Game Recap
The Edmonton Oilers defeated the Winnipeg Jets 6-2 on December 6, 2025. The Edmonton Oilers controlled play with 48.8% Corsi and generated 8.16 expected goals compared to 5.56 from the Winnipeg Jets at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. Connor McDavid was the most dangerous skater with 1.96 individual expected goals on 5 shots at 5-on-5. The Edmonton Oilers outshot the Winnipeg Jets 27-21 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Winnipeg Jets vs Edmonton Oilers progressed on Dec 6, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
WPG2 - 6EDM
Dec 6, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| EDM | P1 | 20 | 15 | 57.1 | 18 | 9 | 66.7 | 16 | 5 | 76.2 | 13 | 8 | 61.9 | 5 | 2 | 71.4 | 4.53 | 1.15 | 79.7 | 4 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 13 | 6 | 68.4 | 5 | 4 | 55.6 | 8 | 5 | 61.5 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 2.02 | 0.62 | 76.6 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 12 | 22 | 35.3 | 10 | 20 | 33.3 | 6 | 12 | 33.3 | 8 | 16 | 33.3 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 2.49 | 4.76 | 34.4 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | |
| Total | 47 | 48 | 49.5 | 41 | 35 | 53.9 | 27 | 21 | 56.3 | 29 | 29 | 50.0 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 9.04 | 6.53 | 58.1 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | |
| WPG | P1 | 15 | 20 | 42.9 | 9 | 18 | 33.3 | 5 | 16 | 23.8 | 8 | 13 | 38.1 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 1.15 | 4.53 | 20.3 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 6 | 13 | 31.6 | 4 | 5 | 44.4 | 5 | 8 | 38.5 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | 0.62 | 2.02 | 23.4 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 22 | 12 | 64.7 | 20 | 10 | 66.7 | 12 | 6 | 66.7 | 16 | 8 | 66.7 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 4.76 | 2.49 | 65.6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7 | |
| Total | 48 | 47 | 50.5 | 35 | 41 | 46.1 | 21 | 27 | 43.8 | 29 | 29 | 50.0 | 9 | 9 | 50.0 | 6.53 | 9.04 | 41.9 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | |
Win Probability
EDM Favored
WPG Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
EDM
WPG
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
WPG Attempts
EDM Attempts
Individual Event Map
WPG ShootEDM Shoot
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (EDM) performed against every skater on the away team (WPG) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = EDM players, Columns = WPG players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the EDM player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| EDM ↓ / WPG → | Scheifele | Vilardi | Lowry | Toews | Barron | Namestnikov | Perfetti | Connor | Iafallo | Koepke | Pearson | Niederreiter | Pionk | Samberg | Morrissey | DeMelo | Stanley | Schenn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draisaitl | 47 | 61 | 77 | 83 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 43 | 67 | 0 | 25 | 100 | 50 | 22 | 79 | 90 | 50 | 50 |
| Savoie | 54 | 67 | 90 | 91 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 50 | 17 | 86 | 91 | 57 | 50 |
| Lazar | 75 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 50 | 80 | 75 | 45 | 50 | 44 | 43 | 29 | 38 | 60 | 56 | 67 | 67 |
| Frederic | 75 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 44 | 80 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 38 | 29 | 38 | 60 | 56 | 50 | 67 |
| McDavid | 63 | 62 | 38 | 33 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 63 | 70 | 75 | 67 | 100 | 42 | 50 | 69 | 82 | 59 | 83 |
| Nugent-Hopkins | 60 | 65 | 60 | 40 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 64 | 75 | 80 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 83 | 65 | 83 |
| Henrique | 25 | 100 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 14 | 50 | 60 | 0 | 25 | 33 | 33 | 22 | 43 | 75 | 0 | 22 |
| Janmark | 20 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 25 | 31 | 25 | 33 | 40 | 25 | 40 | 33 | 33 | 22 | 38 | 75 | 0 | 30 |
| Hyman | 54 | 60 | 50 | 33 | 60 | 86 | 100 | 58 | 67 | 75 | 67 | 86 | 50 | 33 | 62 | 75 | 60 | 80 |
| Mangiapane | 25 | 25 | 33 | 0 | 25 | 42 | 25 | 25 | 60 | 25 | 40 | 45 | 20 | 18 | 57 | 67 | 0 | 30 |
| Podkolzin | 50 | 67 | 90 | 91 | 0 | — | 100 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 56 | 0 | 75 | 88 | 57 | 50 |
| Tomasek | 100 | 67 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 50 | 80 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 44 | 43 | 29 | 38 | 67 | 56 | 75 | 70 |
| Nurse | 50 | 76 | 71 | 78 | 44 | 30 | 57 | 60 | 14 | 56 | 44 | 30 | 55 | 15 | 69 | 71 | 59 | 50 |
| Regula | 50 | 81 | 70 | 78 | 29 | 42 | 57 | 60 | 36 | 43 | 29 | 42 | 47 | 15 | 71 | 80 | 56 | 50 |
| Bouchard | 54 | 36 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 75 | 67 | 50 | 71 | 33 | 40 | 75 | 27 | 30 | 69 | 80 | 14 | 44 |
| Ekholm | 58 | 42 | 43 | 50 | 40 | 67 | 67 | 55 | 75 | 40 | 40 | 67 | 30 | 30 | 71 | 82 | 17 | 38 |
| Kulak | 50 | 50 | 62 | 50 | 50 | 64 | 50 | 43 | 67 | 50 | 67 | 69 | 57 | 50 | 54 | 67 | 73 | 60 |
| Emberson | 50 | 44 | 56 | 50 | 67 | 58 | 50 | 44 | 58 | 67 | 75 | 64 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 57 | 64 |
