Game Recap
The Detroit Red Wings defeated the Winnipeg Jets 2-1 on December 31, 2025. Despite the result, the Winnipeg Jets held the edge in expected goals (6.57 to 3.93) at 5-on-5, indicating the Detroit Red Wings received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Winnipeg Jets created 7 high-danger scoring chances compared to 3 from the Detroit Red Wings at 5-on-5. Nino Niederreiter was the most dangerous skater with 1.14 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Winnipeg Jets outshot the Detroit Red Wings 24-19 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Winnipeg Jets vs Detroit Red Wings progressed on Dec 31, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
WPG1 - 2DET
Dec 31, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| DET | P1 | 13 | 11 | 54.2 | 10 | 8 | 55.6 | 10 | 5 | 66.7 | 8 | 9 | 47.1 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | 2.14 | 3.03 | 41.4 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 14 | 15 | 48.3 | 9 | 11 | 45.0 | 6 | 11 | 35.3 | 10 | 8 | 55.6 | 1 | 3 | 25.0 | 1.55 | 2.25 | 40.7 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 7 | 29 | 19.4 | 4 | 16 | 20.0 | 3 | 8 | 27.3 | 3 | 20 | 13.0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.42 | 2.82 | 12.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 34 | 55 | 38.2 | 23 | 35 | 39.7 | 19 | 24 | 44.2 | 21 | 37 | 36.2 | 3 | 10 | 23.1 | 4.11 | 8.11 | 33.6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| WPG | P1 | 11 | 13 | 45.8 | 8 | 10 | 44.4 | 5 | 10 | 33.3 | 9 | 8 | 52.9 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | 3.03 | 2.14 | 58.6 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 15 | 14 | 51.7 | 11 | 9 | 55.0 | 11 | 6 | 64.7 | 8 | 10 | 44.4 | 3 | 1 | 75.0 | 2.25 | 1.55 | 59.3 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 29 | 7 | 80.6 | 16 | 4 | 80.0 | 8 | 3 | 72.7 | 20 | 3 | 87.0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0 | 2.82 | 0.42 | 87.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 55 | 34 | 61.8 | 35 | 23 | 60.3 | 24 | 19 | 55.8 | 37 | 21 | 63.8 | 10 | 3 | 76.9 | 8.11 | 4.11 | 66.4 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
Win Probability
DET Favored
WPG Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
DET
WPG
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
WPG Attempts
DET Attempts
Individual Event Map
WPG ShootDET Shoot
Shot on Net
Hit
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (DET) performed against every skater on the away team (WPG) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = DET players, Columns = WPG players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the DET player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| DET ↓ / WPG → | Scheifele | Vilardi | Perfetti | Toews | Lowry | Barron | Namestnikov | Connor | Iafallo | Pearson | Nyquist | Niederreiter | Pionk | Samberg | Morrissey | DeMelo | Stanley | Schenn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larkin | 54 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 54 | 50 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 53 | 60 | 50 | 56 | — | 100 |
| Finnie | 59 | 62 | — | — | 0 | — | — | 59 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 53 | 50 | 60 | 57 | — | 50 |
| Copp | 50 | 50 | 31 | 31 | 20 | — | 33 | 29 | 23 | 25 | 50 | 43 | 43 | 41 | 33 | 44 | 29 | 13 |
| Rasmussen | 25 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 43 | 42 | 0 | 22 | 33 | 45 | 17 | 0 | 43 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 71 | 71 |
| Appleton | 29 | 25 | 20 | 25 | 43 | 38 | 0 | 25 | 33 | 45 | 25 | 0 | 43 | 17 | 0 | 18 | 63 | 71 |
| Kasper | — | — | 27 | 30 | 67 | 50 | 0 | — | 29 | 67 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 17 | 67 | 60 |
| Danielson | — | 100 | 29 | 29 | 50 | 67 | 50 | — | 29 | 67 | 0 | 50 | — | 0 | 50 | 17 | 60 | 57 |
| Raymond | 55 | 60 | — | — | 100 | 50 | — | 57 | 50 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 50 | 60 | 53 | 63 | — | 100 |
| Compher | 25 | 22 | 25 | 25 | 46 | 42 | 0 | 29 | 33 | 50 | 17 | 0 | 43 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 71 | 71 |
| van Riemsdyk | 100 | 100 | 29 | 29 | 50 | 67 | 0 | 100 | 29 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 67 | 17 | 60 | 50 |
| Kane | 100 | 100 | 27 | 29 | 40 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 27 | 25 | 63 | 50 | 56 | 42 | 67 | 50 | 25 | 33 |
| DeBrincat | 100 | 100 | 29 | 29 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 27 | 25 | 63 | 57 | 56 | 44 | 67 | 56 | 25 | 33 |
| Seider | 52 | 57 | 50 | 50 | 43 | 33 | 0 | 52 | 40 | 29 | 40 | 25 | 57 | 54 | 45 | 42 | 63 | 60 |
| Edvinsson | 52 | 57 | 40 | 40 | 50 | 25 | 0 | 54 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 25 | 56 | 50 | 48 | 50 | 57 | 60 |
| Chiarot | 20 | 14 | 25 | 25 | 43 | 50 | 17 | 22 | 33 | 50 | 14 | 17 | 20 | 30 | 17 | 36 | 42 | 42 |
| Johansson | 33 | 33 | 20 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 29 | 15 | 0 | 40 | 50 | 25 | 18 | 33 | 18 | 33 | 67 |
| Bernard-Docker | 60 | 67 | 13 | 13 | — | — | 40 | 60 | 15 | — | 33 | 40 | 33 | 17 | 57 | 29 | 20 | 67 |
| Sandin-Pellikka | — | — | 29 | 33 | 46 | 56 | 25 | 25 | 33 | 50 | 20 | 20 | 100 | 38 | 0 | 30 | 42 | 38 |
