Edmonton Oilers vs Winnipeg Jets — January 8, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Edmonton Oilers came away with a 4-3 victory over the Winnipeg Jets on January 8, 2026. High-danger chances favored EDM by a wide margin: 10 to 4. EDM had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 9.00 xG against 5.74 while holding 59.5% of shot attempts. EDM outshot WPG 30-16.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Edmonton Oilers vs Winnipeg Jets progressed on Jan 8, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

EDM4 - 3WPG

Jan 8, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
WPG	P1	22	11	66.7	17	10	63.0	11	7	61.1	14	9	60.9	4	2	66.7	3.56	2.90	55.1	3	1	75.0
	P2	11	23	32.4	10	17	37.0	3	12	20.0	7	15	31.8	1	7	12.5	1.49	4.93	23.2	0	1	0.0
	P3	7	18	28.0	4	15	21.1	2	11	15.4	5	12	29.4	2	2	50.0	1.00	2.21	31.2	0	2	0.0
	Total	40	52	43.5	31	42	42.5	16	30	34.8	26	36	41.9	7	11	38.9	6.05	10.04	37.6	3	4	42.9
EDM	P1	11	22	33.3	10	17	37.0	7	11	38.9	9	14	39.1	2	4	33.3	2.90	3.56	44.9	1	3	25.0
	P2	23	11	67.6	17	10	63.0	12	3	80.0	15	7	68.2	7	1	87.5	4.93	1.49	76.8	1	0	100.0
	P3	18	7	72.0	15	4	78.9	11	2	84.6	12	5	70.6	2	2	50.0	2.21	1.00	68.8	2	0	100.0
	Total	52	40	56.5	42	31	57.5	30	16	65.2	36	26	58.1	11	7	61.1	10.04	6.05	62.4	4	3	57.1

Win Probability

WPG Favored

EDM Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

WPG

EDM

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

EDM Attempts

WPG Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

EDM ShootWPG Shoot

Missed Shot

Attempt Blocked

Hit

Takeaway

Giveaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (WPG) performed against every skater on the away team (EDM) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = WPG players, Columns = EDM players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the WPG player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

WPG ↓ / EDM →	McDavid	Draisaitl	Nugent-Hopkins	Roslovic	Janmark	Savoie	Lazar	Frederic	Hyman	Howard	Podkolzin	Kapanen	Bouchard	Ekholm	Stastney	Nurse	Emberson	Stillman
Toews	70	44	63	46	69	55	80	50	50	55	40	40	79	67	46	53	64	64
Vilardi	60	44	50	46	62	55	75	43	40	55	40	40	71	50	42	53	60	64
Scheifele	54	64	55	33	75	67	67	100	33	33	70	70	55	47	71	80	60	60
Barron	11	43	21	20	0	20	0	—	17	25	67	73	33	36	22	14	50	40
Lowry	9	29	22	17	0	20	50	—	18	25	44	50	17	18	27	22	50	40
Perfetti	25	38	25	50	56	60	75	50	25	56	40	40	57	0	45	33	67	64
Zhilkin	0	—	33	50	100	50	100	100	33	50	—	—	33	0	100	100	33	33
Connor	44	27	40	67	63	100	50	0	30	100	50	50	47	44	63	73	50	50
Iafallo	38	33	44	38	33	100	0	0	30	40	43	43	22	14	56	50	60	50
Pearson	0	100	25	50	100	43	100	100	40	43	100	—	33	20	86	83	60	50
Koepke	0	0	25	29	100	40	100	100	14	25	—	—	13	0	100	100	50	50
Niederreiter	11	42	23	33	33	33	0	—	13	25	64	73	32	33	30	14	57	40
Samberg	18	26	33	67	33	67	50	50	19	100	44	56	26	25	44	33	71	50
Morrissey	38	56	33	27	54	38	67	40	30	38	64	62	62	53	44	53	25	40
Pionk	9	28	22	60	44	75	67	40	14	67	60	60	15	6	58	55	43	50
DeMelo	31	48	40	18	25	33	50	50	33	25	56	59	45	56	36	33	50	43
Stanley	14	0	29	47	83	54	83	80	20	40	—	—	18	0	63	57	75	70
Schenn	25	50	38	42	80	42	83	80	38	42	0	0	22	0	56	50	70	67