Game Recap
After a back-and-forth affair, the Columbus Blue Jackets pulled out a 3-2 win in overtime on Sunday. The expected goals told the same story: CBJ 9.64, UTA 6.18 at 5-on-5. CBJ outshot UTA 36-27.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Columbus Blue Jackets vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Jan 11, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CBJ3 - 2UTA (OT)
Jan 11, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| UTA | P1 | 22 | 22 | 50.0 | 12 | 19 | 38.7 | 7 | 11 | 38.9 | 19 | 12 | 61.3 | 7 | 3 | 70.0 | 3.89 | 3.95 | 49.7 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 28 | 42.9 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 8 | 14 | 36.4 | 13 | 24 | 35.1 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 1.40 | 5.90 | 19.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 23 | 19 | 54.8 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 11 | 14 | 44.0 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | 2.05 | 2.82 | 42.1 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| OT | 0 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 5 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 1.06 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 66 | 74 | 47.1 | 41 | 53 | 43.6 | 27 | 36 | 42.9 | 43 | 55 | 43.9 | 14 | 16 | 46.7 | 7.35 | 13.72 | 34.9 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | |
| CBJ | P1 | 22 | 22 | 50.0 | 19 | 12 | 61.3 | 11 | 7 | 61.1 | 12 | 19 | 38.7 | 3 | 7 | 30.0 | 3.95 | 3.89 | 50.3 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 28 | 21 | 57.1 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 14 | 8 | 63.6 | 24 | 13 | 64.9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 5.90 | 1.40 | 80.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 19 | 23 | 45.2 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 14 | 11 | 56.0 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | 2.82 | 2.05 | 57.9 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| OT | 5 | 0 | 100.0 | 4 | 0 | 100.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 5 | 0 | 100.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 74 | 66 | 52.9 | 53 | 41 | 56.4 | 36 | 27 | 57.1 | 55 | 43 | 56.1 | 16 | 14 | 53.3 | 13.72 | 7.35 | 65.1 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | |
Win Probability
UTA Favored
CBJ Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
UTA
CBJ
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CBJ Attempts
UTA Attempts
Individual Event Map
CBJ ShootUTA Shoot
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Hit Taken
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (CBJ) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = UTA players, Columns = CBJ players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| UTA ↓ / CBJ → | Coyle | Fantilli | Gaunce | Sillinger | Jenner | Johnson | Monahan | Voronkov | Pyyhtia | Heinen | Marchenko | Olivier | Werenski | Provorov | Severson | Fabbro | Zamula | Mateychuk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schmaltz | 50 | 47 | 70 | 61 | 82 | 60 | 67 | 40 | 60 | 33 | 50 | 64 | 62 | 47 | 77 | 60 | 63 | — |
| McBain | 64 | 80 | 14 | 80 | 50 | 33 | 38 | 70 | 17 | 17 | 89 | 78 | 64 | 50 | 56 | 63 | 55 | — |
| Stenlund | 20 | 33 | 14 | 33 | 56 | 35 | 50 | 25 | 20 | 33 | 29 | 22 | 24 | 33 | 40 | 80 | 40 | — |
| Hayton | 40 | 42 | 44 | 50 | 33 | 0 | 29 | 33 | 36 | 38 | 53 | 33 | 29 | 43 | 30 | 100 | 33 | — |
| Crouse | 33 | 36 | 67 | 50 | 78 | 31 | 71 | 50 | 71 | 50 | 38 | 56 | 46 | 36 | 79 | 54 | 58 | — |
| Carcone | 50 | 60 | 20 | 75 | 23 | 11 | 23 | 57 | 29 | 25 | 60 | 60 | 42 | 44 | 11 | 67 | 45 | — |
| But | 64 | 78 | 14 | 75 | 47 | 33 | 36 | 70 | 22 | 17 | 88 | 78 | 64 | 47 | 50 | 63 | 46 | — |
| Tanev | 20 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 71 | 71 | 67 | 14 | 0 | 17 | 100 | 14 | 33 | 67 | 36 | 75 | 33 | — |
| Keller | 50 | 57 | 70 | 65 | 83 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 60 | 33 | 63 | 69 | 63 | 60 | 76 | 63 | 75 | — |
| Guenther | 38 | 42 | 62 | 62 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 43 | 43 | 53 | 43 | 43 | 50 | 36 | 80 | 60 | — |
| Peterka | 42 | 50 | 73 | 65 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 45 | 57 | 50 | 40 | 91 | 56 | — |
| Yamamoto | 17 | 100 | 13 | — | 71 | 71 | 67 | 13 | 17 | 29 | 100 | 13 | 36 | 67 | 33 | 75 | 25 | — |
| Sergachev | 38 | 35 | 69 | 56 | 50 | 13 | 33 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 41 | 58 | 37 | 45 | 48 | 64 | 62 | — |
| Durzi | 70 | 43 | 71 | 48 | 56 | 17 | 36 | 60 | 56 | 67 | 48 | 73 | 57 | 39 | 48 | 68 | 61 | — |
| Cole | 30 | 47 | 20 | 67 | 57 | 32 | 45 | 36 | 25 | 33 | 47 | 36 | 33 | 45 | 42 | 73 | 47 | — |
| Schmidt | 33 | 80 | 14 | 80 | 67 | 67 | 63 | 36 | 18 | 17 | 78 | 33 | 53 | 45 | 38 | 67 | 32 | — |
| Marino | 43 | 78 | 20 | 100 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 40 | 18 | 20 | 89 | 36 | 55 | 45 | 53 | 75 | 31 | — |
| DeSimone | 50 | 100 | 40 | 0 | 62 | 44 | 44 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 53 | 57 | 53 | 67 | 60 | — |
