Game Recap
The Washington Capitals ran away with it, beating the Chicago Blackhawks 5-1 on January 9, 2026. McMichael was the most dangerous skater at 5-on-5, racking up 1.23 individual expected goals on 2 shots. Dig into the 5-on-5 data, and CHI had the better of it (5.53 xG to 4.58). Sometimes the bounces just don't go your way. Shots on goal were even at 24 apiece.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Washington Capitals vs Chicago Blackhawks progressed on Jan 9, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
WSH5 - 1CHI
Jan 9, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| CHI | P1 | 21 | 13 | 61.8 | 16 | 9 | 64.0 | 10 | 6 | 62.5 | 13 | 9 | 59.1 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 4.37 | 1.61 | 73.1 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 12 | 17 | 41.4 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 6 | 10 | 37.5 | 5 | 11 | 31.3 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 2.67 | 3.23 | 45.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 9 | 8 | 52.9 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 2.46 | 1.57 | 61.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 50 | 43 | 53.8 | 41 | 36 | 53.2 | 24 | 24 | 50.0 | 27 | 28 | 49.1 | 12 | 8 | 60.0 | 9.50 | 6.42 | 59.7 | 1 | 5 | 16.7 | |
| WSH | P1 | 13 | 21 | 38.2 | 9 | 16 | 36.0 | 6 | 10 | 37.5 | 9 | 13 | 40.9 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 1.61 | 4.37 | 26.9 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 12 | 58.6 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 10 | 6 | 62.5 | 11 | 5 | 68.8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 3.23 | 2.67 | 54.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 8 | 9 | 47.1 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 1.57 | 2.46 | 39.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 43 | 50 | 46.2 | 36 | 41 | 46.8 | 24 | 24 | 50.0 | 28 | 27 | 50.9 | 8 | 12 | 40.0 | 6.42 | 9.50 | 40.3 | 5 | 1 | 83.3 | |
Win Probability
CHI Favored
WSH Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
CHI
WSH
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
WSH Attempts
CHI Attempts
Individual Event Map
WSH ShootCHI Shoot
Goal
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CHI) performed against every skater on the away team (WSH) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = CHI players, Columns = WSH players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the CHI player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| CHI ↓ / WSH → | Dowd | Strome | Sourdif | Lapierre | McMichael | Protas | Duhaime | Ovechkin | Beauvillier | Frank | Leonard | Leason | Carlson | Chisholm | Chychrun | Sandin | Roy | Fehérváry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teravainen | 57 | 67 | 60 | 50 | 57 | 77 | 67 | 57 | 71 | 50 | 43 | 50 | 58 | 50 | 73 | 67 | 78 | — |
| Bedard | 47 | 0 | 40 | 33 | 60 | 88 | 25 | 0 | 43 | 33 | 25 | 33 | 67 | 13 | 0 | 56 | 64 | — |
| Greene | 44 | 57 | 13 | 0 | 30 | 20 | — | 29 | 44 | 38 | 36 | 0 | 63 | 38 | 31 | 38 | 13 | — |
| Moore | 40 | 75 | 0 | 43 | 29 | 40 | 38 | 75 | 25 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 30 | 44 | 57 | 57 | 33 | — |
| Dach | 58 | 80 | 50 | 25 | 33 | 50 | 40 | 100 | 69 | 62 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 85 | 67 | 71 | 67 | — |
| Dickinson | 50 | 53 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 33 | 25 | 50 | 33 | 83 | 60 | 0 | 40 | 50 | 64 | 50 | 100 | — |
| Donato | 100 | 62 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 25 | 33 | 56 | 100 | 86 | 80 | 0 | 50 | 73 | 75 | 63 | 75 | — |
| Foligno | 57 | 100 | 57 | 25 | 50 | 25 | 40 | 100 | 60 | 67 | 25 | 25 | 56 | 82 | 86 | 60 | 40 | — |
| Burakovsky | 42 | 0 | 33 | — | 38 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 30 | 29 | — | 73 | 0 | 11 | 57 | 56 | — |
| Slaggert | 55 | 50 | 57 | 25 | 33 | 33 | 50 | 33 | 64 | 67 | 17 | 25 | 47 | 82 | 63 | 50 | 67 | — |
| Bertuzzi | 67 | 44 | 38 | 0 | 50 | 62 | 33 | 38 | 67 | 67 | 20 | 0 | 60 | 56 | 44 | 67 | 63 | — |
| Lardis | 50 | 75 | 0 | 50 | 29 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 33 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 30 | 67 | 57 | 67 | 33 | — |
| Levshunov | 41 | 0 | 43 | 60 | 40 | 64 | 43 | 0 | 45 | 47 | 22 | 43 | 50 | 25 | 64 | 50 | 65 | — |
| Kaiser | 27 | 50 | 36 | 75 | 14 | 0 | 50 | 40 | 42 | 47 | 22 | 50 | 36 | 44 | 67 | 29 | 50 | — |
| Murphy | 80 | 60 | 67 | 25 | 75 | 56 | 50 | 50 | 83 | 83 | 50 | 25 | 57 | 77 | 46 | 69 | 60 | — |
| Vlasic | 80 | 58 | 67 | 20 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 47 | 82 | 83 | 50 | 20 | 57 | 73 | 46 | 67 | 60 | — |
| Grzelcyk | 40 | 67 | 20 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 25 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 43 | 25 | 40 | 25 | 20 | — |
| Korchinski | 33 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 36 | 17 | 0 | 44 | 14 | 13 | 0 | 17 | — |
