Florida Panthers vs Buffalo Sabres — January 12, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Buffalo Sabres fell to the Florida Panthers 4-3 on Monday. FLA generated 13 high-danger looks compared to just 7 from BUF. Keep an eye on Lundell — 2.29 individual xG on 4 shots at 5-on-5. At 5-on-5, FLA carried the play with 9.38 expected goals and a 57.3% share of shot attempts. Greer put up 2 goals. FLA outshot BUF 32-23.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Florida Panthers vs Buffalo Sabres progressed on Jan 12, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

FLA4 - 3BUF

Jan 12, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
BUF	P1	19	22	46.3	14	17	45.2	7	11	38.9	8	12	40.0	3	2	60.0	3.38	2.32	59.3	1	2	33.3
	P2	18	19	48.6	15	13	53.6	10	9	52.6	13	15	46.4	1	3	25.0	1.87	2.61	41.7	1	0	100.0
	P3	20	29	40.8	14	20	41.2	6	12	33.3	10	15	40.0	3	10	23.1	3.35	5.54	37.7	1	2	33.3
	Total	57	70	44.9	43	50	46.2	23	32	41.8	31	42	42.5	7	15	31.8	8.60	10.47	45.1	3	4	42.9
FLA	P1	22	19	53.7	17	14	54.8	11	7	61.1	12	8	60.0	2	3	40.0	2.32	3.38	40.7	2	1	66.7
	P2	19	18	51.4	13	15	46.4	9	10	47.4	15	13	53.6	3	1	75.0	2.61	1.87	58.3	0	1	0.0
	P3	29	20	59.2	20	14	58.8	12	6	66.7	15	10	60.0	10	3	76.9	5.54	3.35	62.3	2	1	66.7
	Total	70	57	55.1	50	43	53.8	32	23	58.2	42	31	57.5	15	7	68.2	10.47	8.60	54.9	4	3	57.1

Win Probability

BUF Favored

FLA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

BUF

FLA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

FLA Attempts

BUF Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

FLA ShootBUF Shoot

Goal

Missed Shot

Hit

Hit Taken

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (BUF) performed against every skater on the away team (FLA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = BUF players, Columns = FLA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the BUF player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

BUF ↓ / FLA →	Reinhart	Verhaeghe	Lundell	Bennett	Luostarinen	Rodrigues	Boqvist	Kunin	Studnicka	Greer	Vilmanis	Samoskevich	Forsling	Ekblad	Mikkola	Balinskis	Petry	Sebrango
Thompson	52	57	50	52	48	38	100	50	—	63	14	17	52	53	47	52	38	14
Norris	41	50	42	50	43	25	100	83	100	60	20	20	41	44	43	47	67	100
Krebs	50	65	58	59	55	57	—	—	100	71	25	25	57	57	56	52	71	—
McLeod	45	47	60	38	58	36	50	50	75	46	17	13	45	45	57	42	43	33
Dunne	0	33	0	33	—	0	75	75	75	50	0	0	0	—	29	67	40	50
Zucker	45	55	42	55	43	29	100	83	100	55	25	25	42	48	46	50	50	67
Benson	47	25	53	25	50	9	100	100	100	29	0	7	31	33	31	42	38	20
Greenway	0	17	0	17	—	17	75	75	75	20	17	17	0	—	25	40	33	43
Malenstyn	0	33	0	33	—	0	75	75	75	50	0	0	0	—	29	67	40	50
Tuch	42	50	40	53	45	29	80	67	75	64	25	20	38	42	54	56	40	60
Doan	52	54	53	46	45	33	100	100	—	61	14	8	45	48	46	50	40	17
Quinn	50	46	67	42	70	33	100	100	100	36	14	25	56	63	43	36	50	38
Dahlin	38	42	43	44	42	13	80	67	80	52	0	0	39	36	52	46	27	29
Byram	54	63	48	50	52	46	75	75	67	60	18	25	52	55	42	55	50	38
Samuelsson	38	38	45	36	41	20	67	67	67	44	20	17	30	36	46	50	23	20
Power	56	61	50	47	50	33	80	80	80	54	11	11	48	58	36	55	54	43
Metsa	0	33	50	33	50	10	100	100	100	33	10	10	0	0	25	14	50	43
Bryson	0	100	50	100	50	13	100	100	100	100	13	13	0	0	33	20	67	60