Game Recap
The Nashville Predators defeated the Colorado Avalanche 4-3 in a shootout on December 9, 2025. The Nashville Predators controlled play with 39.8% Corsi and generated 9.10 expected goals compared to 7.55 from the Colorado Avalanche at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Nashville Predators created 11 high-danger scoring chances compared to 10 from the Colorado Avalanche at 5-on-5. Steven Stamkos was the most dangerous skater with 2.42 individual expected goals on 5 shots at 5-on-5. The Colorado Avalanche outshot the Nashville Predators 43-32 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games
- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Colorado Avalanche vs Nashville Predators progressed on Dec 9, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
COL3 - 4NSH (SO)
Dec 9, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| NSH | P1 | 19 | 20 | 48.7 | 15 | 14 | 51.7 | 11 | 13 | 45.8 | 14 | 15 | 48.3 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 2.82 | 3.60 | 43.9 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 8 | 32 | 20.0 | 8 | 22 | 26.7 | 6 | 13 | 31.6 | 5 | 25 | 16.7 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 2.18 | 3.84 | 36.2 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 17 | 23 | 42.5 | 14 | 18 | 43.8 | 9 | 12 | 42.9 | 10 | 14 | 41.7 | 6 | 1 | 85.7 | 4.73 | 2.30 | 67.3 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| OT | 6 | 4 | 60.0 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | 6 | 4 | 60.0 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 1.57 | 1.53 | 50.7 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| SO | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1.74 | 1.47 | 54.2 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 53 | 82 | 39.3 | 45 | 61 | 42.5 | 32 | 43 | 42.7 | 38 | 61 | 38.4 | 16 | 16 | 50.0 | 13.04 | 12.73 | 50.6 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | |
| COL | P1 | 20 | 19 | 51.3 | 14 | 15 | 48.3 | 13 | 11 | 54.2 | 15 | 14 | 51.7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 3.60 | 2.82 | 56.1 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 32 | 8 | 80.0 | 22 | 8 | 73.3 | 13 | 6 | 68.4 | 25 | 5 | 83.3 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 3.84 | 2.18 | 63.8 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 23 | 17 | 57.5 | 18 | 14 | 56.3 | 12 | 9 | 57.1 | 14 | 10 | 58.3 | 1 | 6 | 14.3 | 2.30 | 4.73 | 32.7 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| OT | 4 | 6 | 40.0 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | 4 | 6 | 40.0 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 1.53 | 1.57 | 49.3 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| SO | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 3 | 3 | 50.0 | 1.47 | 1.74 | 45.8 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 82 | 53 | 60.7 | 61 | 45 | 57.5 | 43 | 32 | 57.3 | 61 | 38 | 61.6 | 16 | 16 | 50.0 | 12.73 | 13.04 | 49.4 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | |
Win Probability
NSH Favored
COL Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
NSH
COL
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
COL Attempts
NSH Attempts
Individual Event Map
COL ShootNSH Shoot
Shot on Net
Missed Shot
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NSH) performed against every skater on the away team (COL) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = NSH players, Columns = COL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the NSH player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| NSH ↓ / COL → | MacKinnon | Necas | Nelson | Colton | Drury | Kelly | Bardakov | Lehkonen | Landeskog | Olofsson | Kiviranta | Nichushkin | Makar | Toews | Burns | Malinski | Manson | Girard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O'Reilly | 35 | 42 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 40 | — | 46 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 32 | 35 | 50 | 50 | 57 | 55 |
| Stamkos | 58 | 57 | 67 | 100 | 63 | 36 | 0 | 57 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 45 | 50 | 59 | 57 | 63 |
| McCarron | 39 | 41 | 27 | 43 | 50 | 20 | 0 | 47 | 30 | 50 | 0 | 25 | 31 | 45 | 25 | 55 | 29 | 67 |
| Svechkov | 55 | 38 | 90 | 100 | 60 | 0 | 50 | 43 | 100 | 88 | 0 | 89 | 60 | 50 | 75 | 64 | 50 | 67 |
| Forsberg | 45 | 47 | 32 | 18 | 71 | 40 | 67 | 50 | 19 | 56 | 9 | 73 | 29 | 38 | 50 | 50 | 36 | 50 |
| Haula | 24 | 24 | 11 | 0 | 30 | 50 | 100 | 35 | 0 | 22 | 25 | 20 | 14 | 31 | 33 | 27 | 13 | 30 |
| Bunting | 22 | 22 | 67 | 57 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 67 | 60 | 0 | 50 | 47 | 60 | 17 | 10 | 0 | 33 |
| Schaefer | 0 | 0 | 38 | 33 | 20 | — | — | 0 | 60 | 20 | 0 | 17 | 43 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Evangelista | 53 | 56 | 91 | 80 | 100 | 33 | 100 | 56 | 20 | 67 | 0 | 60 | 50 | 53 | 55 | 72 | 58 | 75 |
| Marchessault | 25 | 46 | 6 | 0 | 55 | 63 | 100 | 38 | 0 | 44 | 33 | 33 | 17 | 27 | 44 | 40 | 33 | 27 |
| Wood | 0 | 0 | 100 | — | 20 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 100 | 50 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 25 | 33 | 43 | 50 | 50 |
| Skjei | 37 | 43 | 38 | 33 | 33 | 14 | — | 48 | 8 | 40 | 0 | 11 | 29 | 40 | 36 | 52 | 50 | 63 |
| Josi | 25 | 42 | 28 | 17 | 60 | 38 | 100 | 44 | 15 | 58 | 0 | 55 | 32 | 44 | 50 | 36 | 36 | 18 |
| Hague | 0 | 0 | 19 | 18 | 13 | 25 | 100 | 0 | 17 | 43 | 25 | 27 | 21 | 36 | 25 | 9 | 13 | 8 |
| Perbix | 17 | 19 | 27 | 33 | 20 | 50 | 100 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 25 | 9 | 25 | 36 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 20 |
| Wilsby | 51 | 50 | 33 | 50 | 40 | 25 | — | 59 | 20 | 25 | 0 | 20 | 39 | 38 | 57 | 55 | 71 | 65 |
| Stastney | 71 | 60 | 67 | 56 | 57 | 20 | 0 | 67 | 83 | 75 | 0 | 75 | 63 | 57 | 25 | 58 | 33 | 70 |
| Blankenburg | 50 | 33 | 50 | 57 | 83 | 20 | 0 | 50 | 100 | 67 | 0 | 58 | 33 | 50 | 33 | 60 | 40 | 70 |