Game Recap
The Tampa Bay Lightning defeated the Pittsburgh Penguins 2-1 in a shootout on January 13, 2026. The Tampa Bay Lightning controlled play with 59.3% Corsi and generated 8.75 expected goals compared to 6.34 from the Pittsburgh Penguins at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Tampa Bay Lightning created 14 high-danger scoring chances compared to 5 from the Pittsburgh Penguins at 5-on-5. Brandon Hagel was the most dangerous skater with 1.83 individual expected goals on 3 shots at 5-on-5. The Tampa Bay Lightning outshot the Pittsburgh Penguins 34-29 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Tampa Bay Lightning vs Pittsburgh Penguins progressed on Jan 13, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
TBL2 - 1PIT (SO)
Jan 13, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| PIT | P1 | 15 | 20 | 42.9 | 12 | 15 | 44.4 | 8 | 10 | 44.4 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 6 | 4 | 60.0 | 4.83 | 1.84 | 72.5 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 17 | 21 | 44.7 | 12 | 16 | 42.9 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 10 | 16 | 38.5 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 2.30 | 3.52 | 39.5 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 13 | 18 | 41.9 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 6 | 11 | 35.3 | 10 | 11 | 47.6 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 3.02 | 3.54 | 46.1 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| OT | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 6 | 1 | 85.7 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 2.28 | 0.57 | 80.1 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| SO | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 0.85 | 1.43 | 37.3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| Total | 54 | 64 | 45.8 | 45 | 48 | 48.4 | 29 | 34 | 46.0 | 41 | 46 | 47.1 | 14 | 16 | 46.7 | 13.28 | 10.89 | 54.9 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | |
| TBL | P1 | 20 | 15 | 57.1 | 15 | 12 | 55.6 | 10 | 8 | 55.6 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 4 | 6 | 40.0 | 1.84 | 4.83 | 27.5 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 21 | 17 | 55.3 | 16 | 12 | 57.1 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 16 | 10 | 61.5 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 3.52 | 2.30 | 60.5 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 18 | 13 | 58.1 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 11 | 6 | 64.7 | 11 | 10 | 52.4 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 3.54 | 3.02 | 53.9 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| OT | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 1 | 6 | 14.3 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 0.57 | 2.28 | 19.9 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| SO | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 1.43 | 0.85 | 62.7 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| Total | 64 | 54 | 54.2 | 48 | 45 | 51.6 | 34 | 29 | 54.0 | 46 | 41 | 52.9 | 16 | 14 | 53.3 | 10.89 | 13.28 | 45.1 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | |
Win Probability
PIT Favored
TBL Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
PIT
TBL
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
TBL Attempts
PIT Attempts
Individual Event Map
TBL ShootPIT Shoot
Save
Goal Against
Missed Shot Against
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PIT) performed against every skater on the away team (TBL) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = PIT players, Columns = TBL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the PIT player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| PIT ↓ / TBL → | Guentzel | Gourde | Girgensons | Cirelli | James | Goncalves | Finley | Hagel | Paul | Kucherov | Holmberg | Bjorkstrand | Raddysh | D'Astous | Moser | Crozier | Cernak | Carlile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crosby | 40 | 50 | 50 | 89 | 100 | 50 | — | 82 | 33 | 40 | 44 | — | 50 | 50 | 59 | 50 | 77 | 25 |
| Kindel | 42 | 60 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 14 | — | 0 | 36 | 57 | 50 | 0 | 30 | 14 | 45 | 100 | 25 | 50 |
| Lizotte | 14 | 0 | — | 13 | 42 | 33 | 50 | 13 | 33 | 8 | 0 | 33 | 7 | 50 | 11 | 20 | 63 | 0 |
| Malkin | 67 | 67 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 86 | 100 | 84 | 83 | 57 | 100 | — | 75 | 83 | 100 | 80 | 91 | 67 |
| Dewar | 11 | 0 | — | 13 | 50 | 40 | 67 | 11 | 50 | 7 | — | 29 | 6 | 67 | 11 | 33 | 71 | 0 |
| Acciari | 20 | 0 | — | 13 | 50 | 40 | 57 | 14 | 50 | 9 | — | 44 | 8 | 67 | 11 | 33 | 71 | 0 |
| Novak | 40 | 0 | 33 | 67 | 100 | 83 | 100 | 78 | 60 | 33 | 50 | — | 25 | 67 | 0 | 82 | 50 | 70 |
| Rust | 30 | 50 | 50 | 89 | 50 | 100 | 0 | 75 | 38 | 30 | 41 | — | 42 | 43 | 59 | 38 | 85 | 25 |
| Rakell | 44 | 48 | 48 | 89 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 90 | 33 | 44 | 38 | — | 50 | 47 | 57 | 38 | 77 | 25 |
| Brazeau | 33 | 50 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 27 | 50 | 33 | 0 | 22 | 13 | 40 | 100 | 13 | 0 |
| Mantha | 53 | 75 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 25 | — | 33 | 46 | 70 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 55 | 100 | 25 | 50 |
| Chinakhov | 43 | 0 | 100 | 67 | 100 | 83 | 100 | 78 | 57 | 33 | 100 | — | 50 | 60 | — | 80 | 50 | 67 |
| Letang | 44 | 56 | 56 | 75 | 63 | 80 | 80 | 88 | 44 | 44 | 50 | 25 | 44 | 73 | 55 | 71 | 100 | 60 |
| Kulak | 33 | 50 | 46 | 50 | 38 | 80 | 43 | 60 | 33 | 27 | 36 | 0 | 35 | 43 | 35 | 45 | 67 | 50 |
| Wotherspoon | 18 | 44 | 43 | 25 | 45 | 38 | 50 | 20 | 33 | 18 | 33 | 25 | 20 | 44 | 43 | 20 | 54 | 33 |
| St. Ivany | 36 | 40 | 38 | 33 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 27 | 50 | 33 | 44 | 33 | 29 | 50 | 44 | 60 | 50 | 33 |
| Shea | 24 | 43 | 67 | 0 | 100 | 17 | 100 | 0 | 38 | 20 | 71 | 17 | 19 | 44 | 27 | 100 | 17 | 67 |
| Clifton | 38 | 25 | 50 | 0 | 100 | 13 | 100 | 0 | 42 | 27 | 50 | 100 | 17 | 27 | 20 | 75 | 22 | 50 |
