Game Recap
The Utah Mammoth defeated the Ottawa Senators 3-1 on January 7, 2026. The Utah Mammoth controlled play with 48.2% Corsi and generated 5.59 expected goals compared to 4.06 from the Ottawa Senators at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Ottawa Senators created 6 high-danger scoring chances compared to 5 from the Utah Mammoth at 5-on-5. Ridly Greig was the most dangerous skater with 1.48 individual expected goals on 4 shots at 5-on-5. The Ottawa Senators outshot the Utah Mammoth 33-21 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Ottawa Senators vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Jan 7, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
OTT1 - 3UTA
Jan 7, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| UTA | P1 | 18 | 20 | 47.4 | 13 | 11 | 54.2 | 9 | 7 | 56.3 | 10 | 17 | 37.0 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 1.94 | 2.54 | 43.3 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 |
| P2 | 12 | 28 | 30.0 | 8 | 22 | 26.7 | 5 | 14 | 26.3 | 9 | 19 | 32.1 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 2.19 | 4.68 | 31.9 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 18 | 23 | 43.9 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 7 | 12 | 36.8 | 13 | 12 | 52.0 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 3.21 | 2.06 | 60.9 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 48 | 71 | 40.3 | 34 | 49 | 41.0 | 21 | 33 | 38.9 | 32 | 48 | 40.0 | 8 | 12 | 40.0 | 7.34 | 9.28 | 44.2 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | |
| OTT | P1 | 20 | 18 | 52.6 | 11 | 13 | 45.8 | 7 | 9 | 43.8 | 17 | 10 | 63.0 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 2.54 | 1.94 | 56.7 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 |
| P2 | 28 | 12 | 70.0 | 22 | 8 | 73.3 | 14 | 5 | 73.7 | 19 | 9 | 67.9 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 4.68 | 2.19 | 68.1 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 23 | 18 | 56.1 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 12 | 7 | 63.2 | 12 | 13 | 48.0 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 2.06 | 3.21 | 39.1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 71 | 48 | 59.7 | 49 | 34 | 59.0 | 33 | 21 | 61.1 | 48 | 32 | 60.0 | 12 | 8 | 60.0 | 9.28 | 7.34 | 55.8 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | |
Win Probability
UTA Favored
OTT Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
UTA
OTT
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
OTT Attempts
UTA Attempts
Individual Event Map
OTT ShootUTA Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (OTT) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = UTA players, Columns = OTT players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| UTA ↓ / OTT → | Pinto | Stützle | Greig | Cozens | Cousins | Halliday | Tkachuk | Zetterlund | Perron | Batherson | Giroux | Amadio | Sanderson | Chabot | Zub | Jensen | Spence | Kleven |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schmaltz | 81 | 17 | 62 | 20 | 100 | 0 | 67 | 78 | 0 | 21 | 44 | 71 | 45 | 53 | 61 | 67 | 50 | 75 |
| Kerfoot | 25 | 0 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 20 | 67 | 57 | 9 | 21 | 27 | 24 | 23 | 33 | 36 | 50 | 50 |
| McBain | 58 | 46 | 14 | 0 | 67 | 17 | 61 | 81 | 33 | 17 | 18 | 13 | 33 | 44 | 25 | 67 | 55 | 64 |
| Hayton | 67 | 27 | 33 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 42 | 33 | 40 | 55 | 40 | 33 | 50 | 60 | 50 |
| Crouse | 91 | 13 | 55 | 28 | 100 | 0 | 60 | 80 | 67 | 18 | 45 | 56 | 41 | 47 | 64 | 62 | 60 | 67 |
| But | 65 | 50 | 25 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 72 | 75 | 33 | — | 38 | 14 | 38 | 60 | 30 | 73 | 50 | 57 |
| Tanev | 63 | 20 | 22 | 0 | 40 | 50 | 67 | 83 | 50 | 0 | 18 | 14 | 30 | 55 | 40 | 64 | 25 | 50 |
| Carcone | 50 | 50 | 25 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 62 | 70 | 25 | — | 29 | 14 | 17 | 44 | 14 | 50 | 56 | 62 |
| Keller | 83 | 25 | 53 | 31 | 100 | — | 90 | 82 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 70 | 55 | 50 | 60 | 60 | 50 | 83 |
| Guenther | 82 | 33 | 46 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 33 | 33 | 36 | 40 | 62 | 40 | 54 | 44 | 50 | 43 |
| Peterka | 88 | 20 | 60 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 100 | 0 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 56 |
| Yamamoto | 25 | 17 | 18 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 40 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 8 | 14 | 18 | 33 | 20 | 43 | 33 | 100 |
| Sergachev | 73 | 32 | 47 | 23 | 100 | — | 67 | 92 | 100 | 30 | 43 | 58 | 48 | 52 | 74 | 61 | 44 | 67 |
| Durzi | 77 | 50 | 31 | 38 | 100 | 100 | 95 | 88 | 67 | 54 | 33 | 36 | 68 | 40 | 79 | 47 | 58 | 69 |
| Marino | 64 | 15 | 71 | 33 | 50 | 20 | 82 | 75 | 44 | 9 | 42 | 57 | 50 | 48 | 33 | 58 | 67 | 50 |
| Schmidt | 56 | 12 | 44 | 17 | 50 | 33 | 56 | 88 | 29 | 7 | 33 | 44 | 9 | 50 | 20 | 65 | 50 | 67 |
| Cole | 60 | 6 | 8 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 63 | 22 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 40 | 44 | 50 |
| DeSimone | 25 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 40 | 40 | 33 | 33 | 43 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 14 | 9 | 43 | 20 | 40 |
