Calgary Flames vs Pittsburgh Penguins — January 10, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Calgary Flames held on for a tight 2-1 win over the Pittsburgh Penguins on January 10, 2026. The underlying numbers told a different story — PIT actually held the xG edge (7.04 to 4.41) at 5-on-5, but it didn't matter on the scoreboard. Shots on goal: PIT 28, CGY 25.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Calgary Flames vs Pittsburgh Penguins progressed on Jan 10, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

CGY2 - 1PIT

Jan 10, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
PIT	P1	16	18	47.1	7	13	35.0	5	9	35.7	12	10	54.5	5	2	71.4	1.28	2.09	38.0	0	1	0.0
	P2	22	15	59.5	19	9	67.9	11	6	64.7	18	7	72.0	4	0	100.0	5.06	1.00	83.5	1	0	100.0
	P3	21	19	52.5	13	13	50.0	12	10	54.5	17	15	53.1	5	3	62.5	2.99	2.70	52.6	0	1	0.0
	Total	59	52	53.2	39	35	52.7	28	25	52.8	47	32	59.5	14	5	73.7	9.34	5.79	61.7	1	2	33.3
CGY	P1	18	16	52.9	13	7	65.0	9	5	64.3	10	12	45.5	2	5	28.6	2.09	1.28	62.0	1	0	100.0
	P2	15	22	40.5	9	19	32.1	6	11	35.3	7	18	28.0	0	4	0.0	1.00	5.06	16.5	0	1	0.0
	P3	19	21	47.5	13	13	50.0	10	12	45.5	15	17	46.9	3	5	37.5	2.70	2.99	47.4	1	0	100.0
	Total	52	59	46.8	35	39	47.3	25	28	47.2	32	47	40.5	5	14	26.3	5.79	9.34	38.3	2	1	66.7

Win Probability

PIT Favored

CGY Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

PIT

CGY

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

CGY Attempts

PIT Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

CGY ShootPIT Shoot

Missed Shot

Hit

Hit Taken

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PIT) performed against every skater on the away team (CGY) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = PIT players, Columns = CGY players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the PIT player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

PIT ↓ / CGY →	Backlund	Kadri	Sharangovich	Zary	Frost	Kirkland	Farabee	Huberdeau	Stromgren	Lomberg	Coronato	Klapka	Andersson	Weegar	Kuznetsov	Bahl	Hanley	Pachal
Crosby	55	60	50	10	67	63	79	40	60	67	56	0	70	38	35	67	60	0
Malkin	38	58	54	67	60	75	59	40	50	60	50	50	61	56	61	56	38	43
Kindel	27	47	40	67	60	75	50	36	50	60	25	60	50	50	50	50	38	43
Novak	44	60	58	20	67	50	40	33	67	75	50	0	60	40	45	60	50	50
Dewar	40	77	40	86	86	0	67	75	67	50	17	89	56	78	60	60	85	80
Acciari	29	73	0	71	83	0	67	75	50	50	13	88	43	63	25	60	67	64
Lizotte	50	55	25	86	86	0	44	58	67	50	0	88	60	33	33	50	83	80
Rakell	60	33	54	25	80	63	56	17	60	67	48	25	71	30	37	68	33	0
Mantha	67	71	75	50	60	50	57	60	67	83	80	50	75	38	50	75	50	83
Chinakhov	14	47	0	50	33	100	44	40	50	50	25	33	36	42	45	36	50	50
Brazeau	33	57	0	40	63	67	40	13	80	86	0	57	67	11	38	71	57	78
Hayes	—	50	—	50	60	50	0	0	67	80	—	60	67	20	33	75	40	80
Letang	43	64	33	20	67	67	67	42	86	80	39	50	65	38	47	56	46	45
Karlsson	50	55	63	83	83	78	56	42	57	67	44	60	63	50	60	62	67	80
Wotherspoon	35	47	46	88	88	100	50	45	71	75	25	67	61	41	38	61	62	67
Kulak	36	44	20	20	67	0	40	13	80	75	25	50	44	17	38	40	38	56
Shea	—	50	100	44	60	0	25	40	25	50	33	64	50	40	36	67	67	83
St. Ivany	—	40	—	50	64	0	25	40	25	60	33	64	25	25	25	67	71	88