Game Recap
The Columbus Blue Jackets pushed the Pittsburgh Penguins to the limit before falling 4-3 in overtime on November 28, 2025. Crosby put up 2 goals. PIT had the better of the chances at even strength, putting up 8.91 xG against 7.64 while holding 49.5% of shot attempts. Shots on goal: CBJ 29, PIT 24.
← Back to Games

- xG Gameflow — cumulative expected goals chart tracking each team's xG as Pittsburgh Penguins vs Columbus Blue Jackets progressed on Nov 28, 2025
- Shot heatmap — where shots were taken on the ice, color-coded by scoring probability
- Event timeline — every goal, penalty, and key play mapped chronologically
- Player matchup grid — head-to-head on-ice performance in Corsi and expected goals
- Strength filter — 5v5 by default, with options for power play, penalty kill, and all situations
PIT4 - 3CBJ (OT)
Nov 28, 2025 · Regular Season
Overview
| Period | Corsi | Fenwick | Shots | SC | HDSC | xG | Goals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | F | A | % | ||
| CBJ | P1 | 23 | 18 | 56.1 | 13 | 15 | 46.4 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 18 | 13 | 58.1 | 5 | 5 | 50.0 | 2.73 | 4.50 | 37.7 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 22 | 20 | 52.4 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 13 | 7 | 65.0 | 16 | 13 | 55.2 | 8 | 3 | 72.7 | 3.68 | 2.72 | 57.5 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| P3 | 18 | 17 | 51.4 | 11 | 12 | 47.8 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 11 | 11 | 50.0 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 3.32 | 2.01 | 62.3 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| OT | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | |
| Total | 63 | 56 | 52.9 | 41 | 41 | 50.0 | 29 | 24 | 54.7 | 45 | 38 | 54.2 | 17 | 13 | 56.7 | 9.73 | 9.75 | 49.9 | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | |
| PIT | P1 | 18 | 23 | 43.9 | 15 | 13 | 53.6 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 13 | 18 | 41.9 | 5 | 5 | 50.0 | 4.50 | 2.73 | 62.3 | 1 | 1 | 50.0 |
| P2 | 20 | 22 | 47.6 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 7 | 13 | 35.0 | 13 | 16 | 44.8 | 3 | 8 | 27.3 | 2.72 | 3.68 | 42.5 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | |
| P3 | 17 | 18 | 48.6 | 12 | 11 | 52.2 | 8 | 8 | 50.0 | 11 | 11 | 50.0 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 2.01 | 3.32 | 37.7 | 2 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| OT | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 56 | 63 | 47.1 | 41 | 41 | 50.0 | 24 | 29 | 45.3 | 38 | 45 | 45.8 | 13 | 17 | 43.3 | 9.75 | 9.73 | 50.1 | 4 | 3 | 57.1 | |
Win Probability
CBJ Favored
PIT Favored
Goal
Power Play
Gameflow — Cumulative xG
CBJ
PIT
Goal
Shot Density Heatmap
PIT Attempts
CBJ Attempts
Individual Event Map
PIT ShootCBJ Shoot
Shot on Net
Attempt Blocked
Hit Taken
Shot Blocked
Giveaway
Player Matchup Grid
This grid shows how every skater on the home team (CBJ) performed against every skater on the away team (PIT) when they were on the ice at the same time.
- Rows = CBJ players, Columns = PIT players. Forwards are listed first, then defensemen.
- Green = the CBJ player had a favorable matchup (above 50%). Red = unfavorable (below 50%).
- Values shown from the home team's perspective. Toggle between CF% (shot attempt share) and xGF% (expected goal share).
- Cells with fewer than 3 shared events are grayed out (insufficient sample). Hover over any cell for full details.
| CBJ ↓ / PIT → | Crosby | Lizotte | Malkin | Dewar | Novak | Kindel | Koppanen | Heinen | Rust | Hayes | Mantha | Koivunen | Karlsson | Wotherspoon | Letang | Shea | Graves | Dumba |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coyle | 46 | 55 | 14 | 56 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 43 | 43 | 0 | 50 | 67 | 69 | 12 | 9 | 30 | 38 |
| Lundeström | 48 | 56 | 20 | 33 | 11 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 43 | 41 | 20 | 29 | 60 | 64 | 22 | 25 | 27 | 33 |
| Monahan | 40 | 90 | 64 | 89 | 59 | 60 | 100 | 67 | 56 | 20 | 68 | 33 | 83 | 91 | 47 | 57 | 63 | 67 |
| Sillinger | 25 | 88 | 63 | 83 | 54 | 38 | 75 | 67 | 0 | 11 | 58 | 25 | 83 | 71 | 43 | 53 | 56 | 60 |
| Fantilli | 33 | 67 | 83 | 57 | 67 | 100 | 60 | 67 | 55 | 44 | 71 | 100 | 62 | 60 | 63 | 78 | 33 | 50 |
| Pinelli | 25 | 67 | 56 | 75 | 54 | 29 | 75 | 67 | 20 | 20 | 59 | 33 | 75 | 80 | 35 | 41 | 59 | 63 |
| Gaunce | 20 | 33 | 100 | 33 | 83 | 50 | 33 | 40 | 33 | 25 | 75 | 50 | 40 | 33 | 50 | 67 | 44 | 44 |
| Johnson | 40 | 58 | 100 | 50 | 0 | 100 | 55 | 100 | 50 | 43 | 80 | 67 | 50 | 56 | 50 | 83 | 100 | 100 |
| Wood | 48 | 44 | 43 | 33 | 38 | 67 | 43 | 25 | 48 | 50 | 17 | 67 | 63 | 63 | 20 | 13 | 38 | 45 |
| Voronkov | 40 | 64 | 100 | 57 | 100 | 100 | 62 | 100 | 67 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 60 | 64 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 67 |
| Aston-Reese | 0 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 50 | 44 | 33 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 44 | 33 | 33 | 67 | 67 | 29 | 29 |
| Chinakhov | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 44 | 50 | 44 | 75 | 50 | 33 | 44 | 33 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 50 |
| Werenski | 41 | 85 | 67 | 82 | 63 | 75 | 75 | 40 | 45 | 43 | 60 | 67 | 70 | 72 | 36 | 46 | 50 | 60 |
| Provorov | 50 | 100 | 43 | 100 | 31 | 44 | 100 | 33 | 45 | 45 | 31 | 44 | 67 | 67 | 24 | 30 | 33 | 45 |
| Severson | 0 | 77 | 86 | 82 | 67 | 44 | 83 | 50 | 50 | 20 | 78 | 38 | 90 | 80 | 64 | 75 | 53 | 57 |
| Fabbro | 63 | 38 | 38 | 21 | 38 | 75 | 29 | 75 | 67 | 50 | 45 | 60 | 42 | 46 | 30 | 33 | 50 | 50 |
| Mateychuk | 40 | 63 | 67 | 67 | 31 | 33 | 75 | 43 | 40 | 14 | 47 | 27 | 83 | 70 | 39 | 56 | 25 | 29 |
| Smith | 25 | 38 | 44 | 25 | 56 | 67 | 27 | 60 | 50 | 20 | 44 | 60 | 20 | 27 | 17 | 17 | 62 | 62 |
