Game Recap
The Utah Mammoth defeated the St. Louis Blues 4-2 on January 9, 2026. Despite the result, the St. Louis Blues held the edge in expected goals (9.60 to 6.94) at 5-on-5, indicating the Utah Mammoth received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The St. Louis Blues created 13 high-danger scoring chances compared to 7 from the Utah Mammoth at 5-on-5. Nick Schmaltz scored 2 goals. Jimmy Snuggerud was the most dangerous skater with 1.55 individual expected goals on 4 shots at 5-on-5. The St. Louis Blues outshot the Utah Mammoth 28-23 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as St. Louis Blues vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Jan 9, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
STL2 - 4UTA
Jan 9, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| UTA | P1 | 17 | 24 | 41.5 | 12 | 21 | 36.4 | 6 | 13 | 31.6 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 5 | 6 | 45.5 | 4.20 | 5.40 | 43.8 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 27 | 18 | 60.0 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 9 | 6 | 60.0 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 2 | 3 | 40.0 | 1.42 | 1.29 | 52.3 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 18 | 23 | 43.9 | 15 | 17 | 46.9 | 8 | 9 | 47.1 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 4 | 7 | 36.4 | 3.39 | 4.10 | 45.3 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 62 | 65 | 48.8 | 43 | 49 | 46.7 | 23 | 28 | 45.1 | 38 | 45 | 45.8 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 9.01 | 10.79 | 45.5 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | |
| STL | P1 | 24 | 17 | 58.5 | 21 | 12 | 63.6 | 13 | 6 | 68.4 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 6 | 5 | 54.5 | 5.40 | 4.20 | 56.2 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 18 | 27 | 40.0 | 11 | 16 | 40.7 | 6 | 9 | 40.0 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 3 | 2 | 60.0 | 1.29 | 1.42 | 47.7 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 23 | 18 | 56.1 | 17 | 15 | 53.1 | 9 | 8 | 52.9 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 7 | 4 | 63.6 | 4.10 | 3.39 | 54.7 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 65 | 62 | 51.2 | 49 | 43 | 53.3 | 28 | 23 | 54.9 | 45 | 38 | 54.2 | 16 | 11 | 59.3 | 10.79 | 9.01 | 54.5 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
UTA Favored
STL Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
UTA
STL
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
STL Attempts
UTA Attempts
Individual Event Map
STL ShootUTA Shoot
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (STL) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = UTA players, Columns = STL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| UTA ↓ / STL → | Thomas | Schenn | Sundqvist | Stenberg | Neighbours | Buchnevich | Walker | Kyrou | Snuggerud | Toropchenko | Dvorsky | Berggren | Broberg | Fowler | Parayko | Faulk | Tucker | Mailloux |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schmaltz | 52 | 38 | 73 | 73 | 57 | 60 | 70 | 61 | 33 | 70 | 78 | 56 | 58 | 55 | 64 | 53 | 85 | 67 |
| McBain | 43 | 50 | 69 | 75 | 29 | 55 | 71 | 20 | 33 | 71 | 67 | 50 | 45 | 67 | 67 | 56 | 40 | 62 |
| Stenlund | 11 | 44 | 50 | 100 | 12 | 46 | 33 | 12 | 25 | — | 60 | 40 | 6 | 50 | 7 | 33 | 29 | 100 |
| Hayton | 50 | 50 | 0 | 78 | 50 | 44 | 25 | 50 | 41 | 0 | 75 | 100 | 50 | 55 | 46 | 56 | 43 | 50 |
| Kerfoot | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Crouse | 50 | 38 | 63 | 71 | 60 | 64 | 50 | 56 | 27 | 67 | 82 | 60 | 48 | 54 | 53 | 64 | 88 | 71 |
| But | 83 | 29 | 60 | 60 | 83 | 17 | 71 | 80 | 17 | 67 | 67 | 60 | 58 | 64 | 62 | 63 | 43 | 50 |
| Carcone | 83 | 71 | 65 | 67 | 83 | 75 | 71 | 80 | 75 | 67 | 71 | 67 | 80 | 74 | 82 | 56 | 43 | 69 |
| Tanev | 22 | 29 | 0 | 100 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 29 | 22 | — | 50 | 50 | 14 | 38 | 17 | 22 | 29 | 100 |
| Keller | 45 | 54 | 82 | 83 | 52 | 67 | 70 | 53 | 50 | 78 | 88 | 63 | 54 | 65 | 58 | 62 | 89 | 75 |
| Guenther | 7 | 39 | 57 | 71 | 15 | 40 | 40 | 8 | 33 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 36 | 39 | 30 | 50 | 57 | 40 |
| Peterka | 20 | 31 | 78 | 100 | 40 | 38 | 80 | 25 | 25 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 46 | 64 | 50 | 71 | 67 | 29 |
| Sergachev | 35 | 45 | 63 | 88 | 45 | 61 | 71 | 38 | 29 | 70 | 90 | 75 | 45 | 67 | 52 | 80 | 75 | 56 |
| Durzi | 43 | 39 | 47 | 60 | 52 | 48 | 50 | 50 | 36 | 50 | 83 | 60 | 45 | 57 | 43 | 50 | 56 | 44 |
| Marino | 22 | 44 | 57 | 80 | 24 | 42 | 60 | 21 | 33 | 50 | 71 | 63 | 27 | 46 | 55 | 35 | 43 | 57 |
| Schmidt | 37 | 50 | 75 | 80 | 33 | 50 | 67 | 31 | 28 | 50 | 71 | 63 | 36 | 44 | 62 | 45 | 62 | 50 |
| Cole | 43 | 50 | 60 | 25 | 43 | 54 | 54 | 43 | 36 | 78 | 57 | 33 | 40 | 67 | 33 | 50 | 33 | 80 |
| DeSimone | 43 | 17 | 77 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 71 | 50 | 17 | 80 | 75 | 50 | 33 | 91 | 50 | 43 | 43 | 86 |
