Minnesota Wild vs Anaheim Ducks — January 2, 2026 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Minnesota Wild took down the Anaheim Ducks 5-2 on Friday. Yurov put up 2 goals. Keep an eye on Sennecke — 1.99 individual xG on 3 shots at 5-on-5. High-danger chances favored MIN by a wide margin: 13 to 8. At 5-on-5, MIN carried the play with 9.88 expected goals and a 52.9% share of shot attempts. Shots on goal: ANA 28, MIN 34.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Minnesota Wild vs Anaheim Ducks progressed on Jan 2, 2026
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

MIN5 - 2ANA

Jan 2, 2026 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
ANA	P1	22	21	51.2	14	14	50.0	10	7	58.8	15	16	48.4	1	7	12.5	1.60	3.17	33.6	0	1	0.0
	P2	21	40	34.4	16	31	34.0	10	19	34.5	18	28	39.1	6	8	42.9	4.79	7.09	40.3	1	2	33.3
	P3	24	23	51.1	19	17	52.8	8	8	50.0	15	14	51.7	5	3	62.5	4.20	3.67	53.4	1	2	33.3
	Total	67	84	44.4	49	62	44.1	28	34	45.2	48	58	45.3	12	18	40.0	10.59	13.93	43.2	2	5	28.6
MIN	P1	21	22	48.8	14	14	50.0	7	10	41.2	16	15	51.6	7	1	87.5	3.17	1.60	66.4	1	0	100.0
	P2	40	21	65.6	31	16	66.0	19	10	65.5	28	18	60.9	8	6	57.1	7.09	4.79	59.7	2	1	66.7
	P3	23	24	48.9	17	19	47.2	8	8	50.0	14	15	48.3	3	5	37.5	3.67	4.20	46.6	2	1	66.7
	Total	84	67	55.6	62	49	55.9	34	28	54.8	58	48	54.7	18	12	60.0	13.93	10.59	56.8	5	2	71.4

Win Probability

ANA Favored

MIN Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

ANA

MIN

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

MIN Attempts

ANA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

MIN ShootANA Shoot

Hit

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (ANA) performed against every skater on the away team (MIN) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = ANA players, Columns = MIN players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the ANA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

ANA ↓ / MIN →	Eriksson Ek	Sturm	Trenin	Hinostroza	Kaprizov	Boldy	Johansson	Foligno	Zuccarello	Hartman	Yurov	Tarasenko	Hughes	Faber	Brodin	Spurgeon	Middleton	Bogosian
Granlund	40	57	25	50	33	29	50	58	28	33	43	44	24	63	70	56	22	14
McTavish	50	61	36	50	78	50	50	53	71	50	67	50	47	54	74	78	50	29
Carlsson	30	53	33	53	63	42	25	56	40	65	20	42	37	54	54	50	36	22
Nesterenko	60	27	27	0	48	50	100	13	39	0	43	0	35	40	33	33	33	43
Poehling	29	0	17	50	35	36	64	20	31	60	83	50	14	50	44	50	60	61
Harkins	43	0	20	50	71	45	60	25	67	58	80	43	25	50	50	50	58	60
Kreider	47	38	40	60	31	35	33	38	18	21	100	43	32	38	63	70	60	43
Gauthier	50	56	38	50	70	47	19	40	63	54	20	39	41	42	41	52	64	29
Killorn	28	0	0	50	33	19	25	0	27	43	50	43	29	38	50	60	0	0
Johnston	43	0	20	50	75	50	56	25	75	63	100	50	0	50	67	67	54	54
Sennecke	50	63	40	50	69	46	54	57	60	57	63	67	50	56	74	89	50	40
Terry	100	23	15	33	53	100	38	9	47	43	32	18	41	53	13	33	54	29
LaCombe	31	44	14	60	43	29	50	41	39	45	82	56	31	58	73	82	43	33
Trouba	38	23	15	43	43	34	53	17	39	35	82	33	24	43	65	86	56	36
Mintyukov	53	0	25	50	18	55	37	40	10	53	23	40	38	31	28	40	63	60
Moore	54	0	22	57	33	53	38	33	27	67	21	50	50	47	33	39	46	50
Gudas	29	43	43	38	45	25	29	27	14	20	40	22	29	31	46	43	14	33
Zellweger	50	40	43	33	58	0	0	27	38	25	33	25	27	27	53	53	0	17