Game Recap
The Florida Panthers took down the Ottawa Senators 3-2 on Saturday. OTT had a big edge in high-danger chances, 8-3 over FLA at 5-on-5. The underlying numbers told a different story — OTT actually held the xG edge (5.01 to 3.11) at 5-on-5, but it didn't matter on the scoreboard. Michael Amadio generated the most offense at even strength with 1.06 ixG on 0 shots. Shots on goal: OTT 19, FLA 21.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Florida Panthers vs Ottawa Senators progressed on Jan 10, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
FLA3 - 2OTT
Jan 10, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| OTT | P1 | 11 | 20 | 35.5 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 5 | 8 | 38.5 | 6 | 18 | 25.0 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 1.78 | 2.19 | 44.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 17 | 54.1 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 7 | 8 | 46.7 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 4.24 | 1.81 | 70.1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 20 | 10 | 66.7 | 18 | 7 | 72.0 | 7 | 5 | 58.3 | 13 | 7 | 65.0 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | 4.08 | 0.86 | 82.6 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 51 | 47 | 52.0 | 44 | 32 | 57.9 | 19 | 21 | 47.5 | 29 | 39 | 42.6 | 12 | 8 | 60.0 | 10.10 | 4.86 | 67.5 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | |
| FLA | P1 | 20 | 11 | 64.5 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 8 | 5 | 61.5 | 18 | 6 | 75.0 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 2.19 | 1.78 | 55.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 20 | 45.9 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 8 | 7 | 53.3 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 1.81 | 4.24 | 29.9 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 10 | 20 | 33.3 | 7 | 18 | 28.0 | 5 | 7 | 41.7 | 7 | 13 | 35.0 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | 0.86 | 4.08 | 17.4 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 47 | 51 | 48.0 | 32 | 44 | 42.1 | 21 | 19 | 52.5 | 39 | 29 | 57.4 | 8 | 12 | 40.0 | 4.86 | 10.10 | 32.5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | |
Win Probability
OTT Favored
FLA Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
OTT
FLA
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
FLA Attempts
OTT Attempts
Individual Event Map
FLA ShootOTT Shoot
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (OTT) performed against every skater on the away team (FLA) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = OTT players, Columns = FLA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the OTT player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| OTT ↓ / FLA → | Lundell | Bennett | Reinhart | Verhaeghe | Luostarinen | Rodrigues | Kunin | Boqvist | Studnicka | Greer | Vilmanis | Samoskevich | Ekblad | Forsling | Mikkola | Balinskis | Petry | Sebrango |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stützle | 53 | 50 | 47 | 38 | 54 | 57 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 30 | 25 | 29 | 48 | 48 | 69 | 43 | 67 | 0 |
| Cozens | 83 | 73 | 100 | 63 | 50 | 85 | 75 | 67 | — | 64 | 100 | 75 | 63 | 75 | 77 | 73 | 90 | 100 |
| Pinto | 23 | 54 | 20 | 53 | 36 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 71 | 100 | — | 36 | 36 | 75 | 40 | 64 | 57 |
| Greig | 0 | 25 | 20 | 30 | 0 | 38 | 25 | 33 | 40 | 40 | 36 | 22 | 33 | 33 | 18 | 8 | 50 | 43 |
| Cousins | 25 | 50 | 40 | 43 | 100 | 33 | 40 | 50 | 40 | 50 | 30 | 25 | 43 | 50 | 22 | 22 | 50 | 38 |
| Eller | 0 | 75 | 33 | 70 | — | 60 | 40 | 50 | 40 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 33 | 40 | 33 | 69 | 64 |
| Tkachuk | 55 | 70 | 44 | 50 | 44 | 67 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 57 | 33 | 25 | 38 | 40 | 92 | 67 | 88 | 0 |
| Zetterlund | 30 | 50 | 25 | 67 | 43 | 60 | 100 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 71 | 57 | 31 | 33 | 63 | 50 | 67 | 33 |
| Perron | 33 | 50 | 25 | 56 | 50 | 71 | 75 | 50 | 67 | 44 | 100 | 75 | 38 | 38 | 54 | 50 | 83 | 100 |
| Batherson | 77 | 56 | 73 | 46 | 64 | 90 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 47 | 100 | 80 | 60 | 63 | 77 | 71 | 78 | 50 |
| Giroux | 43 | 47 | 37 | 47 | 60 | 63 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 43 | 50 | 33 | 58 | 58 | 60 | 40 | 57 | 25 |
| Amadio | 33 | 63 | 40 | 56 | 38 | 38 | — | 100 | 100 | 63 | 33 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 33 | 30 | 56 | 55 |
| Sanderson | 46 | 50 | 41 | 33 | 50 | 58 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 29 | 20 | 0 | 55 | 58 | 57 | 33 | 67 | 38 |
| Chabot | 38 | 47 | 38 | 50 | 56 | 55 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 50 | 38 | 44 | 50 | 36 | 67 | 60 |
| Spence | 50 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 60 | 67 | 63 | 57 | 86 | 60 | 50 | 57 | 57 | 73 | 67 | 70 | 50 |
| Zub | 25 | 67 | 27 | 50 | 33 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 40 | 14 | 10 | 56 | 55 |
| Jensen | 0 | 30 | 17 | 30 | 25 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 67 | 50 | 25 | 20 | 41 | 40 | 50 | 40 |
| Kleven | 13 | 40 | 22 | 40 | 0 | 67 | 57 | 50 | 25 | 86 | 75 | 71 | 25 | 25 | 77 | 50 | 70 | 40 |
