Game Recap
The Calgary Flames defeated the Pittsburgh Penguins 2-1 on January 10, 2026. Despite the result, the Pittsburgh Penguins held the edge in expected goals (7.04 to 4.41) at 5-on-5, indicating the Calgary Flames received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Pittsburgh Penguins created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 5 from the Calgary Flames at 5-on-5. Justin Brazeau was the most dangerous skater with 2.05 individual expected goals on 3 shots at 5-on-5. The Pittsburgh Penguins outshot the Calgary Flames 28-25 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Calgary Flames vs Pittsburgh Penguins progressed on Jan 10, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
CGY2 - 1PIT
Jan 10, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| PIT | P1 | 16 | 18 | 47.1 | 7 | 13 | 35.0 | 5 | 9 | 35.7 | 12 | 10 | 54.5 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | 1.28 | 2.09 | 38.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 22 | 15 | 59.5 | 19 | 9 | 67.9 | 11 | 6 | 64.7 | 18 | 7 | 72.0 | 4 | 0 | 100.0 | 5.06 | 1.00 | 83.5 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 21 | 19 | 52.5 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 12 | 10 | 54.5 | 17 | 15 | 53.1 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 2.99 | 2.70 | 52.6 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 59 | 52 | 53.2 | 39 | 35 | 52.7 | 28 | 25 | 52.8 | 47 | 32 | 59.5 | 14 | 5 | 73.7 | 9.34 | 5.79 | 61.7 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| CGY | P1 | 18 | 16 | 52.9 | 13 | 7 | 65.0 | 9 | 5 | 64.3 | 10 | 12 | 45.5 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 2.09 | 1.28 | 62.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 15 | 22 | 40.5 | 9 | 19 | 32.1 | 6 | 11 | 35.3 | 7 | 18 | 28.0 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 1.00 | 5.06 | 16.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 19 | 21 | 47.5 | 13 | 13 | 50.0 | 10 | 12 | 45.5 | 15 | 17 | 46.9 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 2.70 | 2.99 | 47.4 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 52 | 59 | 46.8 | 35 | 39 | 47.3 | 25 | 28 | 47.2 | 32 | 47 | 40.5 | 5 | 14 | 26.3 | 5.79 | 9.34 | 38.3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
Win Probability
PIT Favored
CGY Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
PIT
CGY
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
CGY Attempts
PIT Attempts
Individual Event Map
CGY ShootPIT Shoot
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PIT) performed against every skater on the away team (CGY) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = PIT players, Columns = CGY players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the PIT player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| PIT ↓ / CGY → | Backlund | Kadri | Sharangovich | Zary | Frost | Kirkland | Farabee | Huberdeau | Stromgren | Lomberg | Coronato | Klapka | Andersson | Weegar | Kuznetsov | Bahl | Hanley | Pachal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crosby | 55 | 60 | 50 | 10 | 67 | 63 | 79 | 40 | 60 | 67 | 56 | 0 | 70 | 38 | 35 | 67 | 60 | 0 |
| Malkin | 38 | 58 | 54 | 67 | 60 | 75 | 59 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 61 | 56 | 61 | 56 | 38 | 43 |
| Kindel | 27 | 47 | 40 | 67 | 60 | 75 | 50 | 36 | 50 | 60 | 25 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 38 | 43 |
| Novak | 44 | 60 | 58 | 20 | 67 | 50 | 40 | 33 | 67 | 75 | 50 | 0 | 60 | 40 | 45 | 60 | 50 | 50 |
| Dewar | 40 | 77 | 40 | 86 | 86 | 0 | 67 | 75 | 67 | 50 | 17 | 89 | 56 | 78 | 60 | 60 | 85 | 80 |
| Acciari | 29 | 73 | 0 | 71 | 83 | 0 | 67 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 13 | 88 | 43 | 63 | 25 | 60 | 67 | 64 |
| Lizotte | 50 | 55 | 25 | 86 | 86 | 0 | 44 | 58 | 67 | 50 | 0 | 88 | 60 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 83 | 80 |
| Rakell | 60 | 33 | 54 | 25 | 80 | 63 | 56 | 17 | 60 | 67 | 48 | 25 | 71 | 30 | 37 | 68 | 33 | 0 |
| Mantha | 67 | 71 | 75 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 57 | 60 | 67 | 83 | 80 | 50 | 75 | 38 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 83 |
| Chinakhov | 14 | 47 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 100 | 44 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 33 | 36 | 42 | 45 | 36 | 50 | 50 |
| Brazeau | 33 | 57 | 0 | 40 | 63 | 67 | 40 | 13 | 80 | 86 | 0 | 57 | 67 | 11 | 38 | 71 | 57 | 78 |
| Hayes | — | 50 | — | 50 | 60 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 80 | — | 60 | 67 | 20 | 33 | 75 | 40 | 80 |
| Letang | 43 | 64 | 33 | 20 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 42 | 86 | 80 | 39 | 50 | 65 | 38 | 47 | 56 | 46 | 45 |
| Karlsson | 50 | 55 | 63 | 83 | 83 | 78 | 56 | 42 | 57 | 67 | 44 | 60 | 63 | 50 | 60 | 62 | 67 | 80 |
| Wotherspoon | 35 | 47 | 46 | 88 | 88 | 100 | 50 | 45 | 71 | 75 | 25 | 67 | 61 | 41 | 38 | 61 | 62 | 67 |
| Kulak | 36 | 44 | 20 | 20 | 67 | 0 | 40 | 13 | 80 | 75 | 25 | 50 | 44 | 17 | 38 | 40 | 38 | 56 |
| Shea | — | 50 | 100 | 44 | 60 | 0 | 25 | 40 | 25 | 50 | 33 | 64 | 50 | 40 | 36 | 67 | 67 | 83 |
| St. Ivany | — | 40 | — | 50 | 64 | 0 | 25 | 40 | 25 | 60 | 33 | 64 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 67 | 71 | 88 |
