San Jose Sharks vs Philadelphia Flyers — December 9, 2025 Game Stats

Game Recap

PHI 4, SJS 1 — the Philadelphia Flyers got the win on December 9, 2025. The numbers backed up the result — PHI generated 7.93 expected goals to SJS's 3.58 at 5-on-5 (64.1% Corsi). PHI had a big edge in high-danger chances, 14-4 over SJS at 5-on-5. PHI outshot SJS 30-18.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as San Jose Sharks vs Philadelphia Flyers progressed on Dec 9, 2025
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

SJS1 - 4PHI

Dec 9, 2025 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
PHI	P1	31	10	75.6	22	7	75.9	16	3	84.2	19	9	67.9	11	1	91.7	5.54	1.60	77.6	1	1	50.0
	P2	23	14	62.2	15	9	62.5	10	8	55.6	14	9	60.9	4	2	66.7	2.83	1.93	59.5	2	0	100.0
	P3	8	14	36.4	5	10	33.3	4	7	36.4	3	10	23.1	0	3	0.0	0.35	1.74	16.9	1	0	100.0
	Total	62	38	62.0	42	26	61.8	30	18	62.5	36	28	56.3	15	6	71.4	8.72	5.27	62.3	4	1	80.0
SJS	P1	10	31	24.4	7	22	24.1	3	16	15.8	9	19	32.1	1	11	8.3	1.60	5.54	22.4	1	1	50.0
	P2	14	23	37.8	9	15	37.5	8	10	44.4	9	14	39.1	2	4	33.3	1.93	2.83	40.5	0	2	0.0
	P3	14	8	63.6	10	5	66.7	7	4	63.6	10	3	76.9	3	0	100.0	1.74	0.35	83.1	0	1	0.0
	Total	38	62	38.0	26	42	38.2	18	30	37.5	28	36	43.8	6	15	28.6	5.27	8.72	37.7	1	4	20.0

Win Probability

PHI Favored

SJS Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

PHI

SJS

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

SJS Attempts

PHI Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

SJS ShootPHI Shoot

Missed Shot

Hit

Hit Taken

Takeaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (PHI) performed against every skater on the away team (SJS) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = PHI players, Columns = SJS players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the PHI player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

PHI ↓ / SJS →	Wennberg	Celebrini	Kurashev	Dellandrea	Toffoli	Smith	Goodrow	Ostapchuk	Eklund	Graf	Gaudette	Reaves	Klingberg	Liljegren	Ferraro	Dickinson	Leddy	Orlov
Dvorak	44	63	29	57	42	77	86	100	36	69	25	100	42	83	83	30	46	79
Zegras	50	77	33	63	50	83	83	100	42	71	29	100	50	88	77	30	47	85
Couturier	55	53	40	75	38	50	0	0	50	83	80	0	62	44	88	91	83	25
Abols	33	50	50	50	33	33	100	80	33	100	63	67	56	57	75	75	67	56
Cates	55	67	82	91	43	43	—	—	55	88	85	—	25	100	80	88	73	80
Konecny	58	73	40	71	56	73	100	100	50	76	40	100	50	83	83	44	67	73
Brink	55	67	50	67	43	50	50	100	55	78	64	50	20	91	80	75	60	80
Hathaway	25	33	55	50	25	50	100	80	20	100	63	80	60	67	80	50	60	63
Tippett	75	71	75	83	75	71	60	0	75	75	86	0	100	57	80	100	67	17
Michkov	75	67	75	88	75	67	0	0	75	78	86	0	100	50	83	91	75	14
Grundstrom	25	33	50	50	25	33	100	83	25	67	63	71	55	67	80	75	67	56
Grebenkin	60	100	83	83	60	100	—	—	60	100	83	—	100	100	50	78	63	100
Drysdale	58	77	70	80	43	78	100	100	53	85	82	100	69	81	79	72	60	70
Sanheim	40	55	60	73	44	55	83	75	36	74	73	60	44	82	80	79	73	67
Andrae	72	73	45	63	62	71	50	100	69	69	60	67	67	80	87	58	57	73
Seeler	30	62	75	85	38	59	67	67	30	82	80	67	47	84	80	84	75	67
Murchison	38	0	40	50	43	—	67	67	38	33	40	67	63	40	71	43	45	33
Juulsen	25	20	38	40	25	50	80	67	20	67	43	67	43	40	67	67	71	29