New Jersey Devils vs Utah Mammoth — December 19, 2025 Game Stats

Game Recap

The New Jersey Devils held on for a tight 2-1 win over the Utah Mammoth on December 19, 2025. UTA generated 8 high-danger looks compared to just 1 from NJD. NJD got the two points, but UTA held a 7.68-1.91 expected goals edge at even strength. Keep an eye on Marino — 1.38 individual xG on 1 shots at 5-on-5. Shots on goal: UTA 33, NJD 22.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as New Jersey Devils vs Utah Mammoth progressed on Dec 19, 2025
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

NJD2 - 1UTA

Dec 19, 2025 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
UTA	P1	20	22	47.6	12	12	50.0	7	9	43.8	10	14	41.7	6	2	75.0	2.98	1.87	61.4	1	0	100.0
	P2	29	13	69.0	21	11	65.6	18	6	75.0	18	8	69.2	4	2	66.7	4.52	2.07	68.6	0	1	0.0
	P3	24	14	63.2	12	9	57.1	8	7	53.3	19	8	70.4	4	2	66.7	2.79	1.24	69.3	0	1	0.0
	Total	73	49	59.8	45	32	58.4	33	22	60.0	47	30	61.0	14	6	70.0	10.29	5.18	66.5	1	2	33.3
NJD	P1	22	20	52.4	12	12	50.0	9	7	56.3	14	10	58.3	2	6	25.0	1.87	2.98	38.6	0	1	0.0
	P2	13	29	31.0	11	21	34.4	6	18	25.0	8	18	30.8	2	4	33.3	2.07	4.52	31.4	1	0	100.0
	P3	14	24	36.8	9	12	42.9	7	8	46.7	8	19	29.6	2	4	33.3	1.24	2.79	30.7	1	0	100.0
	Total	49	73	40.2	32	45	41.6	22	33	40.0	30	47	39.0	6	14	30.0	5.18	10.29	33.5	2	1	66.7

Win Probability

UTA Favored

NJD Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

UTA

NJD

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

NJD Attempts

UTA Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

NJD ShootUTA Shoot

Shot on Net

Hit

Shot Blocked

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (UTA) performed against every skater on the away team (NJD) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = UTA players, Columns = NJD players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the UTA player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

UTA ↓ / NJD →	Hischier	Mercer	Glass	Glendening	Parent	Bratt	Palat	Cotter	Lammikko	Crookshank	Brown	Noesen	Pesce	Siegenthaler	Hamilton	Hughes	Dillon	White
Schmaltz	38	40	53	100	100	18	64	60	100	100	61	50	83	73	38	44	86	75
Hayton	47	41	67	89	88	33	75	67	100	86	62	67	88	59	45	67	100	—
Stenlund	24	67	100	100	100	19	8	78	78	100	100	35	88	50	75	32	100	100
McBain	17	33	31	67	50	29	67	55	90	50	27	67	86	33	38	63	67	80
Kerfoot	71	100	100	100	100	60	33	60	67	100	100	43	100	67	50	75	100	100
O'Brien	80	75	100	100	100	67	100	78	78	100	100	78	75	60	75	86	100	100
Crouse	28	41	67	67	50	28	42	67	100	50	54	14	73	41	45	50	100	—
Carcone	40	63	86	80	80	50	67	90	88	75	67	86	90	67	71	71	80	67
But	25	43	71	67	67	33	43	89	86	50	50	67	67	56	71	44	78	67
Guenther	50	47	75	94	86	38	86	67	100	88	84	0	93	63	36	70	100	—
Keller	50	50	78	100	100	36	73	100	100	100	75	100	86	83	50	54	86	75
Peterka	43	40	78	100	100	30	73	100	100	100	75	100	83	73	44	54	86	75
Sergachev	30	50	77	100	100	28	43	80	100	100	76	38	91	50	17	50	100	100
Durzi	32	42	69	100	100	33	71	79	100	100	38	67	83	59	31	57	100	100
Cole	18	55	38	50	50	18	7	69	83	50	38	36	60	53	56	28	100	100
Marino	29	24	38	75	83	23	67	13	50	80	33	20	50	55	44	30	43	43
Schmidt	30	25	55	80	83	22	63	43	67	80	58	50	67	60	50	50	50	56
DeSimone	50	75	50	88	86	40	33	80	85	88	43	73	83	65	60	75	100	100