Game Recap
The Toronto Maple Leafs posted a 4-0 shutout against the New Jersey Devils on Tuesday. The underlying numbers told a different story — NJD actually held the xG edge (8.43 to 4.75) at 5-on-5, but it didn't matter on the scoreboard. Keep an eye on Hischier — 1.40 individual xG on 2 shots at 5-on-5. NJD outshot TOR 33-30.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as New Jersey Devils vs Toronto Maple Leafs progressed on Dec 30, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
NJD0 - 4TOR
Dec 30, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| TOR | P1 | 22 | 16 | 57.9 | 17 | 12 | 58.6 | 14 | 9 | 60.9 | 12 | 13 | 48.0 | 3 | 6 | 33.3 | 2.86 | 3.31 | 46.4 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 17 | 27 | 38.6 | 11 | 20 | 35.5 | 8 | 14 | 36.4 | 14 | 19 | 42.4 | 6 | 10 | 37.5 | 2.87 | 5.48 | 34.4 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 15 | 23 | 39.5 | 14 | 16 | 46.7 | 8 | 10 | 44.4 | 8 | 15 | 34.8 | 1 | 7 | 12.5 | 2.31 | 3.06 | 43.0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 54 | 66 | 45.0 | 42 | 48 | 46.7 | 30 | 33 | 47.6 | 34 | 47 | 42.0 | 10 | 23 | 30.3 | 8.04 | 11.84 | 40.4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| NJD | P1 | 16 | 22 | 42.1 | 12 | 17 | 41.4 | 9 | 14 | 39.1 | 13 | 12 | 52.0 | 6 | 3 | 66.7 | 3.31 | 2.86 | 53.6 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 27 | 17 | 61.4 | 20 | 11 | 64.5 | 14 | 8 | 63.6 | 19 | 14 | 57.6 | 10 | 6 | 62.5 | 5.48 | 2.87 | 65.6 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 23 | 15 | 60.5 | 16 | 14 | 53.3 | 10 | 8 | 55.6 | 15 | 8 | 65.2 | 7 | 1 | 87.5 | 3.06 | 2.31 | 57.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 66 | 54 | 55.0 | 48 | 42 | 53.3 | 33 | 30 | 52.4 | 47 | 34 | 58.0 | 23 | 10 | 69.7 | 11.84 | 8.04 | 59.6 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | |
Win Probability
TOR Favored
NJD Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
TOR
NJD
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
NJD Attempts
TOR Attempts
Individual Event Map
NJD ShootTOR Shoot
Missed Shot
Attempt Blocked
Hit
Takeaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (TOR) performed against every skater on the away team (NJD) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = TOR players, Columns = NJD players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the TOR player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| TOR ↓ / NJD → | Hischier | Mercer | Hughes | Glendening | Glass | Bratt | Cotter | Palat | Meier | Noesen | Gritsyuk | Brown | Hughes | Pesce | Hamilton | Siegenthaler | Dillon | White |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tavares | 38 | 40 | 33 | 83 | 33 | 33 | 100 | 27 | 28 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 11 | 57 | 50 | 42 | 45 | 17 |
| Domi | 23 | 25 | 17 | 80 | 0 | 20 | 100 | 27 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 54 | 40 | 36 | 33 | 0 |
| Roy | 57 | 83 | 55 | 89 | 57 | 54 | 88 | 80 | 75 | 67 | 64 | 50 | 47 | 72 | 85 | 83 | 86 | 86 |
| Laughton | 25 | 46 | 40 | 33 | 67 | 35 | 55 | 29 | 42 | 31 | 71 | 0 | 33 | 41 | 36 | 40 | 100 | 75 |
| McMann | 71 | 69 | 47 | 45 | 63 | 53 | 44 | 45 | 56 | 38 | 75 | 0 | 41 | 52 | 47 | 50 | 100 | 67 |
| Lorentz | 14 | 50 | 28 | 78 | 100 | 29 | 83 | 100 | 40 | 44 | 75 | 100 | 26 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 83 |
| Jarnkrok | 18 | 50 | 43 | 67 | 100 | 46 | 80 | 100 | 40 | 44 | 75 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 60 | 78 | 100 | 78 |
| Quillan | 0 | 100 | 25 | 67 | 100 | 0 | 67 | — | 100 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 29 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 67 |
| Knies | 33 | 39 | 25 | 83 | 0 | 22 | 100 | 14 | 25 | 50 | 33 | 100 | 0 | 60 | 44 | 22 | 44 | 17 |
| Robertson | 86 | 89 | 100 | 86 | 57 | 83 | 83 | 80 | 80 | 89 | 67 | 55 | 64 | 71 | 82 | 85 | 86 | 83 |
| Maccelli | 71 | 75 | 36 | 40 | 60 | 27 | 0 | 14 | 60 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 27 | 45 | 58 | 50 | 100 | 33 |
| Cowan | 67 | 67 | 100 | 86 | 60 | 80 | 80 | 67 | 67 | 86 | 58 | 55 | 56 | 58 | 82 | 79 | 70 | 75 |
| McCabe | 29 | 46 | 35 | 50 | 50 | 33 | 88 | 33 | 22 | 36 | 55 | 25 | 27 | 50 | 33 | 45 | 75 | 58 |
| Rielly | 40 | 56 | 17 | 53 | 100 | 20 | 42 | 33 | 46 | 33 | 50 | 86 | 15 | 43 | 64 | 67 | 100 | 67 |
| Ekman-Larsson | 64 | 54 | 43 | 50 | 50 | 48 | 80 | 39 | 33 | 50 | 60 | 38 | 40 | 53 | 47 | 50 | 67 | 45 |
| Myers | 15 | 29 | 14 | 30 | 83 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 29 | 27 | 71 | 80 | 17 | 27 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Stecher | 12 | 50 | 19 | 100 | 60 | 8 | 100 | — | 46 | 47 | 60 | 100 | 25 | 75 | 70 | 71 | 75 | 75 |
| Benoit | 20 | 60 | 45 | 100 | 63 | 20 | 100 | — | 55 | 83 | 70 | 80 | 55 | 55 | 70 | 75 | 70 | 71 |
