PHI Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

PIT

PHI

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

PHI Attempts

PIT Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

PHI ShootPIT Shoot

Save

Goal Against

Missed Shot Against

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PIT) performed against every skater on the away team (PHI) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = PIT players, Columns = PHI players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the PIT player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

PIT ↓ / PHI →	Dvorak	Couturier	Zegras	Barkey	Abols	Cates	Konecny	Tippett	Grebenkin	Michkov	Grundstrom	Hathaway	York	Sanheim	Drysdale	Seeler	Juulsen	Andrae
Crosby	84	55	38	22	100	41	78	33	78	17	100	67	57	57	63	64	45	38
Malkin	81	48	38	25	100	33	67	44	67	25	100	50	68	56	50	35	20	36
Acciari	67	17	27	17	44	25	54	43	55	25	44	38	20	17	46	33	67	86
Dewar	55	50	17	33	44	20	55	23	63	20	44	38	17	0	40	60	100	86
Novak	60	22	24	25	83	40	38	45	50	26	86	100	36	29	60	22	27	56
Lizotte	60	29	13	29	14	100	46	25	75	67	14	0	50	14	30	22	60	83
Kindel	50	63	20	43	67	0	56	20	53	43	75	67	45	44	69	50	75	83
Rust	80	58	33	25	100	39	70	30	78	20	100	67	55	55	63	64	45	43
Rakell	84	48	40	22	100	54	78	43	78	11	100	67	70	62	63	50	42	38
Brazeau	60	63	33	60	78	0	64	33	63	60	83	71	56	50	80	55	73	88
Mantha	63	57	50	50	80	—	67	50	64	50	85	75	57	50	81	60	78	88
Chinakhov	67	31	33	27	100	33	60	40	60	27	100	—	42	33	54	33	30	46
Letang	78	52	37	36	44	44	70	41	64	25	58	44	60	47	55	35	67	70
Shea	50	19	28	6	88	33	41	33	58	14	89	88	42	60	54	46	32	56
St. Ivany	63	35	33	38	67	100	63	43	67	36	67	60	55	45	61	64	50	40
Wotherspoon	63	55	13	50	67	22	63	25	59	50	67	60	33	31	61	64	80	67
Kulak	57	15	33	25	38	41	70	41	54	15	55	20	33	21	47	28	75	71
Clifton	50	30	22	9	80	21	41	24	58	25	83	80	29	40	40	46	46	86