Columbus Blue Jackets vs Utah Mammoth — January 11, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

After a back-and-forth affair, the Columbus Blue Jackets pulled out a 3-2 win in overtime on Sunday. The expected goals told the same story: CBJ 9.64, UTA 6.18 at 5-on-5. CBJ outshot UTA 36-27.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Columbus Blue Jackets vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Jan 11, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

CBJ3 - 2UTA (OT)

Jan 11, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
UTA	P1	22	22	50.0	12	19	38.7	7	11	38.9	19	12	61.3	7	3	70.0	3.89	3.95	49.7	1	1	50.0
	P2	21	28	42.9	13	17	43.3	8	14	36.4	13	24	35.1	2	7	22.2	1.40	5.90	19.2	1	1	50.0
	P3	23	19	54.8	16	13	55.2	12	9	57.1	11	14	44.0	5	4	55.6	2.05	2.82	42.1	0	0	—
	OT	0	5	0.0	0	4	0.0	0	2	0.0	0	5	0.0	0	2	0.0	0.00	1.06	0.0	0	1	0.0
	Total	66	74	47.1	41	53	43.6	27	36	42.9	43	55	43.9	14	16	46.7	7.35	13.72	34.9	2	3	40.0
CBJ	P1	22	22	50.0	19	12	61.3	11	7	61.1	12	19	38.7	3	7	30.0	3.95	3.89	50.3	1	1	50.0
	P2	28	21	57.1	17	13	56.7	14	8	63.6	24	13	64.9	7	2	77.8	5.90	1.40	80.8	1	1	50.0
	P3	19	23	45.2	13	16	44.8	9	12	42.9	14	11	56.0	4	5	44.4	2.82	2.05	57.9	0	0	—
	OT	5	0	100.0	4	0	100.0	2	0	100.0	5	0	100.0	2	0	100.0	1.06	0.00	100.0	1	0	100.0
	Total	74	66	52.9	53	41	56.4	36	27	57.1	55	43	56.1	16	14	53.3	13.72	7.35	65.1	3	2	60.0

Win Probability

UTA Favored

CBJ Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

UTA

CBJ

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

CBJ Attempts

UTA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

CBJ ShootUTA Shoot

Shot on Net

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Hit Taken

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (CBJ) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = UTA players, Columns = CBJ players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

UTA ↓ / CBJ →	Coyle	Fantilli	Gaunce	Sillinger	Jenner	Johnson	Monahan	Voronkov	Pyyhtia	Heinen	Marchenko	Olivier	Werenski	Provorov	Severson	Fabbro	Zamula	Mateychuk
Schmaltz	50	47	70	61	82	60	67	40	60	33	50	64	62	47	77	60	63	—
McBain	64	80	14	80	50	33	38	70	17	17	89	78	64	50	56	63	55	—
Stenlund	20	33	14	33	56	35	50	25	20	33	29	22	24	33	40	80	40	—
Hayton	40	42	44	50	33	0	29	33	36	38	53	33	29	43	30	100	33	—
Crouse	33	36	67	50	78	31	71	50	71	50	38	56	46	36	79	54	58	—
Carcone	50	60	20	75	23	11	23	57	29	25	60	60	42	44	11	67	45	—
But	64	78	14	75	47	33	36	70	22	17	88	78	64	47	50	63	46	—
Tanev	20	100	0	100	71	71	67	14	0	17	100	14	33	67	36	75	33	—
Keller	50	57	70	65	83	50	75	50	60	33	63	69	63	60	76	63	75	—
Guenther	38	42	62	62	67	50	33	33	43	43	53	43	43	50	36	80	60	—
Peterka	42	50	73	65	50	0	0	33	60	60	60	45	57	50	40	91	56	—
Yamamoto	17	100	13	—	71	71	67	13	17	29	100	13	36	67	33	75	25	—
Sergachev	38	35	69	56	50	13	33	50	57	50	41	58	37	45	48	64	62	—
Durzi	70	43	71	48	56	17	36	60	56	67	48	73	57	39	48	68	61	—
Cole	30	47	20	67	57	32	45	36	25	33	47	36	33	45	42	73	47	—
Schmidt	33	80	14	80	67	67	63	36	18	17	78	33	53	45	38	67	32	—
Marino	43	78	20	100	50	67	50	40	18	20	89	36	55	45	53	75	31	—
DeSimone	50	100	40	0	62	44	44	50	40	50	100	50	53	57	53	67	60	—