Game Recap
The Ottawa Senators defeated the Washington Capitals 4-3 on January 1, 2026. At 5-on-5, OTT carried the play with 7.46 expected goals and a 54.9% share of shot attempts. Shots on goal: OTT 32, WSH 29.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Washington Capitals vs Ottawa Senators progressed on Jan 1, 2026
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
WSH3 - 4OTT
Jan 1, 2026 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| OTT | P1 | 15 | 21 | 41.7 | 7 | 19 | 26.9 | 6 | 16 | 27.3 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | 0.68 | 4.56 | 13.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 24 | 18 | 57.1 | 20 | 10 | 66.7 | 15 | 7 | 68.2 | 18 | 12 | 60.0 | 6 | 1 | 85.7 | 5.72 | 0.86 | 86.9 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 28 | 14 | 66.7 | 17 | 10 | 63.0 | 11 | 6 | 64.7 | 21 | 7 | 75.0 | 7 | 1 | 87.5 | 2.80 | 1.81 | 60.8 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| Total | 67 | 53 | 55.8 | 44 | 39 | 53.0 | 32 | 29 | 52.5 | 52 | 34 | 60.5 | 15 | 9 | 62.5 | 9.21 | 7.22 | 56.0 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | |
| WSH | P1 | 21 | 15 | 58.3 | 19 | 7 | 73.1 | 16 | 6 | 72.7 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | 4.56 | 0.68 | 87.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 18 | 24 | 42.9 | 10 | 20 | 33.3 | 7 | 15 | 31.8 | 12 | 18 | 40.0 | 1 | 6 | 14.3 | 0.86 | 5.72 | 13.1 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 14 | 28 | 33.3 | 10 | 17 | 37.0 | 6 | 11 | 35.3 | 7 | 21 | 25.0 | 1 | 7 | 12.5 | 1.81 | 2.80 | 39.2 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| Total | 53 | 67 | 44.2 | 39 | 44 | 47.0 | 29 | 32 | 47.5 | 34 | 52 | 39.5 | 9 | 15 | 37.5 | 7.22 | 9.21 | 44.0 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | |
Win Probability
OTT Favored
WSH Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
OTT
WSH
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
WSH Attempts
OTT Attempts
Individual Event Map
WSH ShootOTT Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (OTT) performed against every skater on the away team (WSH) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = OTT players, Columns = WSH players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the OTT player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| OTT ↓ / WSH → | Strome | Dowd | Sourdif | Lapierre | McMichael | Protas | Ovechkin | Duhaime | Wilson | Beauvillier | Leonard | Frank | Chychrun | Carlson | Roy | Sandin | Fehérváry | van Riemsdyk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stützle | 44 | 80 | 63 | 40 | 59 | 67 | 27 | 40 | 62 | 55 | 45 | 63 | 44 | 77 | 62 | 86 | 89 | 67 |
| Pinto | 55 | 64 | 60 | 100 | 73 | 60 | 53 | 67 | 57 | 33 | 67 | 0 | 47 | 53 | 75 | 67 | 81 | 78 |
| Greig | 56 | 40 | 50 | 20 | 71 | 48 | 43 | 20 | 44 | 60 | 67 | 14 | 55 | 38 | 100 | 38 | 50 | 45 |
| Cozens | 50 | 53 | 57 | 33 | 63 | 29 | 50 | 25 | 71 | 27 | 50 | 25 | 56 | 64 | 50 | 33 | 64 | 50 |
| Halliday | 0 | 78 | 100 | 43 | 90 | 75 | 0 | 60 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 67 | 67 | 82 | 100 | 77 | 64 | 40 |
| Cousins | 83 | 50 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 86 | 88 | 38 | 55 | 20 | 55 | 17 | 75 | 100 |
| Tkachuk | 75 | 53 | 67 | 50 | 71 | 38 | 100 | 33 | 77 | 46 | 60 | 43 | 69 | 50 | 65 | 0 | 91 | 67 |
| Perron | 20 | 80 | 86 | 75 | 79 | 80 | 20 | 100 | 60 | 50 | 50 | 82 | 43 | 89 | 71 | 88 | 78 | 67 |
| Zetterlund | 100 | 46 | 50 | 67 | 75 | 67 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 55 | 78 | 50 | 57 | 70 | 54 | 45 | 100 | 100 |
| Giroux | 10 | 77 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 57 | 0 | 80 | 36 | 50 | 38 | 43 | 25 | 74 | 50 | 82 | 67 | 0 |
| Batherson | 86 | 45 | 64 | 60 | 56 | 75 | 100 | 40 | 65 | 38 | 50 | 33 | 56 | 64 | 63 | 71 | 80 | 80 |
| Amadio | 54 | 25 | 63 | — | 75 | 45 | 41 | — | 50 | 55 | 67 | 0 | 52 | 47 | 73 | 57 | 56 | 57 |
| Sanderson | 47 | 80 | 67 | 100 | 50 | 48 | 35 | 100 | 48 | 69 | 57 | 67 | 52 | 59 | 81 | 75 | 64 | 38 |
| Chabot | 67 | 59 | 67 | 57 | 76 | 60 | 63 | 75 | 74 | 43 | 57 | 50 | 70 | 61 | 73 | 47 | 88 | 82 |
| Jensen | 67 | 45 | 47 | 57 | 60 | 50 | 63 | 50 | 56 | 38 | 50 | 50 | 56 | 50 | 52 | 46 | 80 | 75 |
| Zub | 43 | 25 | 67 | 100 | 50 | 44 | 31 | 100 | 31 | 58 | 50 | 0 | 43 | 44 | 78 | 67 | 38 | 43 |
| Spence | 50 | 53 | 75 | 33 | 70 | 50 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 58 | 75 | 50 | 36 | 60 | 64 | 67 | 67 | 50 |
| Kleven | 0 | 33 | 40 | 25 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 33 | 60 | 38 | 10 | 50 | 20 | 67 | 25 | 33 |
