Game Recap
The Tampa Bay Lightning defeated the New York Rangers 4-1 on November 29, 2025. The Tampa Bay Lightning controlled play with 62.1% Corsi and generated 11.12 expected goals compared to 3.17 from the New York Rangers at 5-on-5, suggesting the result was well-earned. The Tampa Bay Lightning created 15 high-danger scoring chances compared to 4 from the New York Rangers at 5-on-5. Brandon Hagel scored 2 goals. The Tampa Bay Lightning outshot the New York Rangers 35-13 in total shots on goal.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Tampa Bay Lightning vs New York Rangers progressed on Nov 29, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
TBL4 - 1NYR
Nov 29, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| NYR | P1 | 10 | 24 | 29.4 | 6 | 16 | 27.3 | 2 | 11 | 15.4 | 4 | 15 | 21.1 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 0.76 | 4.49 | 14.4 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 |
| P2 | 21 | 26 | 44.7 | 13 | 24 | 35.1 | 7 | 16 | 30.4 | 12 | 14 | 46.2 | 3 | 5 | 37.5 | 2.80 | 4.94 | 36.2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 21 | 20 | 51.2 | 11 | 15 | 42.3 | 4 | 8 | 33.3 | 14 | 15 | 48.3 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 2.33 | 3.02 | 43.5 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 52 | 70 | 42.6 | 30 | 55 | 35.3 | 13 | 35 | 27.1 | 30 | 44 | 40.5 | 8 | 15 | 34.8 | 5.89 | 12.45 | 32.1 | 1 | 4 | 20.0 | |
| TBL | P1 | 24 | 10 | 70.6 | 16 | 6 | 72.7 | 11 | 2 | 84.6 | 15 | 4 | 78.9 | 6 | 2 | 75.0 | 4.49 | 0.76 | 85.6 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 |
| P2 | 26 | 21 | 55.3 | 24 | 13 | 64.9 | 16 | 7 | 69.6 | 14 | 12 | 53.8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | 4.94 | 2.80 | 63.8 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| P3 | 20 | 21 | 48.8 | 15 | 11 | 57.7 | 8 | 4 | 66.7 | 15 | 14 | 51.7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | 3.02 | 2.33 | 56.5 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 70 | 52 | 57.4 | 55 | 30 | 64.7 | 35 | 13 | 72.9 | 44 | 30 | 59.5 | 15 | 8 | 65.2 | 12.45 | 5.89 | 67.9 | 4 | 1 | 80.0 | |
Win Probability
NYR Favored
TBL Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
NYR
TBL
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
TBL Attempts
NYR Attempts
Individual Event Map
TBL ShootNYR Shoot
Shot on Net
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (NYR) performed against every skater on the away team (TBL) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = NYR players, Columns = TBL players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the NYR player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| NYR ↓ / TBL → | Cirelli | Girgensons | Gourde | Guentzel | Goncalves | James | Douglas | Hagel | Paul | Kucherov | Holmberg | Bjorkstrand | Moser | Raddysh | Lilleberg | D'Astous | Carlile | Santini |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trocheck | 56 | 77 | 74 | 33 | 43 | 29 | 50 | 53 | 36 | 29 | 74 | 25 | 74 | 60 | 59 | 52 | 25 | 0 |
| Zibanejad | 56 | 57 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 33 | 52 | 14 | 35 | 46 | 0 | 57 | 36 | 59 | 50 | 0 | 40 |
| Miller | 63 | 57 | 50 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 33 | 58 | 25 | 39 | 46 | 17 | 64 | 45 | 59 | 50 | 25 | 40 |
| Laba | 13 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 25 | 17 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 20 | 20 |
| Brodzinski | 0 | 13 | 13 | 20 | — | 20 | — | 0 | 100 | 14 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 20 |
| Carrick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 71 | 17 | 50 | 0 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 33 | 67 | 67 | 36 | 17 |
| Edstrom | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 71 | 17 | 50 | 0 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 33 | 67 | 67 | 36 | 17 |
| Cuylle | 60 | 81 | 78 | 33 | 43 | 33 | 50 | 56 | 36 | 33 | 77 | 25 | 77 | 63 | 59 | 55 | 40 | 0 |
| Panarin | 53 | 81 | 78 | 42 | 43 | 33 | 50 | 53 | 57 | 36 | 77 | 40 | 69 | 63 | 61 | 58 | 40 | 0 |
| Lafrenière | 43 | 50 | 43 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 39 | 50 | 42 | 43 | 0 | 44 | 39 | 44 | 42 | 40 | 50 |
| Berard | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Raddysh | 25 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 45 | 29 | 33 | 25 | 45 | 25 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 23 | 50 | 75 | 36 | 17 |
| Gavrikov | 33 | 60 | 57 | 0 | 83 | 0 | 67 | 27 | 36 | 19 | 60 | 23 | 46 | 36 | 47 | 50 | 45 | 20 |
| Borgen | 17 | 31 | 31 | 22 | 13 | 40 | 25 | 21 | 22 | 15 | 40 | 18 | 34 | 25 | 13 | 17 | 10 | 30 |
| Soucy | 36 | 24 | 24 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 50 | 45 | 31 | 29 | 32 | 33 | 44 | 38 | 23 | 29 | 0 | 25 |
| Fox | 55 | 71 | 69 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 67 | 45 | 50 | 40 | 69 | 0 | 78 | 75 | 56 | 53 | 60 | 33 |
| Schneider | 50 | 43 | 43 | 27 | 67 | 25 | 0 | 50 | 80 | 50 | 43 | 42 | 0 | 30 | 60 | 58 | 50 | 20 |
| Robertson | 0 | 50 | 50 | 31 | 50 | 17 | 50 | 0 | 75 | 11 | 50 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 67 | 17 | 25 |
