Game Recap
Connor McDavid poured in 3 goals to lead the Edmonton Oilers past the Nashville Predators 6-2 on January 6, 2026. Matt Savoie generated the most offense at even strength with 2.03 ixG on 4 shots. At 5-on-5, EDM carried the play with 11.03 expected goals and a 52.9% share of shot attempts. EDM had a commanding 43-26 edge in shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Nashville Predators vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Jan 6, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
NSH2 - 6EDM
Jan 6, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| EDM | P1 | 18 | 23 | 43.9 | 15 | 15 | 50.0 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 10 | 20 | 33.3 | 4 | 7 | 36.4 | 3.31 | 4.16 | 44.3 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 29 | 12 | 70.7 | 23 | 7 | 76.7 | 16 | 7 | 69.6 | 23 | 8 | 74.2 | 10 | 3 | 76.9 | 6.55 | 0.89 | 88.1 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 28 | 25 | 52.8 | 20 | 19 | 51.3 | 15 | 10 | 60.0 | 23 | 15 | 60.5 | 6 | 1 | 85.7 | 5.24 | 2.60 | 66.9 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 75 | 60 | 55.6 | 58 | 41 | 58.6 | 43 | 26 | 62.3 | 56 | 43 | 56.6 | 20 | 11 | 64.5 | 15.10 | 7.64 | 66.4 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | |
| NSH | P1 | 23 | 18 | 56.1 | 15 | 15 | 50.0 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 20 | 10 | 66.7 | 7 | 4 | 63.6 | 4.16 | 3.31 | 55.7 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 12 | 29 | 29.3 | 7 | 23 | 23.3 | 7 | 16 | 30.4 | 8 | 23 | 25.8 | 3 | 10 | 23.1 | 0.89 | 6.55 | 11.9 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 25 | 28 | 47.2 | 19 | 20 | 48.7 | 10 | 15 | 40.0 | 15 | 23 | 39.5 | 1 | 6 | 14.3 | 2.60 | 5.24 | 33.1 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | |
| Total | 60 | 75 | 44.4 | 41 | 58 | 41.4 | 26 | 43 | 37.7 | 43 | 56 | 43.4 | 11 | 20 | 35.5 | 7.64 | 15.10 | 33.6 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | |
Win Probability
EDM Favored
NSH Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
EDM
NSH
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
NSH Attempts
EDM Attempts
Individual Event Map
NSH ShootEDM Shoot
Shot Blocked
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (NSH) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = EDM players, Columns = NSH players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| EDM ↓ / NSH → | O'Reilly | McCarron | Stamkos | Jost | Svechkov | Forsberg | Bunting | Schaefer | Haula | Evangelista | Smith | Hague | Josi | Perbix | Blankenburg | Skjei | Wilsby | Barron |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDavid | 69 | 68 | 89 | 67 | 56 | 75 | 40 | 47 | 56 | 27 | 56 | 78 | 56 | 55 | 71 | 64 | 80 | 100 |
| Draisaitl | 67 | 37 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 36 | 27 | 64 | 56 | 46 | 44 | 55 | 71 | 33 | 53 | 60 | 57 |
| Nugent-Hopkins | 71 | 68 | 94 | 71 | 57 | 75 | 33 | 47 | 57 | 27 | 56 | 82 | 55 | 55 | 82 | 67 | 80 | 100 |
| Roslovic | 50 | 86 | 75 | 43 | 46 | 60 | 57 | 57 | 59 | 31 | 75 | 67 | 57 | 56 | 69 | 53 | 43 | 50 |
| Savoie | 40 | 88 | 75 | 67 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 60 | 36 | 88 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 64 | 90 | 70 | 67 |
| Janmark | 67 | 100 | 73 | 80 | 75 | 43 | 75 | 100 | 83 | 71 | 100 | 100 | 88 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 82 | 63 |
| Lazar | 50 | 100 | 71 | 75 | 75 | 40 | 83 | 100 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 82 | 57 |
| Henrique | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hyman | 80 | 68 | 93 | 71 | 71 | 88 | 67 | 44 | 71 | 29 | 58 | 81 | 57 | 59 | 90 | 89 | 100 | 100 |
| Howard | 100 | 75 | 86 | 43 | 42 | 71 | 53 | 25 | 58 | 27 | 100 | 65 | 50 | 63 | 67 | 45 | 25 | 50 |
| Podkolzin | 58 | 25 | 67 | 55 | 67 | 55 | 44 | 27 | 71 | 63 | 35 | 38 | 58 | 64 | 29 | 55 | 55 | 57 |
| Kapanen | 58 | 20 | 71 | 44 | 50 | 55 | 50 | 27 | 75 | 56 | 31 | 43 | 44 | 63 | 33 | 45 | 50 | 63 |
| Bouchard | 68 | 67 | 86 | 55 | 55 | 68 | 75 | 50 | 75 | 53 | 56 | 71 | 56 | 61 | 74 | 67 | 80 | 71 |
| Nurse | 63 | 40 | 86 | 52 | 47 | 65 | 41 | 24 | 50 | 50 | 37 | 57 | 63 | 62 | 39 | 41 | 38 | 67 |
| Ekholm | 69 | 92 | 82 | 54 | 55 | 77 | 67 | 71 | 64 | 50 | 70 | 65 | 65 | 71 | 67 | 82 | 89 | 71 |
| Regula | 64 | 26 | 89 | 40 | 38 | 65 | 33 | 17 | 43 | 23 | 19 | 52 | 44 | 33 | 42 | 23 | 17 | 80 |
| Stastney | 60 | 70 | 75 | 86 | 86 | 43 | 46 | 70 | 60 | 50 | 78 | 33 | 62 | 60 | 25 | 80 | 81 | 43 |
| Emberson | 67 | 70 | 75 | 67 | 67 | 50 | 45 | 73 | 63 | 25 | 88 | 57 | 50 | 33 | 67 | 75 | 75 | 43 |
