Game Recap
The New York Islanders shut out the Tampa Bay Lightning 2-0 on December 6, 2025. Despite the result, the Tampa Bay Lightning held the edge in expected goals (5.98 to 3.39) at 5-on-5, indicating the New York Islanders received favorable bounces or strong goaltending. The Tampa Bay Lightning created 13 high-danger scoring chances compared to 2 from the New York Islanders at 5-on-5. Brandon Hagel was the most dangerous skater with 1.07 individual expected goals on 4 shots at 5-on-5. The Tampa Bay Lightning outshot the New York Islanders 32-19 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as New York Islanders vs Tampa Bay Lightning progressed on Dec 6, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
NYI2 - 0TBL
Dec 6, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| TBL | P1 | 22 | 12 | 64.7 | 16 | 8 | 66.7 | 9 | 4 | 69.2 | 17 | 6 | 73.9 | 6 | 1 | 85.7 | 3.18 | 1.11 | 74.2 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 24 | 14 | 63.2 | 17 | 10 | 63.0 | 12 | 8 | 60.0 | 18 | 10 | 64.3 | 8 | 3 | 72.7 | 4.59 | 2.56 | 64.2 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 28 | 16 | 63.6 | 17 | 14 | 54.8 | 11 | 7 | 61.1 | 20 | 8 | 71.4 | 9 | 2 | 81.8 | 3.91 | 2.44 | 61.6 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 74 | 42 | 63.8 | 50 | 32 | 61.0 | 32 | 19 | 62.7 | 55 | 24 | 69.6 | 23 | 6 | 79.3 | 11.68 | 6.11 | 65.7 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| NYI | P1 | 12 | 22 | 35.3 | 8 | 16 | 33.3 | 4 | 9 | 30.8 | 6 | 17 | 26.1 | 1 | 6 | 14.3 | 1.11 | 3.18 | 25.8 | 0 | 0 | — |
| P2 | 14 | 24 | 36.8 | 10 | 17 | 37.0 | 8 | 12 | 40.0 | 10 | 18 | 35.7 | 3 | 8 | 27.3 | 2.56 | 4.59 | 35.8 | 0 | 0 | — | |
| P3 | 16 | 28 | 36.4 | 14 | 17 | 45.2 | 7 | 11 | 38.9 | 8 | 20 | 28.6 | 2 | 9 | 18.2 | 2.44 | 3.91 | 38.4 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 42 | 74 | 36.2 | 32 | 50 | 39.0 | 19 | 32 | 37.3 | 24 | 55 | 30.4 | 6 | 23 | 20.7 | 6.11 | 11.68 | 34.3 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
Win Probability
TBL Favored
NYI Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
TBL
NYI
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
NYI Attempts
TBL Attempts
Individual Event Map
NYI ShootTBL Shoot
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (TBL) performed against every skater on the away team (NYI) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = TBL players, Columns = NYI players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the TBL player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| TBL ↓ / NYI → | Horvat | Cizikas | Barzal | Gatcomb | MacLean | Ritchie | Heineman | Lee | Duclair | Holmstrom | Shabanov | Tsyplakov | Pelech | Schaefer | Pulock | Mayfield | DeAngelo | Boqvist |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cirelli | 81 | 83 | 67 | 0 | 50 | 13 | 56 | 58 | 25 | 72 | 56 | 67 | 88 | 61 | 80 | 56 | 62 | 0 |
| Guentzel | 80 | 83 | 69 | 0 | 50 | 22 | 53 | 58 | 29 | 73 | 50 | 67 | 88 | 58 | 75 | 67 | 62 | — |
| Gourde | 65 | — | 0 | — | — | 50 | 68 | 0 | 33 | 71 | 61 | 0 | 67 | 45 | 43 | 67 | 56 | 63 |
| Girgensons | 63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 25 | 67 | 0 | 20 | 67 | 63 | 0 | 67 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 63 | 50 |
| James | 67 | 38 | 0 | 17 | 17 | 71 | 80 | 0 | 67 | 71 | 67 | 0 | 20 | 27 | 45 | 77 | 40 | 100 |
| Goncalves | — | 70 | 40 | 86 | 75 | 33 | 67 | 20 | 33 | 33 | — | 33 | 80 | 25 | 75 | 73 | 33 | 75 |
| Finley | — | 67 | 33 | 100 | 75 | 0 | 100 | 20 | 0 | 0 | — | 20 | 100 | 17 | 50 | 80 | 100 | 67 |
| Douglas | — | 67 | 67 | 100 | 75 | — | — | 50 | — | 0 | — | 50 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 67 |
| Hagel | 81 | 88 | 71 | 0 | 100 | 33 | 71 | 73 | 33 | 83 | 60 | 67 | 81 | 67 | 81 | 75 | 67 | — |
| Paul | 84 | 72 | 0 | 36 | 40 | 83 | 67 | 0 | 83 | 93 | 75 | 0 | 90 | 47 | 77 | 74 | 67 | 100 |
| Holmberg | 67 | — | 0 | — | — | 33 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 62 | 0 | 63 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 56 | 50 |
| Bjorkstrand | 60 | 50 | 0 | 36 | 40 | 60 | 63 | 0 | 60 | 60 | 75 | — | 44 | 25 | 42 | 76 | 33 | 100 |
| Raddysh | 67 | 92 | 50 | — | 100 | 55 | 44 | 50 | 50 | 78 | 29 | 56 | 71 | 52 | 70 | 67 | 29 | 67 |
| Moser | 45 | 33 | 59 | 0 | 50 | 46 | 11 | 52 | 50 | 50 | 25 | 60 | 45 | 50 | 55 | 67 | 38 | 80 |
| D'Astous | 81 | 89 | 0 | 67 | 67 | 40 | 78 | 0 | 33 | 86 | 72 | 0 | 88 | 60 | 85 | 80 | 67 | 88 |
| Lilleberg | 74 | 40 | 57 | 50 | 50 | 22 | 64 | 38 | 29 | 25 | 70 | 0 | 71 | 40 | 57 | 70 | 56 | 88 |
| Hedman | 71 | 42 | 20 | 46 | 50 | 63 | 63 | 0 | 56 | 64 | 75 | 0 | 70 | 27 | 29 | 60 | 71 | 67 |
| Crozier | 71 | 36 | 20 | 45 | 45 | 63 | 63 | 0 | 71 | 70 | 75 | 0 | 78 | 27 | 33 | 57 | 83 | 71 |
