Utah Mammoth vs Calgary Flames — December 6, 2025 Game Stats

Game Recap

The Calgary Flames shut out the Utah Mammoth 2-0 on December 6, 2025. Despite the result, the Utah Mammoth held the edge in expected goals (9.31 to 6.61) at 5-on-5, indicating the Calgary Flames received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Utah Mammoth created 16 high-danger scoring chances compared to 9 from the Calgary Flames at 5-on-5. Lawson Crouse was the most dangerous skater with 1.61 individual expected goals on 2 shots at 5-on-5. The Utah Mammoth outshot the Calgary Flames 28-23 in total shots on goal.

← Back to Games

xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Utah Mammoth vs Calgary Flames progressed on Dec 6, 2025
Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations

UTA0 - 2CGY

Dec 6, 2025 · Regular Season

Strength:

Overview

	Period	Corsi			Fenwick			Shots			SC			HDSC			xG			Goals
		F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%	F	A	%
CGY	P1	19	22	46.3	14	18	43.8	9	12	42.9	17	11	60.7	5	3	62.5	3.63	3.95	47.9	1	0	100.0
	P2	18	15	54.5	12	11	52.2	5	9	35.7	11	12	47.8	5	4	55.6	3.32	2.70	55.1	0	0	—
	P3	16	21	43.2	13	9	59.1	9	7	56.3	7	19	26.9	2	9	18.2	1.81	2.66	40.4	1	0	100.0
	Total	53	58	47.7	39	38	50.6	23	28	45.1	35	42	45.5	12	16	42.9	8.75	9.31	48.4	2	0	100.0
UTA	P1	22	19	53.7	18	14	56.3	12	9	57.1	11	17	39.3	3	5	37.5	3.95	3.63	52.1	0	1	0.0
	P2	15	18	45.5	11	12	47.8	9	5	64.3	12	11	52.2	4	5	44.4	2.70	3.32	44.9	0	0	—
	P3	21	16	56.8	9	13	40.9	7	9	43.8	19	7	73.1	9	2	81.8	2.66	1.81	59.6	0	1	0.0
	Total	58	53	52.3	38	39	49.4	28	23	54.9	42	35	54.5	16	12	57.1	9.31	8.75	51.6	0	2	0.0

Win Probability

CGY Favored

UTA Favored

Goal

Power Play

Gameflow — Cumulative xG

CGY

UTA

Goal

Shot Density Heatmap

UTA Attempts

CGY Attempts

Individual Event Map

Player:

UTA ShootCGY Shoot

Shot on Net

Missed Shot

Hit

Hit Taken

Takeaway

Player Matchup Grid

This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CGY) performed against every skater on the away team (UTA) when they were on the ice at the same time.

Rows = CGY players, Columns = UTA players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
Green = the CGY player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.

Stat:

CGY ↓ / UTA →	Schmaltz	McBain	Stenlund	Hayton	O'Brien	Crouse	Carcone	But	Peterka	Keller	Guenther	Yamamoto	Sergachev	Durzi	Marino	Schmidt	Cole	Lamoureux
Kadri	50	65	83	33	50	63	63	40	50	50	67	0	56	43	58	62	100	—
Backlund	35	80	80	0	—	90	80	0	32	35	33	—	53	48	29	44	80	0
Zary	35	67	83	100	—	82	71	50	32	35	67	100	53	50	29	47	75	40
Sharangovich	71	67	100	29	—	67	64	40	71	63	55	0	58	50	53	71	100	—
Frost	50	33	50	56	20	39	23	63	50	33	55	0	54	50	46	44	44	11
Beecher	100	100	57	50	50	—	100	75	75	75	67	63	67	80	50	75	67	57
Coleman	35	67	100	—	—	82	67	—	32	35	100	—	53	53	33	47	67	0
Farabee	44	47	100	29	—	38	44	40	44	40	55	0	40	43	50	45	100	0
Huberdeau	50	46	44	50	0	53	40	50	50	50	54	0	83	40	75	37	50	10
Lomberg	100	20	60	50	60	0	0	100	67	67	100	67	17	80	17	75	75	67
Coronato	50	53	42	50	17	57	50	45	50	50	50	0	58	42	50	60	45	17
Klapka	100	100	67	67	60	—	100	100	67	67	100	71	50	80	50	75	83	80
Weegar	31	78	71	64	33	85	75	64	27	31	58	50	47	59	40	62	67	33
Kuznetsov	31	78	33	64	33	75	75	64	31	31	58	50	33	57	45	62	40	33
Andersson	55	69	71	0	—	64	71	0	52	50	60	50	67	43	59	56	88	33
Bahl	52	67	40	0	0	58	71	0	48	48	50	33	57	43	53	54	57	20
Bean	—	25	44	40	38	21	15	50	—	—	50	43	33	40	36	20	44	25
Hanley	100	29	56	50	50	21	15	60	100	100	60	50	40	50	42	27	57	30