Utah Mammoth vs New Jersey Devils — January 3, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The New Jersey Devils defeated the Utah Mammoth 4-1 on January 3, 2026. Despite the result, the Utah Mammoth held the edge in expected goals (10.15 to 5.43) at 5-on-5, indicating the New Jersey Devils received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Utah Mammoth created 9 high-danger scoring chances compared to 8 from the New Jersey Devils at 5-on-5. Clayton Keller was the most dangerous skater with 2.22 individual expected goals on 4 shots at 5-on-5. The Utah Mammoth outshot the New Jersey Devils 31-30 in total shots on goal.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs New Jersey Devils progressed on Jan 3, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA1 - 4NJD

Jan 3, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
NJD	P1	17	22	43.6	15	18	45.5	9	12	42.9	12	16	42.9	4	3	57.1	3.19	4.65	40.7	2	0	100.0
	P2	18	16	52.9	15	12	55.6	12	5	70.6	12	9	57.1	7	1	87.5	4.73	2.23	68.0	2	0	100.0
	P3	14	24	36.8	10	18	35.7	9	14	39.1	9	16	36.0	3	6	33.3	2.32	4.59	33.6	0	1	0.0
	Total	49	62	44.1	40	48	45.5	30	31	49.2	33	41	44.6	14	10	58.3	10.25	11.47	47.2	4	1	80.0
UTA	P1	22	17	56.4	18	15	54.5	12	9	57.1	16	12	57.1	3	4	42.9	4.65	3.19	59.3	0	2	0.0
	P2	16	18	47.1	12	15	44.4	5	12	29.4	9	12	42.9	1	7	12.5	2.23	4.73	32.0	0	2	0.0
	P3	24	14	63.2	18	10	64.3	14	9	60.9	16	9	64.0	6	3	66.7	4.59	2.32	66.4	1	0	100.0
	Total	62	49	55.9	48	40	54.5	31	30	50.8	41	33	55.4	10	14	41.7	11.47	10.25	52.8	1	4	20.0

Win Probability

NJD Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

NJD

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

NJD Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootNJD Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Hit Taken

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NJD) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = NJD players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the NJD player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

NJD ↓ / UTA →	Schmaltz	Stenlund	Hayton	Kerfoot	McBain	O'Brien	Crouse	But	Carcone	Keller	Guenther	Peterka	Sergachev	Schmidt	Durzi	Marino	Cole	DeSimone
Hischier	36	63	75	67	100	63	50	50	—	36	48	22	45	80	44	88	72	63
Hughes	50	63	67	67	100	63	50	33	—	46	53	57	53	75	44	73	72	63
Mercer	26	75	100	78	63	75	86	83	80	26	15	44	39	65	36	63	50	50
Glass	25	20	56	29	0	0	83	33	0	17	67	67	33	50	25	40	50	43
Glendening	40	67	100	43	18	67	50	25	14	40	33	50	29	67	33	67	33	33
Bratt	50	60	50	60	100	56	38	17	0	50	59	40	56	80	35	88	68	56
Palat	38	25	56	0	0	0	43	33	0	33	80	57	0	60	22	63	50	38
Lammikko	0	67	50	33	10	67	33	17	14	0	40	—	22	50	22	100	25	29
Meier	32	82	75	70	73	60	75	71	67	32	22	58	50	68	38	67	69	50
Gritsyuk	37	75	75	71	71	75	67	71	67	37	13	62	42	71	33	73	43	43
Brown	30	33	83	0	—	0	100	67	0	25	50	56	0	56	43	44	100	43
Noesen	0	50	40	40	23	50	33	14	11	0	40	—	38	33	20	100	36	25
Hamilton	30	55	38	40	50	43	47	33	40	26	29	57	20	81	15	75	64	46
Siegenthaler	33	33	45	25	50	38	38	40	36	32	23	60	13	71	13	79	44	42
Pesce	40	50	90	56	0	50	67	43	0	40	55	45	53	61	54	58	45	42
Hughes	55	67	100	56	38	60	60	25	0	55	64	60	69	46	64	57	67	40
Dillon	14	50	56	50	67	75	56	56	50	12	25	33	38	64	38	60	22	33
White	14	60	80	67	71	100	70	75	67	13	50	20	67	57	56	50	40	57