Game Recap
The Nashville Predators defeated the St. Louis Blues 7-2 on December 11, 2025. The Nashville Predators controlled play with 54.3% Corsi and generated 9.26 expected goals compared to 3.90 from the St. Louis Blues at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Nashville Predators created 13 high-danger scoring chances compared to 8 from the St. Louis Blues at 5-on-5. Steven Stamkos scored 4 goals. The Nashville Predators outshot the St. Louis Blues 32-26 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as St. Louis Blues vs Nashville Predators progressed on Dec 11, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
STL2 - 7NSH
Dec 11, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| NSH | P1 | 25 | 18 | 58.1 | 20 | 13 | 60.6 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 16 | 14 | 53.3 | 9 | 3 | 75.0 | 4.98 | 2.33 | 68.1 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 19 | 18 | 51.4 | 15 | 10 | 60.0 | 13 | 9 | 59.1 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 4.17 | 2.06 | 66.9 | 4 | 2 | 66.7 | |
| P3 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 7 | 8 | 46.7 | 8 | 9 | 47.1 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 2.31 | 0.94 | 71.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 56 | 48 | 53.8 | 44 | 32 | 57.9 | 32 | 26 | 55.2 | 37 | 38 | 49.3 | 15 | 8 | 65.2 | 11.46 | 5.34 | 68.2 | 7 | 2 | 77.8 | |
| STL | P1 | 18 | 25 | 41.9 | 13 | 20 | 39.4 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 14 | 16 | 46.7 | 3 | 9 | 25.0 | 2.33 | 4.98 | 31.9 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 18 | 19 | 48.6 | 10 | 15 | 40.0 | 9 | 13 | 40.9 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 2.06 | 4.17 | 33.1 | 2 | 4 | 33.3 | |
| P3 | 12 | 12 | 50.0 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 8 | 7 | 53.3 | 9 | 8 | 52.9 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 0.94 | 2.31 | 29.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 48 | 56 | 46.2 | 32 | 44 | 42.1 | 26 | 32 | 44.8 | 38 | 37 | 50.7 | 8 | 15 | 34.8 | 5.34 | 11.46 | 31.8 | 2 | 7 | 22.2 | |
Win Probability
NSH Favored
STL Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
NSH
STL
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
STL Attempts
NSH Attempts
Individual Event Map
STL ShootNSH Shoot
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Takeaway
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NSH) performed against every skater on the away team (STL) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = NSH players, Columns = STL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the NSH player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| NSH ↓ / STL → | Thomas | Schenn | Suter | Fabbri | Kaskimaki | Sundqvist | Buchnevich | Neighbours | Holloway | McGing | Dvorsky | Joseph | Broberg | Parayko | Fowler | Faulk | Mailloux | Tucker |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McCarron | 43 | 67 | 33 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 43 | 44 | 63 | 100 | 33 | 57 | 18 | 45 | 73 | 13 | 75 | 75 |
| O'Reilly | 46 | 33 | 40 | 40 | 50 | 57 | 46 | 45 | 60 | 67 | 40 | 100 | 38 | 50 | 45 | 63 | 50 | 75 |
| Stamkos | 60 | 75 | 75 | 90 | 63 | 60 | 60 | 88 | 86 | 86 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 73 | 83 | 79 | 89 | 92 |
| Svechkov | 100 | 71 | 78 | 85 | 63 | 67 | 100 | 100 | 70 | 88 | 87 | 78 | 54 | 82 | 100 | 69 | 92 | 85 |
| Forsberg | 58 | 33 | 43 | 50 | 60 | 71 | 58 | 62 | 60 | 75 | 50 | 50 | 41 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 75 | 67 |
| Haula | 71 | 67 | 80 | 33 | 20 | 50 | 71 | 50 | 70 | 30 | 50 | 63 | 75 | 60 | 56 | 50 | 55 | 50 |
| Schaefer | 46 | 75 | 0 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 46 | 40 | 67 | 100 | 38 | 57 | 18 | 50 | 78 | 14 | 75 | 75 |
| Bunting | 75 | 60 | 75 | 38 | 20 | 67 | 75 | 0 | 64 | 44 | 55 | 67 | 73 | 44 | 50 | 57 | 64 | 56 |
| Evangelista | 63 | 100 | 71 | 60 | 40 | 75 | 63 | 50 | 100 | 57 | 75 | 100 | 71 | 65 | 59 | 69 | 75 | 71 |
| Wood | 100 | 71 | 75 | 71 | 56 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 78 | 58 | 75 | 78 | 67 | 85 | 90 | 69 | 73 | 69 |
| Marchessault | 0 | 50 | 43 | 0 | 33 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 33 | 60 | 7 | 36 | 33 | 29 | 67 | 80 |
| Josi | 77 | 67 | 78 | 57 | 67 | 75 | 77 | 100 | 72 | 67 | 100 | 72 | 54 | 75 | 79 | 80 | 75 | 73 |
| Skjei | 53 | 33 | 40 | 33 | 36 | 40 | 53 | 41 | 29 | 57 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 45 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Perbix | 43 | 50 | 36 | 57 | 45 | 56 | 43 | 35 | 57 | 88 | 63 | 100 | 31 | 58 | 58 | 31 | 78 | 71 |
| Blankenburg | 70 | 50 | 44 | 56 | 0 | 75 | 70 | 69 | 67 | 44 | 65 | 100 | 64 | 60 | 56 | 78 | 63 | 65 |
| Hague | 33 | 67 | 83 | 75 | 0 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 67 | 0 | 50 | 56 | 33 | 57 | 67 | 36 | 100 | 83 |
| Wilsby | 38 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 57 | 67 | 38 | 38 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 50 | 57 | 31 | 50 | 50 |
| Stastney | 58 | 100 | 67 | 60 | — | 67 | 58 | 64 | 100 | 50 | 52 | 50 | 50 | 43 | 63 | 56 | 71 | 71 |
